|
reply posted on 12-11-2007 @ 03:45 PM by ARNOMANNN
|
Is it Possible any of these developements with this comet have anything to do with planet X??? Or could this comet be Planet X?????
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2007 @ 03:53 PM by wierdalienshiznit
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2007 @ 04:05 PM by XFoxMulderX
|
All this talk of a "Red and Blue" light in the sky makes me want to go out and look for it, but it's a complete overcast where I live, so I'll
have to wait until tommorw night
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 12-11-2007 @ 05:08 PM by mythatsabigprobe
|
Originally posted by ARNOMANNN
Is it Possible any of these developements with this comet have anything to do with planet X??? Or could this comet be Planet X?????
Well, let's look at the similarities.
Comet Holmes: Small Comet 2.5 miles diameter.
Planet X: Large Planet 20 - 30,000 miles diameter.
Comet Holmes: Orbits the sun every 7 years, never gets closer than a quarter billion miles from Earth.
Planet X: Orbits the sun every 3600 years, occasionally crashing into Earth and destroying all life.
Comet Holmes: A lump of ice crystals and dust.
Planet X: Inhabited by 7 foot tall Annunaki that created mankind as a race of slaves.
Comet Holmes: A real comet, recorded by real scientists, with it's orbit verified since 1892.
[color=Yellow]Planet X: A theory created by a man who's only evidence is a blob on an old clay pot. [/color]
Comet Holmes: Will return in 2014 but will only be noticed by a small group of men with calculators on their watches.
Planet X: Due to return in 2012 and destroy all life on Earth ...again.
Everyone will believe what they want, but I'm pretty sure it's just a comet.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 15-11-2007 @ 10:59 PM by Brock Gel
|
This has been a fun ride and a fun mystery and now it's turning out to be a great finale! Comet 17P Holmes has been so much fun to watch. It's
getting dimmer but with binoculars you really can see how big it's getting. Ten times as much fun as Halley's return and the show keeps getting
better and better and now this! Bravo!
This is all from today's (nov 15th) spaceweather.com. Enjoy.
www.spaceweather.com...
GIANT COMET: "Formerly, the sun was the largest object in the Solar System," says University of Hawaii astronomer David Jewett. "Now, Comet
17P/Holmes holds that distinction." On Nov. 9th, a team of Hawaii astronomers led by Rachel Stevenson measured the diameter of the comet's expanding
debris cloud: 1.4 million kilometers, slightly larger than the sun itself.[/size]
[edit on 15-11-2007 by Brock Gel]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-12-2007 @ 06:43 PM by euclid
|
Originally posted by neformore
Firstly, its not possible to "ignite" Saturn with a space probe, or a nuke, or several hundred nukes - of any kind. I refer the honourable readers
to comet Shomaker-Levy 9, and the overall effect and force of explosions that occurred when it hit Jupiter.
Not entirely true. The Shoemaker comet caused a huge explosion. But remember that it also had no fissionable material.
The Lucifer Project, as described on several sites, if correct and if my own personal understanding of nuclear physics is correct; contends that if a
sufficient amount of fissionable material is inserted deep enough into the atmosphere of a gas giant that is largely comprised of hydrogen and helium
it would be possible to create a chain-reaction. All that would be necessary is to assure that the material would be able to reach a sufficient depth
in the atmosphere so that pressure surrounding the fissionable material was sufficient to compress it during its ignition phase. Upon ignition of the
material the atmosphere being of an equal pressure would ignite as well.
It would be similar to the way a nuclear bomb works.... it is the pressure placed upon the material by the primary explosion that causes it to reach
critical mass where ignition of the fissionable material (the secondary explosion) takes place. The key to creating the star is to make sure the
fissionable material gets to the proper depth to assure sufficient pressure during ignition so that a nuclear chain-reaction can begin at that depth
and propagate throughout the atmosphere. Whether it would be sustainable or not is also a critical question. Due to the fact that if the
chain-reaction were to consume all available material in the gas giants mass to quickly it could cause one big nuclear explosion..... I don't think
it would be a good thing if that happened.
But it would definately look cool for a little while.... until chunks of moon and the shock wave hit the Earth.
-Euclid
[edit on 4-12-2007 by euclid]
[edit on 4-12-2007 by euclid]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 10:26 AM by Copernicus
|
 
Remember this old thread? I took part in it 2 years ago as can be seen.
Now there is a video (check 3:30) on youtube saying that the hopi blue star
prophecy got fulfilled when Holmes entered our solar system and at one point was larger than the sun itself.
Whats the significance of this? Well, according to the video, there is a 7 year time window called "The End of Time" by the Maya and the time window
starts by this blue star being seen.
So that means October 24, 2007 is the start of this time window and we are living in it at the moment. In this period, it is said that our
consciousness will grow very rapidly and so on.
So thats kind of interesting in my opinion. Perhaps this was the blue star prophecy fulfilling and the beginning of "The End of Time" has started.
Its possible. There is no denying that Holmes was quite unique and certainly qualifies as a special sign in our skies.
Part 7 of 14 in this series is also interesting. Its about the pole shift, the 30 hours of darkness and so on.
[edit on 4-10-2009 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 12:41 PM by Dnevnoi
|
I think a comet's impact would be messier than nuclear weapons...
Just a thought.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-10-2009 @ 02:23 PM by yellowcard
|
The NWO claim is horsecrap science, you can't control a comet well enough to make it impact a portion of earth that you want. The same people who
make this claim are probably the same that say we can't land on the moon...which make logical sense. *sarcasm*Obviously if you can't land on the
moon then you can definitely control a comet.*/sarcasm*
[edit on 4-10-2009 by yellowcard]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 05:21 PM by BaronVonGodzilla
|
Originally posted by yellowcard
The NWO claim is horsecrap science, you can't control a comet well enough to make it impact a portion of earth that you want. The same people who
make this claim are probably the same that say we can't land on the moon...which make logical sense. *sarcasm*Obviously if you can't land on the
moon then you can definitely control a comet.*/sarcasm*
[edit on 4-10-2009 by yellowcard]
You set that straw man up and beat it back down again quite expertly sir.
But in the end, you only succeed in defeating yourself.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|