No real energy solutions, ever., page 1

reply to post by jpm1602

---

Well that's part of the problem - that of free energy. Most people understand the economics behind not allowing free energy devices, simply because it takes away the control of making a profit of energy. For those who don't understand it probably own eighteen remote controls and don't feel bad about buying AA batteries all the time (that is another conspiracy though).

Since it would not be feasible for an energy company or consortium to allow free energy or even an energy source that undercuts whatever it is they are already doing, they will never allow a device that actually costs less to manufacture than it would put out in equal value in power. If it did, they would just be losing money directly or indirectly depending on their relationship to the manufacturer.

In other words, if it costs $100,000 to produce a wind turbine, you can be assured that it is designed to not produce $100,000 worth of electrical power - ever. If it actually made money out of thin air indefinitely, then it would be a free energy device and building enough of them could in theory put power companies out of business. Instead, the business model would follow that the service life of the turbine will be short enough that the cost to produce it will be more than what you would normally get out of it.

The Peak Oil Lie: Oil is NOT going to run out
  Posted 7 days ago with 9 member flags

Oil\'s tipping point has passed
  Posted 10 days ago with 3 member flags

Why The US Will Never Be \'Energy Independent\'
  Posted 16 days ago with 2 member flags

Worldometers: Oil officially ends November 9 2053 ( 9/11 )
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags

Strange sounds being heard in Canadian North caused by ground re-settling from oil field mining
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: