It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did no one read my post?
f Jesus really was the son of God (and for intellectual honesty here I will tell you my real belief which is that Jesus was just an ordinary person who was later transformed into a religion) he wouldn't need to use kaballah as he would be God and therefore omnipotent. Only mortals (and maybe angels and demons?) require kabbalah to perform miracles.
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Originally posted by idle_rocker
reply to post by rexpop
God is all-loving. Evil is necessary to reveal love and right-thinkingness.
Okay so what you're saying is... you wouldn't recognize someone being nice to you without people being jerks to you?...
or you wouldn't be able to see people doing good in the world without the people doing bad?........
These are dangerous belief systems which allow those bad people to exist in tolerance.
Originally posted by rexpop
Originally posted by idle_rockerThat still doesn't mean God isn't all-loving. He doesn't create the wars and other evils you mention. He does not love those.
Then, by your own admission, He's not all-loving: there exists something he does not love (namely sin). He might be very, very loving, but as long as there is something, even the tiniest thing, even the most hateful thing, that He does not love, he cannot, by definition, be all-loving. The important part here is the all bit.
God does not love sin. He did not create sin, Satan did.
I agree with that (apart from the Jesus part). I do want to stress that my own personal beliefs are very similar to yours, idle_rocker, I just want to make clear that theodicy is no simple matter. There is no answer to it that is going to satisfy everybody, or even answer the problem in its totality. The problem of evil is something we all have to struggle with if we believe in both an omnibenevolent and omnipotent God. I'm not trying to say you're wrong, I'm just trying to say that it's a profoundly difficult issue and that there are no easy answers. If there were, theodicy wouldn't have been the hot-topic for theologians from time immemorial to present day. No one has yet found a solution that answers the problem comprehensively. If they had, we wouldn't even be having this discussion. I just think it's really important for all believers of anything (and not just talking about religion here) not to get complacent in their assumptions and faith. Faith is meant to be a struggle, a constant dialectic with the Almighty - at least in my opinion, although I have no beef with you if you disagree completely.
I agree with you in this whole paragraph in that it's very difficult to understand AND that theolgians throughout the centuries have argued the same message. No one person can claim to have the answer...only God knows himself. However, what I can give you is my opinion and it is, of course, my opinion as is everything else I post on ATS.
Also, for those of us for whom Jesus does not figure in our faith, the problem of Evil is not answered by Jesus' crucifixion.
What the crucifixion did, and resurrection, was to cleanse us all who ask for forgiveness from our sins, that God dislikes. This does not however *un-make* him all-loving. It just makes him not like sin, which he did not create, so I think he has a right to dislike it, especially since it has all but destroyed mankind.
I used the cross to demonstrate that Jesus recognized that men do not recognize the evil that they do, even though they have been told time and time again. I guess you missed my point on that.
Look, I'm not here to argue with you. Or, to push my belief system on you. I actually loathe athiests who try to do the same thing to me, so no problem here. I am just explaining it how I understand it the best way I know how and make it in as simplistic terms as possible. I can go out and find a whole lot of theological teachings to back me up, but they would probably go over lots of folks' heads (not saying yours'). If you would like to discuss it in private, I am always glad to do so.
EDIT: for typos, the usual drill
[edit on 16/3/2008 by rexpop]
Ha Qabala
"One reason for this is that “Qabalistic masters maintain that it was not the serpent (Enki) [in the Garden of Eden] who was the deceiver as we are led to understand. The deceiver in this instance was Enki’s half-brother, Eloh-Jehovah (Enlil), "
Kabbalah is nothing but a level of conscious mind in among the collective mind consciousness and touching the universal consciousness.
You Idealisim of "bible truth" is actually relitivly new and well deluted from the original understandings.
Originally posted by RUFFREADY
Jesus..I don't care! I have to get props together for tomorrow! Jesus!! I don't care!! I have to take my kid to the dentist next thrusday!! Jesus!! I don't care!! I have to check my blood sugar!! I just don't care!! I have to pay bills to keep my house!! I don't have time!! Jesus...get it!!
Originally posted by Incarnated
reply to post by idle_rocker
Modern "Christianity" "biblical truths" are a product of Ameican Lit that reaches around 175 back. This is well documented regardless of what big dummie say. It's basic learning for any core american lit college class.
Originally posted by idle_rocker
Look, I'm not here to argue with you. Or, to push my belief system on you. I actually loathe athiests who try to do the same thing to me, so no problem here. I am just explaining it how I understand it the best way I know how and make it in as simplistic terms as possible. I can go out and find a whole lot of theological teachings to back me up, but they would probably go over lots of folks' heads (not saying yours'). If you would like to discuss it in private, I am always glad to do so.