NASA Scientist Fired - Promises Disclosure, page 31

Parsing the Language of the DARK MOON Website
Part 1
SITE

I gotta say, the language of their page leaves a lot to be desired. Somehow I doubt this is Hoaglands writing. At least I hope it isn't.

Maybe the NSA has been microwaving his writing lobe into something mushy and Ramen noodle-like, rather than the really imaginative, and persuasive guy I've always thought him to be.

Language is very important. It's really all we have.
Especially if one wishes to persuade another to a point of view, or sell them an idea.

This author could stand a class or two in writing copy, or perhaps a good editor or proofreader at the very least. I'm not talking of "grammar police" type stuff, we all make mistakes, I'm talking about statements that have a clarity to them and transmit real information that the reader can easily follow. Especially if you are setting out to inform the public at large of something so incredible, so astonishing, they may have a hard time believing it. Or spending a few bucks on. Ask any salesman.

Imagine if the inventor of the microscope, Anton van Leeuwenhoek had been born in darkest rural Alabama, and after examining the tiny critters he found in a nearby pond, he announced to the world, "hey y'all, theys li'l bugs in the water!" ...he'd likely be ignored by the scientific community for at least a while. One should devote a bit of effort to truly communicate, especially when trying to get across ideas about sciency kinds of stuff the average person may have a little difficulty with.

So what is it these folks are trying to sell us...er, tell us with this page?
What can we truly glean from the quality of this information?

"Lunar ruins? Intelligent artifacts? Deep mysteries? Impenetrable secrets?"

Lunar Ruins!
Excellent start, two simple words joined together, set my imagination ablaze with possibilities....

"Intelligent Artifacts"
What exactly is an Intelligent artifact? I have to assume he means "artifact made by non-human intelligence" in this context, but "intelligent artifact" doesn't mean anything. Might make a cool band name though.

"Deep Mysteries"
Oh, yeah...
(And better than where all those missing socks escape to I'll bet.)

Impenetrable Secrets?
YES, YES,YES!

"Are there really? large, nearly-invisible glass objects hiding in the background of some classic NASA shots from the Apollo missions?"

Really? I mean Really?
Is "nearly-invisible glass" like the kind so many of us walk right into in those sliding patio doors?
Looked completely invisible to me the last time I did that.

"Soon afterwards, our book on the subject, Dark Mission, soared to number 21 on the New York Times Bestseller List for Paperback Nonfiction."

I suppose that is worth bragging about, but then I think Stephen Colbert, Rush Limbaugh and that guy who pissed off Oprah managed to accomplish that too. You'd think the label "non-fiction" would really mean No Fiction. Reminds me of the old joke about McDonalds signage, "Billions Served" but they don't really tell you how many products were actually eaten.