posted on Oct, 29 2007 @ 12:27 AM
reply to post by IgnoreTheFacts
It's not
my thread.
No "hijacking" intended.
And yet, the title of that
other thread wasn't misleading, nor did it ask someone else to provide the grist for their mill.
My point?
It's disingenuous to title a thread as though it contains something of value, simply to lure others into providing the actual content.
It's even more galling to discover the mislabeled thread is simply a rant about someone's unfulfilled needs.
Yeah, we all want ironclad, indisputable proof, but whining about it won't make it so.
And expecting someone else to provide it so one doesn't have to risk having their own labors discredited, is recreant behavior, IMO.
In faith, I posted a link to a concurrent and brand new thread, not my own, that showed something strange in flight, apparently it's only valid if;
1) It's a video and 2) It's posted on
this thread to debunk, my bad.
There's been some interesting videos posted in
your thread, certainly well worthy of
their own threads, IMHO.
Maybe the providers of those links will consider doing so in the future.
As for this thread, I'm done.