|
|
Topic started on 29-10-2007 @ 03:57 PM by Vikturtle
|
A New Light In Our Sky?
www.americanchronicle.com
 Some have suggested that the reason for Comet Holmes sudden brightening means it was impacted by an asteroid or that NASA shot an explosive
device into it as they did with the Tempel Comet in 2005. Many are questioning the coincidence of the Space Shuttle launch ocurring within hours of
the sudden change in appearance of the comet. And others have implied that sending a comet into the earth, and guiding it as was practiced with Comet
Tempel, would achieve the New World Order agenda of depopulation without the messiness of a nuclear bomb.
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 03:57 PM by Vikturtle
|
Lot of theories on this sudden brightening of Comet Holmes, pretty fascinating.
www.americanchronicle.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Vikturtle]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:02 PM by Copernicus
|
Anything is possible, but them turning Saturn into a second sun is the most frightening thing Ive ever read, and its becoming reality in July 2008.
Google the Lucifer project.
It turns out that this prophecy is actually in the book "And still they fly" written in 2001. It talks about megalomaniac scientists turning either
Jupiter or Saturn into a second sun, and it will burn for 7 days.
Anyway, not to hijack the thread, but NASA is frigging evil...
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:06 PM by Vikturtle
|
reply to post by Copernicus
Interesting and scary, I will check that out. Like we need a second sun... but there I go, thinking again.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:16 PM by Copernicus
|
reply to post by Vikturtle
Yeah, never question what the leaders tell us! They are the Speakers of Truth and Justice and you are to follow blindly or you shall be called a
"conspiracy theorist". 
Anyway, is it possible that this "comet" is actually a small planet, like in the Planet X theory? The article says it doesnt have a tail and it says
that "most" dont believe it will hit earth... ehm, most?
Interesting article.
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:19 PM by Vikturtle
|
reply to post by Copernicus
Seems folks are running wild with ideas. The scientists don't seem to understand the odd behavior of this comet and MSM don't appear to be covering
it, leaving everyone else to try to figure out what it means. Have you seen it? It's pretty impressive.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:21 PM by Essan
|
Comet Holmes was first discovered when it suddenly brightened in exactly the same way (although not quite so bright) in 1892 - don't think we had a
space station then .....
www.skyandtelescope.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:25 PM by dznetworks
|
Ok, if it is not cloudy tonight I am DEFINANTELY going to have to see this.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:29 PM by Vikturtle
|
Originally posted by dznetworks
Ok, if it is not cloudy tonight I am DEFINANTELY going to have to see this.
It's pretty cold here suddenly, in NC of all places, but I will bundle up and go out tonight to check upon it. It appeared bigger last night than
the night before, some say it will grow to be as big as the moon, hard to imagine, but I'd love to see it.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:30 PM by Copernicus
|
reply to post by Vikturtle
No, havent seen it myself. I noticed people said you can see it with your naked eye now on some google pages... how can I know im looking at the right
object and not just a star?
Im going to go outside and have a look... its 10.30 pm here and very dark. 
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:37 PM by Vikturtle
|
Originally posted by Copernicus
reply to post by Vikturtle
No, havent seen it myself. I noticed people said you can see it with your naked eye now on some google pages... how can I know im looking at the right
object and not just a star?
Im going to go outside and have a look... its 10.30 pm here and very dark.
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
Binoculars help, then you can see the sharp point of stars and planets and notice the difference of Comet Holmes, which is kind of fuzzy. Last night
the moon didn't come up until later and the comet was pretty bright. It looks like another star with the naked eye, but with binoculars it really
becomes clear. Good luck. Where are you located?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:42 PM by Copernicus
|
reply to post by Vikturtle
Sweden. I dont have binoculars though, I think im going to buy it tomorrow just so I can spot this thing... if this thing grows to be as big as the
moon, I imagine even the msm will have to cover it...
Hmm, look at this site. The guy even says "its a comet but looks like a planet".
Interesting.
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:47 PM by Vikturtle
|
reply to post by Copernicus
Yeah, that's my thought as well, but I wonder how they will cover it. Will it be more fear? Be afraid, be very afraid? I don't know how they can
avoid covering it, though, if it keeps growing. I'm loving it, I have to say.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 04:55 PM by justanothergangster
|
blog.wired.com... astronomers say this picture shows it has a tail but i dont see it however they also
say the tail doesnt point away from the sun.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 05:02 PM by Copernicus
|
reply to post by justanothergangster
I have to agree with the comment made on that site... it hardly looks like a tail. This may be a case of "a comet must have a tail so lets say this
one has a tail so it fits the comet theory".
Found a page with different pictures of the "comet" here: Link
Have a look at this picture where the observer says that the second
nucleus is actually a star.
Also look at this picture where the observer says the "comet" grew
that much in diameter in just 2 days...
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 05:49 PM by Vikturtle
|
Some are saying that the base has split into two or three parts, don't know if that is truth, just repeating what I have heard, but if that is the
case, what does that mean?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 05:54 PM by Copernicus
|
reply to post by Vikturtle
I would like to know too. They say this thing is larger than Jupiter now...
Some believe it to be the Hopi indian legend Blue Kachina star. But it doesnt seem blue.. 
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 05:58 PM by XFoxMulderX
|
Flagged. Very interesting stuff.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 06:15 PM by Telos
|
Flagged too.
Very interesting but scary at the same time. Is it a coincidence that the Space Shuttle launch ocured within hours from the explosion?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 29-10-2007 @ 06:18 PM by Copernicus
|
reply to post by Telos
I dont know, but since this happened in November 1892 as well (although not this bright), I dont think NASA did anything to cause it... but I could be
wrong. And I dont think it brightened a million times over night in 1892 like it did now... that has never happened before.
The comet was also in a major eruption 115 years ago, in November 1892, when English amateur Edwin Holmes was the first to spot it. It reached 4th
or 5th magnitude, faded in the following weeks, and then underwent a second eruption 2½ months after the first.
Source: WkyAndTelescope.com
[edit on 29-10-2007 by Copernicus]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
