It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by octotom
This is all probably a typo. Ron Paul is a loser. He has no chance to win. Everyone knew before that McCain would win.
Ron Paul doesn't know his Constitution. I believe that Ron Paul is being used by someone to try and tear this country apart because he has a cult like following behind him. I think that if that many people voted for him as well that people are going to say, "Hey! Everyone in my town voted for him! Why didn't he win!!!"
Also, if it were rigged and Ron Paul actually got all those votes, the people who counted the votes probably voted for him too, and I doubt that they would report that their man didn't win.
In the end, I will rest assured that Ron Paul the un-constitutionalist won't be president. I saw him on Leno the other night and he tied every answer back to why we shouldn't be in Iraq. Loser.
Originally posted by dark_matter06
There are currently families of people in Sutton Co. N.H. that have voted for Ron Paul and yet he received no votes. This is real people. Do you think the "Live Free or Die" state is suddenly voting for not only the most war hungry Rep. but also the only Dem. that supports the war? Maybe, but those families in Sutton Co. didn't vote for them and now, thanks to a private corp. there votes will be lost forever. In case you where not informed, a "re-count" is really re-counted by the very same Diebold machines used in the original count. That's right, THE PAPER BALLOTS are counter by the same electronic Diebold machines proven capable of being rigged. New Hampshire votes where cast 80-82% on Diebolds.
Originally posted by Nailer
Voter Fraud ????
(visit the link for the full news article)
Is this true ? I believe it is very true.