The Shocking Video Hillary does NOT want you to See!!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 31 times


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 11:19 AM by sp00n1
Originally posted by dougfromupland

This would all be exposed if Woodward and Bernstein were still alive. Yes, I know. That's just a slap at them.


LOL!


The 14-min trailer has been No. 1 on google videos for several days. By the time of the screening at Harvard next Friday evening, it will have had over a million views.

video.google.com...


I'm surprised google didn't censor it... They don't like controversial videos making it into the popular lists.


We show the 1-hr documentary at Harvard on Oct 26, Dartmouth and UNH Durham on Oct 27, Saint Anselm on Oct 28, and in New York on Oct 30 at the Metropolitan Republican Club. If you have a group who wants to sponsor a screening, I'll take it anywhere in the country.


If i may recommend, you should also post the whole documentary on google. Now, i understand that you have worked hard on this and you deserve to recoup your production costs, but people really need to see this.

One example of effective google video marketing is Aaron Russo's America: Freedom To Fascism which exposes the fundamentally unsound principals behind the Federal Reserve System, and the unjust taxation system that is required to pay the interest payments on our own money.

He posts it free, then asks people to visit his site and buy the DVD. It appeared to work very well and reach lots of people that wouldn't see it otherwise.

Google, of course, deleted it a few times.


Google Video Link



[edit on 10/21/2007 by sp00n1]



reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 02:07 PM by drumist69
reply to post by dougfromupland



All I was meaning to say, in my post, was that to me it seems more important to look at the voting record of the candidates. Our system has devolved into one where a candidate's position on real issues of national and global importance are hardly even discussed, in favor of discussion of scandals. I guess its more sensationalistic. I've looked at Clinton's record, heard her talk about various policies in her platform, and have decided not to vote for her. Therefore, any improprieties don't concern me. Now, if she were to win the nomination, the have at it! Andy


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 03:40 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by groingrinder



You've got it all wrong. Our founding fathers were professional politicians, after all. What do you want to do, get average joes or jills into the White House? That's a grand idea-they'll be just as easily corrupted or misled as a poor person who has won the lottery.


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 03:46 PM by groingrinder
reply to post by uberarcanist



I totally disagree. They will not be professional politicians who make their livelihood from lying to the people. They will be motivated by public service. Unlike the criminals we have now who are motivated by greed and power from years in office sucking the life's blood of the American taxpayer. The founding fathers were mostly farmers and tradesmen, not professional politicians.



[edit on 10-21-2007 by groingrinder]



reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 03:50 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by groingrinder



Was Jefferson an average Joe? What about Washington? How many people actually do things out of ulterior motives? No, I would rather have someone with experience. There are plenty of professional politicians who are not corrupt, Hillary just isn't one of them.


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 06:10 PM by goose
reply to post by observe50



Good observation, I think Bill and the daddy Bush might have been friends a lot longer than anyone realizes. Here is a link that you might find interesting, there is a book and movie out about this incident.

www.idfiles.com...


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 06:16 PM by Redge777
reply to post by uberarcanist



I think what a person is experienced at makes a difference to, if a person is experienced at turning control over to corporations, and deceiving the American people, that is not the expert I want running things.

On a side note, saying the president runs things is a bit naive, I just watched an interview with a Watergate player, he said when it was all going down, Nixon called a Rockefeller and was heard saying on the phone, that he did not think a president should be put in jail. Who is really pulling the stings.


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 09:33 PM by sp00n1
reply to post by Realtruth



Every revolution is based on this basic premise. Those seeking power speak out about any number of the injustices we see in society and claim that they are going to fix it. Once they win public support, then throw out the old government.

Once the new government is in place, its the same old #. The idea of "revolution" is used by the rich to get more power once they grow tired of the old government. Nothing ever changes.

It's very machiavellian. It's also very Orwellian, as this was "the secret" that Winston Smith was reading about in the brotherhood's banned book.

[edit on 10/21/2007 by sp00n1]



reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 09:53 PM by motherofsquirrelkiller
reply to post by uberarcanist



With what the powerful, wealthy, and corrupt people like the Clinton's have, I'm sure that many of the politicians are afraid to speak out for fear of being assinated. Suicides are so 'easy' to fake for these people with money to pay professionals to clear the way toward thier political victories.


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 10:57 PM by uberarcanist
reply to post by TXMACHINEGUNDLR



So all the polls showing Hillary with a commanding lead (all of them do, BTW) are bogus?


reply posted on 22-10-2007 @ 10:31 AM by Areal51
Might as well play those videos on Comedy Central. They're as funny as anything the station regularly programs. Like corrupt politicians are "a threat to the country and the rest of the world." HAHHAHAHA!!! That's just the most ridiculous thing that anybody could say today. Why? Because 99.9% of them are corrupt. And all the damage they've caused can only be undone with long term, extremely long term, solutions. That is it. Damage and collateral damage have been done. Corrupt politician are NORMAL. Doesn't make it right, just that it is what one expects them to be.

Don't get me wrong, I'd vote for the good guy (I'm an idealist) every time , but I don't think he or she would get too far since a den of predators would be waiting to be dealt with. It kind of makes more sense to vote for the dirtiest one can find, because at least we know he or she is going to hold their own against the other.

In this day and age, I'd be surprised if this would matter on voting day. Oh, folks will scream and shout for days on end, but I doubt the effect would be rendered any differently had these allegations never surfaced. Folks already have their minds made up about who they would vote for. This is so regardless of all the sick, pedophilia, embezzlement, racketeering, fraud, coercion, and a bunch of other words that all mean the same thing, charges and allegations of the past regarding any politician.

"A dirty politician fleeces a felon." Whoo! Gonna set the house on fire with that one. Really, put this stuff on the Cartoon Network-Adult Swim. Call it, "The Felon Who Cries Mommy!" Nothing like watching Batman beat the crap out of all those jokers. Only problem is, who's Batman, really?


[edit on 22-10-2007 by Areal51]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 0 days ago with 12 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags