Voter Fraud ???? , page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 53 times
Topic started on 9-1-2008 @ 07:34 AM by Nailer

Voter Fraud ????


www.youtube.com
Is this true ? I believe it is very true.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 08:17 AM by Purduegrad05
I just looked at this too....pasted the numbers in an Excel file and it seems to be true, that Ron Paul's votes were pushed to the left in the bottom row where the totals are. This was reported in the Boston Globe and Ron Paul's votes were given to McCain. Check it for yourself....also, the first six columns were counted the right way with the proper totals at the bottom of those columns. The false numbers start with McCain's column and continue to the right to the "Write-Ins" column.

ALSO....Look here everyone
www.cnn.com...

The numbers match to what the Boston Globe put on their website but they are obviously put next to the wrong person...
Results should be, based on Boston Globe numbers....
#1 Ron Paul 86802
#2 Tom Tancredo 73806
#3 Mick Huckabee 26035

If the "news" agencies report that McCain won while the numbers on the Globe website show Ron Paul won, then we have a major problem....not that I'm at all surprised!!


Purduegrad05


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 08:43 AM by Purduegrad05
www.youtube.com...

Just checked the Boston.com link on the youtube video again, had to actually register with this thing but I wanted to check it out so I did.....they changed the numbers at the bottom of the page of the spreadsheet on their website, adjusting the numbers to McCain's column....HOWEVER, they did not change the numbers up top where the color key is for each of the different precincts, keeping the old numbers when this page was updated the first time at 1:48am.

When I checked it again this morning it was updated at 9:20am with the changes I made above...something is not right here. Granted it could have been an honest mistake but then why would the first six columns be correct and all the rest not, just my observation. Looking forward to the feedback.


Purduegrad05


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 09:12 AM by Bhadhidar
reply to post by Purduegrad05




I strongly suggest that you confront the newspaper and demand an explanation; if possible, incorporate screen shots of what you oberved in your post to the paper.

Their response will be most interesting, I'll bet.


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 09:53 AM by Purduegrad05
reply to post by Bhadhidar



Unfortunately, I only have paper copies of when I first saw their numbers posted on Boston.com, just didn't think to make a screen shot of it, but a hard copy should work.

Honestly, I don't think it will do much to change things since they'll just shrug off the "mistake" as a typo, LOL, but how do you screw up the ENTIRE listing and then move the totals over. Even with the most basic excel skills it's tough to mess that up. Hopefully someone out there will contact the Boston Globe as well, we shall see.

Anyone for 100 more years in Iraq, I sure am!!


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 09:58 AM by SEEWHATUDO
This story is showing up everywhere except mainstream, of course.

here is another link
www.truthnews.us...

I guarantee if mainstream picks it up they will make Ron Paul and his supporters into comical material, the conspiracy nuts.


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 10:16 AM by Purduegrad05
reply to post by flice



Let's hope he and his campaign staff notice this and report it, possibly asking for a recount or show the voter fraud, whatever has to be done.
One thing that is puzzling....if the polls have said that 70%+ of the American people are OPPOSED to the war, how does a PRO-WAR candidate with LESS money, i.e. less real support from people, win the Republican primary in the most INDEPENDENT voting state in the country?? Just doesn't make sense.


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 11:07 AM by Icarus Rising
reply to post by Nailer



If you notice in the video, the names of the candidates go across the page in alphabetical order. So, I don't believe there is a mix-up in the order of names in the column headings. The only other possibility, if the page in the video wasn't manipulated and the numbers transposed on purpose as a hoax, is the votes were somehow entered in the wrong order for McCain and Paul in the precinct rows. Which makes no sense to me whatsoever.....

While on the subject of voter fraud, I was having a conversation with my brother just the other day about Hillary, and how the Clinton's have so much baggage that I can't see her winning the nomination unless she cheats somehow again, like it appears she did in circumventing campaign finance laws in her Senate run. Then, pow!, she defies the polls and wins New Hampshire, gets dubbed the comeback kid, and is right back at the top.

Yes, folks. I believe we are being manipulated on many levels and a monumental scale here.

[edit on 9-1-2008 by Icarus Rising]


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 11:22 AM by Purduegrad05
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
reply to
post by Nailer



If you notice in the video, the names of the candidates go across the page in alphabetical order. So, I don't believe there is a mix-up in the order of names in the column headings. The only other possibility, if the page in the video wasn't manipulated and the numbers transposed on purpose as a hoax, is the votes were somehow entered in the wrong order for McCain and Paul in the precinct rows. Which makes no sense to me whatsoever.....


Icarus,
I thought maybe the video was fake or the page numbers manipulated by the youtube user, but that is just not the case. The link to the polling by town numbers was posted on the youtube page and I checked it early this morning and printed off a copy for myself. Then, less than an hour later, I checked it again and the editor changed the numbers, moving the big numbers to McCain's column to add make it add up to the 80,000 plus votes that they said he received. Now, I would suspect that someone made an error when editing the numbers and putting them on the website, however, after reviewing the numbers this morning the first time, the first 6 columns were correctly lined up with their appropriate totals from "Pcts. Reporting" to "Hunter". The rest of the columns show the big numbers in Ron Paul's column, with his 86,802 votes in McCain's totals row. Seems to me that the editor put Paul's number total in McCain's total area on purpose, keeping the big number votes in Paul's column, since that number of total votes was reported on CNN and other various news sites. I'm going to try to scan the copies I have and get them on here soon, we'll see. I guess maybe we'll never know.


Purduegrad05


reply posted on 9-1-2008 @ 11:25 AM by vegno
reply to post by Nailer



WOW, just wow. I don't know what to say right now. This is so blatant it's beyond disgusting. I just cannot see how a broke, unpopular Mccain wins NH with such a big margin. What bs, damnit this ruined my day and I don't even live in the 'States.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 10 days ago with 59 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags
White House pressure on Gulf oil leak figures
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags