posted on Dec, 8 2007 @ 11:01 AM
Originally posted by citizen truth
reply to post by jthomas
The evidence(not proof) is heresay,that being AA77 hitting the Pentagon.
So far I've seen pictures of some shiny metal scraps,ONE wheel,ONE questionable engine part,ONE questionable landing gear piece, and ONE picture with
a charred body in a seat.
Here is what you need to think about:
1) We have only a couple of dozen eyewitness reports available to us and the majority are consistent with AA77 hitting the Pentagon and
the other evidence. Importantly, however, is that we have hundreds
of other witnesses that were involved with the firefighting, rescue, and
recovery efforts that we haven't
heard from. The fact that they exist is relevant. The fact that we have not
heard from them implies
nothing but suggests the implausibility of every one of them being quiet if AA77 did not hit the Pentagon.
2) The same goes for existing photos you've seen. You cannot assume that something does not exist because you haven't seen a photo of it or one
isn't published on the internet, so drawing a conclusion from that fact is fallacious.
3) If you doubt that AA77 it the Pentagon, you must provide a plausible explanation for what happened to it and what hit the Pentagon consistent with
all of the other evidence. I note that from the very beginning of 9/11 conspiracy theories, 9/11 "researchers" have avoided all responsibility for
So you would have a hard time claiming the evidence is hearsay without doing all the research and getting all the information. To date, I have seen no
one bother to interview the hundreds of people who saw the wreckage in the Pentagon. Even Craig Ranke avoided doing that.