A New Light In Our Sky?, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 64 times


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 09:28 AM by Wired
reply to post by Copernicus



It was also noted in 1662, 1777, 1892 and now in 2007...every 115 years. Why this occurs is still a mystery.



reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 09:38 AM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by Wired



Wired --

What's your source on this? As far as I know, it wasn't discovered until 1892 -- and back then it underwent 2 eruptions in 10 weeks time -- so the every 115 years doesn't really work.

EDIT:
Sorry bigprobe...I must have been typing my post while you were posting yours.

[edit on 10/30/2007 by Soylent Green Is People]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 09:41 AM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by Wired



Is there any proof that this is the same comet as the 1662 and 1777 comet? I can't tell by these written accounts of a comet that this is necessarily the same one. There are a lot of comets out there.

[edit on 10/30/2007 by Soylent Green Is People]

[edit on 10/30/2007 by Soylent Green Is People]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 09:48 AM by Wired
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



Apparently the timing is everything...the 115 year timeline falls in place with this Comet and for those writing about this in 1662,1777 thought that is was remarkable enough to give it mention over the other so-called comets of that period...just a guess!



reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 09:56 AM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by Wired



It is true that this is a strange coincidence that should be studied. Maybe someone could track down the excact dates and locations of the comet in those historical texts (if the dates and location are even known!) and compare those sightings to the path of this comet.

I suppose it is possible that they are the same, but without proof we can't say. Good POTENTIAL find.


[edit on 10/30/2007 by Soylent Green Is People]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 09:59 AM by Copernicus
reply to post by Wired



Yes, its possible its the same comet, but you sound quite arrogant and seems to "know" it it...

It may be. But just look at how many comets we are tracking this year alone...



[edit on 30-10-2007 by Copernicus]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 10:00 AM by Wired
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



Yes, its just like everything today...Proof is Required but here is a little fact that is here and NOW! Oct 28 Vs. Oct. 30 size comparison...again Wow!

patrick.bornet1.free.fr...


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 10:23 AM by Wired
reply to post by Wired



I'm sorry if I "sound" arrogant as if I know...I don't! I'm just passing on research that I have compiled in the last couple of days...and you? What does arrogance sound like anyway?
Something I learned from an old Sage..."Say it as if its the TRUTH and the words will stir the ears with wonder"

tbn0.google.com...:4g3J4-7nmGRebM:www.morseburggalleries.com...


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 10:26 AM by Copernicus
reply to post by Wired



I think its mostly the term "Wow" that makes you sound arrogant. Of course I could be misinterpreting it...

But good info, thanks for the links.


[edit on 30-10-2007 by Copernicus]


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 01:46 PM by Wired
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe



I haven't been able to locate anything further back. 1547 would be the next date. This site talks about stars being viewable at noonin 1547. If this thing gets that bright it will be a sight o see....and for a little conspiracy woo woo...1547 is the last 4 numbers in NASA's Comet Study phone number 202/358-1547

books.google.com... jPLGKOQ


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 01:52 PM by Donoso
reply to post by BONGMANWEED



It's not coming towards Earth. In fact, if you'd read the previous posts then you'd realize it's heading in the other direction - away from Earth & towards Jupiter's orbital.

Here's a funny quote from Nasa's picture of the day gallery:


Although Comet Holmes' orbit will place it in northern hemisphere skies for the next two years, whether it will best be viewed through a telescope or sunglasses remains unknown.


There's really no telling at this point how bright it'll get. If it's an outgassing event it should diffuse for some time. The brightness after a certain point will start to decrease until it's back to its original magnitude of 17, not, 3.


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 02:28 PM by yahn goodey
reply to post by Vikturtle



it must be nice to get see all these wonderfull sights in the heavens----where i live its like everytime something fantastic up there is about to happen we end up getting cloud cover for a week------story of my life so far.i bet(if i was allowed to bet)if i moved the clouds would follow me.


reply posted on 30-10-2007 @ 02:44 PM by yahn goodey
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe



my wife agrees with you 1892 that is what she says she just saw on the computer but doesnt remember where.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 14 hours ago, 106 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 68 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 replies