|
|
Topic started on 1-10-2007 @ 09:33 AM by mikesingh
|
        
What are these objects that look like living organisms in space? They have the characteristics of worms, but these glow and pulsate too! Are they
shape shifting UFOs? The ‘tether incident’ also showed up UFO’s that pulsate like huge amoebas. And these were captured in UV. No wonder one
can’t see them until they drift into the visible light spectrum!
This one’s not about those ubiquitous ‘rods’ which may be nothing more than insects buzzing across the camera lens, but huge unidentified
objects that resemble ‘living worms’ high up in our atmosphere and in space twisting and pulsating.
Some contend that the twisting objects seen in the vids below are nothing more than spent rocket boosters, waste disposal polythene containers or
pieces of the space station itself! Heck! Is it falling apart?
Here is a collection of some of these ‘creatures’ (for want of a better word!). There have been no convincing explanations thus far. Like to try
your hand at it? OK. So here goes….
1961-Pescara, Italy. This photograph was taken by Bruno Ghibaudi,
a scientific newspaper journalist at Pescara along the Adriatic sea
in April 1961.
Photograph taken on November 17, 1974 by Mr. Lauersen at
Viborg, Jutland, Denmark. The UFO resembles a jellyfish or something
shrouded in a white cloud. He took this photo as the object was
250-300 meters away.
Possibly a cloud formation? Strange shape though!
Photograph taken on 22 Sept 04 at Burlington at 4 a.m. of a
strange worm-like object.
NASA footage shot during nendezvous of Colombia with the HST
NASA footage from the space shuttle
Taken from STS-117 live feed during the undocking maneuver from the ISS when something like a worm appears in the image.
UFO/amoeba-like object on NASA control Room screen! Similar to the pulsating objects in the ‘tether incident’
NASA's explanations? None so far! Will there ever be?
As the saying goes, " There are more things in heaven and Earth than you can ever imagine…."
Cheers!
Photographs courtesy:
paranormalvortex.com...
www.burlingtonnews.net...
[edit on 1-10-2007 by mikesingh]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more General Conspiracy Discussion topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 10:00 AM by Chonx
|
Good thread, great topic
I think that life is much more versitile and much more able to survive and adapt than we currently recognise.
If you look at extreemophiles, so named because they can survive in environments which we would normally consider hostile to life, this is
demonstrated.
Personally, I don't see any reason why life would not have colonized the atmosphere and space itself and In the future we will have to update our
ideas of what constitutes life to include these exotic forms.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 01:37 PM by made2fade
|
Agreed, i see no reason against yet undiscovered organisms in the upper reaches of our atmosphere and in space.
When i first saw the Tether video, my first thought was organism.
We don't know what lives in deep ocean trenches, it's hardly surprising we don't know everthing about the upper atmosphere.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 02:05 PM by realanswers
|
Most of those things are just man made giant tube balloons. I've seen some of the videos showing them in action, but I just can't find them right
now. Balloons can get extremely high in the air. Here is proof:
youtube.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 02:14 PM by The_Guy
|
Life in open space is not possible.
No food, no warmth, no way to move in the desired direction.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 02:29 PM by jpm1602
|
Hi Guy, 'life in space is not possible'. Many of the leading theories of life on earth was that it was seeded by comets and meteors. My fav are
humanoids over Mexico videos. Discounting the possibility of life forms able to trevass space is in my opinion close minded and disengenious.
Just my 2 bull hookies. And what about the famous rods that have been documented?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 02:34 PM by omi_kron_gravitron
|
Originally posted by The_Guy
Life in open space is not possible.
No food, no warmth, no way to move in the desired direction.
an infinite number of reasons why life [as i know and understand it] could not live/survive in the space vacuum.
these objects maybe sorts of sensoring devices, or monitoring devicesor satelite probes.
also note in the second to last video, toward the end of the video, 15 seceonds left, a strobing pulsating light shooting right up from the right
side of the craft. a very faint object moving straight up and pulsating light.
[edit on 1-10-2007 by omi_kron_gravitron]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 03:01 PM by The_Guy
|
There are many objects orbiting around our planet.
The majority of them being "space junk" - debris left from satellites, shuffles and what not.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 03:54 PM by Chonx
|
  
reply to post by The_Guy
I disagree.
Your statement assumes a comprehensive understanding of Life in all its complex and infinite diversity and I don't think thats something which we, as
a species have the understanding to state.
"life finds a way" to quote jeff Goldblum's character in Jurassic Park.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 04:24 PM by The_Guy
|
Originally posted by Chonx
reply to post by The_Guy
I disagree.
Your statement assumes a comprehensive understanding of Life in all its complex and infinite diversity and I don't think thats something which we, as
a species have the understanding to state.
"life finds a way" to quote jeff Goldblum's character in Jurassic Park.
There is no "way" in the eternal Vacuum.
PS:
And are we allowed to quote Jews on a conspiracy forum?  
(Hey, this is just a joke!)
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 04:33 PM by Shades1035
|
I hear scientits say life can only evolve on planets where there is water and the correct temperature. I can not believe scientists of all people are
so ignorant. How can they be sure of that just because that happens to the current view of conditions required for earth life?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 04:37 PM by hikix
|
The first picture looks like a cricket was on the lens. And I'm pretty sure the second one is 'The Flying Spaghetti Monster'.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 04:39 PM by Chonx
|
  
reply to post by The_Guy
LOL, nice one!
My point, however, is that it would be arrogant to assume that we know enough to be able to make the assumption that its impossible for life to exist
in these places. Science is not infallible and often contradicts itself as progress is made.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 04:57 PM by _Phoenix_
|
Originally posted by Chonx
reply to post by The_Guy
LOL, nice one!
My point, however, is that it would be arrogant to assume that we know enough to be able to make the assumption that its impossible for life to exist
in these places. Science is not infallible and often contradicts itself as progress is made.
Exactly life in space is not possible for humans, how are we supposed to know if its not possible for some other life form.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 05:08 PM by ArMaP
|
Originally posted by mikesingh
The ‘tether incident’ also showed up UFO’s that pulsate like huge amoebas. And these were captured in UV. No wonder one can’t see them until
they drift into the visible light spectrum!
The "tether incident" video, in my opinion, only shows out-of-focus things. What those things
are, my guess is as good as any, being out-of-focus it is impossible to see what they are.
And the fact that it was filmed in UV does not mean that they are invisible in the "visible" spectrum.
1961-Pescara, Italy. This photograph was taken by Bruno Ghibaudi, a scientific newspaper journalist at Pescara along the Adriatic sea in
April 1961.
It looks like a grasshoper or something similar. It is clearly visible that it was nearer the camera than the waves on the
background.
Photograph taken on November 17, 1974 by Mr. Lauersen at Viborg, Jutland, Denmark. The UFO resembles a jellyfish or something shrouded in a
white cloud. He took this photo as the object was 250-300 meters away.
Probably a cloud, there are some very strangely shaped clouds, some
were posted recently on ATS.
Photograph taken on 22 Sept 04 at Burlington at 4 a.m. of a
strange worm-like object.
That could be anything, from a balloon to a real "air worm".
NASA footage shot during nendezvous of Colombia with the HST
It looks like a slightly bended piece of metal turning over
itself.
NASA footage from the space shuttle
Too hard to judge, it was too small and almost invisible.
Taken from STS-117 live feed during the undocking maneuver from the ISS when something like a worm appears in the image.
The
same as the first video, it looks like some debris.
UFO/amoeba-like object on NASA control Room screen! Similar to the pulsating objects in the ‘tether incident’
Yes, it also
looks like some out-of-focus bright object, like the one I filmed some time ago, and that it was not a UFO, and that can be seen
here.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 05:18 PM by jpm1602
|
So I suppose it would defy possiblility that some alien lifeform evolving billions of years before us could not enamor itself with a life sustaining
intergallactic method of transport. Ok sure, I see what you mean. My bad, what was I thinking?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 05:31 PM by yuefo
|
My understanding of the 2nd one is that the object is super cold, causing condensation to pour down around it. Looks cool in any event.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 10:55 PM by mikesingh
|
 
Originally posted by The_Guy
Life in open space is not possible.
No food, no warmth, no way to move in the desired direction.
And why not? Did we know that there are organisms deep in the ocean that survive in unimaginably hostile environments? Scientists didn't believe that
life was possible there, until this discovery....
Organisms living near deep-sea vents have to be able to tolerate or avoid the extreme conditions there. The pressure is immense—hundreds of times
greater than that at the ocean surface. The ocean water is just a few degrees above freezing, but fluids jetting out of seafloor vents can be tens or
hundreds of degrees hotter. Many of the chemicals in the vent fluid are extremely toxic, even at low concentrations.
venturedeepocean.org...
And there's no oxygen, no sunlight. In a nut shell, there are organisms that live in impossible conditions. Probably there are creatures out there in
space also capable of living in impossible conditions. What do we know? Next to nothing! We don't even know what the heck is going on deep in our own
oceans. Forget space.
Cheers!
[edit on 1-10-2007 by mikesingh]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 11:39 PM by takeastepback
|
There could certainly be life in outerspace. Even in a vaccum life could evolve, just as it does at the bottom of the sea under impressive amounts of
pressure.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-10-2007 @ 11:50 PM by runetang
|
Umm.. of course theres life, we already know that comets / meteors / asteroids can be made up of the stuff needed for life, and have bacteria or other
microscopic life on them.
So what if some life form evolved from comets as their base, like earth is to humans? If it had enough time, it would become something that could keep
up with the speed of the comets, something that could travel vast distances of space somehow.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |