Please stop with the crazy claims!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 10-11-2007 @ 11:50 PM by citizen truth
reply to post by KaiBosh





at this point we will never know what really happened that day so it is all a moot point regardless.


So I guess we can all curl up on the porch and lay by our dish now.Many people died that day as everyone is aware of so I do NOT consider this point moot in any sense of the meaning.Have we become cattle?

Effective military?Which military was that?I get what you're saying,just had to chime in on that gem.


[edit on 10-11-2007 by citizen truth]


reply posted on 10-11-2007 @ 11:51 PM by antsi
reply to post by ULTIMA1


You think four Arabs who have never flown 7X7's before flew them so accurately into the towers and the Pentagon without any "electronic assistance" by the military?


reply posted on 10-11-2007 @ 11:53 PM by mentalempire
reply to post by ULTIMA1



But the government made little effort to cover up the warnings, a totally different situation than many of the other pieces of the 9/11 puzzle. Therefore, they probably made these bogus reports to be discovered later to support the "UBL did it" official story.


reply posted on 10-11-2007 @ 11:57 PM by mentalempire
reply to post by ULTIMA1



And, furthermore, NO ONE TOOK RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ATTACKS! (except for allegedly bin Laden in a highly spurious tape). You mean to tell me that a terrorist organization pulls off the deadliest terror attack in history and no one's bragging about it? Doesn't make sense unless you subscribe to either the false flag or the Abu Nidal-for-hire theory.


reply posted on 10-11-2007 @ 11:59 PM by mentalempire
reply to post by antsi



Could've been elites from the Abu Nidal Organization, see my post above.


reply posted on 11-11-2007 @ 12:02 AM by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by mentalempire
But the government made little effort to cover up the warnings, a totally different situation than many of the other pieces of the 9/11 puzzle. .


Not really true. Some warnings were not released, and you have some warnings that were classified.

www.ctstudies.com...
Early '01 Memo Warned of Al Qaeda Threat
….The memo, from former counterterrorism chief Richard A. Clarke to then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, had been described during the hearings, but its full contents had not been disclosed…..(Reuters, 12 Feb 05)

Bush team tried to suppress pre-9/11 report into al-Qa'ida
Federal officials were repeatedly warned in the months before the 11 September 2001 terror attacks that Osama bin Laden and al-Qa'ida were planning aircraft hijackings and suicide attacks, according to a new report that the Bush administration has been suppressing….(Belfast Telegraph, 11 Feb 05)

Memo warned Bush of al Qaeda threat
A newly released memo warned the White House at the start of the Bush
administration that al Qaeda represented a threat throughout the Islamic world, a warning that critics said went unheeded by President George W. Bush until the September 11, 2001, attacks….(Reuters, 11 Feb 05)

Sept 11 warnings ignored: report
United States aviation officials failed to respond to dozens of warnings of a possible terrorist threat months before September 11, 2001, according to a previously undisclosed report by the panel that probed the attacks….(Reuters, 11 Feb 05)

FAA ignored pre-9/11 terror alerts
In the months before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, federal aviation officials reviewed dozens of intelligence reports that warned about Osama bin Laden and al- Qaeda, some of which specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations, according to a previously undisclosed report from the 9/11 commission…..(New York Times, 10 Feb 05)

9/11 Commission: FAA Was Alerted to Potential Attacks
Federal Aviation Administration officials received 52 warnings ….(AP, 10 Feb 05)



reply posted on 11-11-2007 @ 12:08 AM by mentalempire
reply to post by themaster1



You shouldn't be shocked. John Lear, by his own admission, has a long history of doing covert ops for the government. John Lear's unswerving adherence to the least credible of theories 100% of the time supports a theory that he is just being paid by the gov't to make us all look bad.


reply posted on 11-11-2007 @ 12:10 AM by mentalempire
reply to post by ULTIMA1



DUDE, this was stuff the 9/11 whitewash commission uncovered. They ignored CD data. They poo-pooed the insider trading. But they "found" this. Why?


reply posted on 11-11-2007 @ 12:12 AM by semperfortis
Why are you ignoring the video of the planes hitting the towers?


Also let us not forget the Millions that watched it live that fateful day...

My many brother and sister officers that were there, in person...

If we are going to start saying that all of them are lying, then we might as well accept that Elvis is in Panama having tea with Princess Diana and John Kennedy while watching Jim Morrison play guitar...

The way that I see it is if we begin to simply discount "eyewitness" account, than most of history can be discounted.

There is no real proof that it is ME here typing this post to ATS, except my wife sitting next to me. If the eyewitness's are lying about 9/11, maybe my wife is lying too and I am not really here...

As silly as that sounds, it is as applicable as believing no planes hit the towers.

How is it scientific in any way to pick and choose what eye witness accounts you are going to believe and which you are not? Is it scientific to believe only the ones that fit what ever conspiracy theory we make up in our minds and disbelieve all others?

The actually hilarious thing is when the "discounters" demand factual evidence... When did it become necessary for someone supporting the factual side of a debate to provide proof to someone supporting an alternate theory?
Would it not be more appropriate for the "non believers" to provide said proof?
The supporters of the facts have numerous film accounts, plane parts and destroyed buildings as well as hundreds of eyewitness accounts, yet the "nonbelievers" still "demand" proof.. That is rich...

Maybe JFK was not shot...
Maybe Pearl Harbor was never attacked...
Maybe the Oklahoma bombing never took place...
I've watched the Shuttle go up, but maybe it only goes behind a cloud and comes back down...
And just because I say I have watched it, maybe I have not....

If one is going to think it is scientific to disbelieve eye witness testimony, then where do you draw the line on believable? Pearl Harbor? JFK? Elvis?

Semper


reply posted on 11-11-2007 @ 12:19 AM by citizen truth
reply to post by 4thDoctorWhoFan





Umm....I am not claiming a hoax.The 'no plane' or 'hologram' theories is the hoax.


Can you for one minute read what you write and lay off the emoties.You quote me and say you are NOT claiming a hoax and in the next breath claim that the no plane theory is a hoax.

I don't recall ever saying that planes did not fly into the WTC.If I did please find the quote.


If you are a proponent of the official story then prove it's correct.I already did.
Didn't you see the video of the planes flying into the towers?
I'm sure who have heard the reports of the people inside and outside of the building who saw the planes hit the towers with their own eyes. Again, how much more proof do you need?

You're cracking me up.Just because planes hit the towers PROVES the Official story is true???That's a very shallow argument.



BTW, I'm sure you have seen the video from the parking lot or something like that which showed a plane flying into the pentagon.


You saw a plane?Can you screen grab that for me and show the Boeing please.I've done so and mine doesn't show a Boeing.It shows an alleged aircraft but it looks more like a Global Hawk or an F-16.



So you are saying because their is no video of the plane hitting the pentagon that the entire 9/11 event was fraud. Is this what you are saying? I hope not. You do realize that there is not always a camera around right?


Do you have any idea how many cameras were on and around the Pentagon?One of the most protected sites on American soil and some schlep forgot to turn on the cameras?I can't buy that.

I'd suggest you do some more research.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags