Originally posted by dk3000
reply to post by jfj123
The wizard is right on the money as is Lear with the exception of a few key points which are not enough to debunk their theories.
The problem is they have no evidence that their ideas are correct. Neither have supplied any credible evidence of the existence of the sophisticated holograms.
The people have been deceived on a scale so massive that it defies comprehension- which is exactly what it was designed to do. It is not a failed red-flag op. Quite the contrary- it worked like a charm.
This is an interesting opinion.
The government does not give a hoot about conspiracy theorists and never has- in fact most conspiracy theorists are unwittingly propagating disinformation causing even more confusion and distrust with facts- clearly affirming incompetence- which only serves to support the government not being able to pull off such a massive ruse.
ie john lear and wizard in the woods
David Copperfield made a jet disappear on the tarmac- the Statue of Liberty disappeared and many more events. The powers that be are even better magicians- thus anything is possible.
Well not anything is possible. Nobody has the ability to defy physics. This is why there were no hologram planes.
And while we argue fact and fiction- our freedoms are being systematically destroyed and many times with our go ahead for the safety of the nation.
This is a very valid and real point that should be understood by everyone.
Everyday this becomes more evident- the debunker's are relentless, repetitive and they will never stop- EVER.
Well I think many people misunderstand the difference between a skeptic/truth seeker and a debunker. For example, John Lear keeps posting his fanciful ideas as fact. Many people ask him to prove it yet he won't do so in any way. So does demanding a person back up what they say mean we are debunkers or simply truth seekers?
