I'm fairly new here, and have been 'lurking' for a couple of weeks. I've read several threads, and have greatly enjoyed the conversations.
I haven't exactly found what I was looking for, so I thought starting this thread might help those like me, who are new to the site. ATS seems to
have the bulk of the internet's collective 'evidence' here within it's various threads.
I LOVE that each case is given it's own thread, and the merits of that case are debated within the thread, however, the great number of different
cases makes it difficult to examine the actual 'evidence' from a wider perspective.
While browsing the site, and learning the functions, I came across a thread that may help us, it's titled: Compilation: The Best UFO Cases...
I feel this thread was a stroke of pure genius, and is perhaps the beginning of the next evolution in examining bulk evidence in a user generated
environment like ATS.
I think we need more of this type of thread. Specifically, I'm proposing here a compilation dedicated to EBE Evidence. This evidence can come in
the form of a picture, video, audio, etc. There are only two criteria, 1) That 'Evidence' exists, some form of physical data that can be
scrutinized here. A pic, a clip, etc. 2) That this 'Evidence' pertains directly to an EBE (Extraterrestrial Biological Entity), ie a pic of an
alien, or video of one.
I would ask that submitters format their additions to this thread accordingly: Evidence Description: (Short description of data) Evidence Source: (Place you found the data) Evidence: (The picture or video itself) ATS Thread(s) Pertaining to Evidence: (Link(s) to ATS Thread(s) discussing this data)
Possible Idea for Moderators...
In addition to the criteria listed above, Moderators at ATS would be in a position (programming and site access-wise) to add another tag to each
image: Status of Evidence: (UNDER INVESTIGATION, UNKNOWN, EXPLAINED, or HOAX, and a link to the source you are using to label the status. This
means, if you read at site x that picture y is a HOAX, you would label the status as HOAX, and then post a link to site x.)
I really don't want this thread to turn into a running debate about which pics are 'real' and which are 'fakes', so ATS posters please just stick
to the first set of criteria.
Lets try to establish a database where we can all go to examine EBE evidence itself, without arguments supporting or attacking the evidence.
This will theoretically give us all a shared knowledge base as well, and allow us to debate specific evidences by referencing this page for the source
Thank you very much for your time. Like I said before, I'm new here, and am only trying to organize data. If EBE evidence has already been compiled
in a place I can't locate, please accept my apologies and someone U2U me with the link
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar Evidence Description: Real Alien Pictures (Also known as 'Aliens Night Out', depicting a 'backyard' encounter with several 'grays' Evidence Source:www.aliensthetruth.com... Evidence: ATS Thread(s) Pertaining to Evidence:www.abovetopsecret.com...
Those images I found very compelling because I think they could be real. I heard Jaime Maussan talk about these on a video I found on Google I found
it pretty compelling.
Okay, I'm back on this archival project, and I feel the need to report here before posting further. I've spent the past 3 and a half hours
approximately researching through the ATS threads for Evidence. Sadly, after my initial findings of (at least on the surface) several pieces of
credible evidence, today's searching has provided me with a lot of, how shall I say it... 'crap'?
I've been thinking on this, and I've decided to post the 'crap' here in this thread too. If we're going to have an archive of all of the
potential EBE evidence, who am I too screen out what evidence qualifies?
Using the format already established, (listing threads at ATS where each case is discussed) should lead the reader down the right path to establishing
for themselves the level of credibility of each piece of evidence.
So please let me apologize for posting things I'm pretty sure aren't real. I do not attempt to mislead anyone, I just want to get all of the
evidence assembled so that we can all have a look at it in it's bulk form. There needs to be a single page that we can all point to when discussing
the overall data for the existence of EBEs. This will be helpful for both 'believers' and 'skeptics' alike.
So I just wanted to be clear, I'm in no way endorsing any of this evidence, just assembling it.
Also, please consider this an open invitation to any moderators to Edit any of my posts in this thread, to include a clear HOAX label, if the ATS
threads pertaining to that evidence have concluded this.
Mods: Also feel free to edit my posts in this thread to add links to other threads here at ATS that also discuss that evidence. I'm doing my best,
but there are a TON of threads here, and I'm new. If you remember a thread that I've missed, please add it!
One final note, I'm also going to post a few pieces of evidence here that I haven't seen at ATS yet. I'll do this after I feel I've exhausted the
ATS archives, so that I can be fairly certain I haven't missed an existing thread.
And if anyone has any actual evidence, ie a pic or video of:
The Varginha affair (1996)
Please post it!
Evidence Description: Real Alien Pics... Compiliation at External Website... From the thread,
Super Moderator 'Byrd' says,
"Well, let's see... from the top we've got:
* Alien from the debunked "alien autopsy"
* "Real Baby" is actually S/FX from a horror movie and not Harlequin fetus" (I know I've seen the movie. Want to say "Rosemary's Baby II" but I
don't think that's right. One of the movie buffs here can tell us)
* Obvious Fake is a sculpt job from an S/FX studio (we discussed it here in '03 or so)
* Carcass is another from the debunked "alien autopsy"
* Skull is classic Peruvian (I believe) head binding.
* "alien" is another sculpt S/FX job.
* Yet Another Skull is classic head binding. No aliens involved. "
Evidence Description: Yet Another Mexican Alien Video...
This is the one where a 'robot' is claimed to be filmed... Evidence Source:www.youtube.com... Evidence: ATS Thread(s) Pertaining to Evidence:www.abovetopsecret.com...
b]Evidence Description: Dead Alien Found In Dumpster...
From the Thread, Free-Spirit was quoted,
"The alleged little dead alien is just a plastic alien toy used as a keyholder or souvenir and sold in most ufo related stores. The video was
presented by a person from Los Angeles sometime ago telling a tale that this was an actual little alien that he found somewhere ... End of story."
Evidence Description: Leaked footage from real alien incident in 1984. Lake County Incident, or McPherson Tape...
From the thread, IsaacKoi says,
"While this is not a link to the film of an alleged abduction that appears regularly on ATS and certain other forums (i.e. the movie entitled
“Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County”, commonly referred to as "The McPherson tape”) you may be interested to know that "The McPherson
Tape" was a remake.
The version of "The McPherson Tape" broadcast in 1998 on UPN was in fact a remake (NOT a re-enactment), with a MUCH bigger budget, of an earlier
version of the same movie. The first version was filmed in one night, with a budget of about $6,500.
Both versions of the movie were directed by Dean Alioto.
I've previously provided relevant links and references on ATS and elsewhere. Unless you want more, the link below probably contains sufficient
Evidence Source: Youtube video, now removed...
ATS Thread(s) Pertaining to Evidence: None that I know of so far, please start one if you wish
Well, after an entire day of researching evidence that does not inspire my own personal truth meter, I decided to post this short clip I found on
YouTube recently. While there are many questions about this clip (like why was the guy filming in the first place...) My initial impulse upon
viewing this scene was one of real fear. It might be faked, but wow did it scare the crap out of me. My girlfriend won't watch this one, which is
another sign (in my mind) that there might be something too it LOL.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.