Sometimes I get really worked up reading the replies on these types of threads. Then sometimes I really wonder how insane some of tin foil hat wearing
nuts really are

Please notice how I turn my tin foil hat to the side as I say that
I actually take serious issue with some of these remarks.
josephus maximus
apologize in advance but I have to say in all honesty, she got what was coming to her. One cant get drunk and act like an idiot when in custody of the
police. People need to start realizing this and have a little more respect for police officers. Their job is hard enough as it is.
On a good note, since she was a white woman, the poor officer will most likely be not charged with anything.
Tazers rule!!! "Hit her again!!"
I agree one can not get drunk and act like an idiot especially if you are in the custody of teh police, but how did she have this coming to her? Did
you actually watch the video? She is doing EXACTLY what this officer tells her to do and he HOLDS DOWN the trigger. That is not a "taze" that lasted
a few seconds. It was a continuous blast. So at what point is it enough? You say tazers rule hit her again....... he tazed her until she passed out.
How much farther would like him him to go? Tazer her till she dies? Is that the appropriate punishment for someone who is drunk and disorderly?
josephus maximus
Yeah it "misfired" because she shouldn't have been able to get up and walk after the first hit! HA! that is probaly why he let her have it again,
the batteries were kinda weak!
And honestly I've been tagged with one, it doesn't hurt enough to scream and cry like a little baby. It just startles you thats all.
Where I am from a comment like this would make people call you an ignorant redneck. Instead of doing that I will simply point out to you that A) you
completely contradict yourself. You say tazers do not hurt but he had to tazer her again cause she should not have been able to walk after the first
hit. Do you not see the contradiction? And B) your "tazers do not hurt" comment is dead WRONG. If you were hit with one that did not hurt I would
venture the guess that you were hit with a tazer much like
THIS ONE which is your standard $20.00 stun gun and
very common for citizens. It is about 150,000 volts and really would not hurt much but would stun you. Of course WHERE you hit someone with it is also
a factor. Tazers accessible to citizens range in power from the 150,000 up to one
LIKE THIS which is 1,000,000 volts and can
probably give you quite the jolt. Neither of these tazers are what this women was hit with.
Law enforcement use a
MUCH DIFFERENT TAZER that can not be purchased by your average
person. These Tazers shoot out small darts and give the officer a range of 35 feet or so. If you do a little research on these types of tazer, you
will learn that a 3-5 second shock can leave a person on the ground for as much as 5-10 minutes. The one in the video looks to me like the new
C2 TASER One review of this weapon for Law Enforcement says:
The new Taser C2® series has almost 100% effectiveness rating. It combines the injury reducing benefits of traditional stun technology with a
quantum leap in stopping power via new Electro-Muscular Disruption (EMD) technology. In police studies, the new Taser C2 has a higher instant
incapacitation rate than a 9mm hand gun. The Taser C2 shoots out 2 darts attached to 15 feet of wire. 50,000 volts travels over the wires and
over-rides the central nervous system providing incredible takedown power.
A higher incapacitation rate than a 9mm hand gun. Just think about that for a minute while you chant for the cop to "taze her again" and if you
still feel that way, then you sir are a sadist.
shots
Apparently this lady like some others do not feel the tazers thus deserve everything they get for not obeying the officers. I mean she was in hand
cuffs so she sould have known better then to resist further.
You are right! It was obvious to me she could not feel it while she was yelling in pain and doing what she was told! OBVIOUSLY IF she felt it she
might have fallen down and cracked her head on the side of the police car...oops she did that didn't she? I hope my sarcasm is noticed. How can you
even say that? WATCH THE VIDEO she is DOING WHAT SHE IS TOLD and the officer HOLDS THE TRIGGER to continuously shock her until she FINALLY stands up
and falls down and smacks her head on the car.
Yarcofin
How do you know she is innocent or that they aren't taking ordinary measures? You didn't see what happened prior to this footage, she could have
come at them with a knife. The fact that she didn't get out of the car when asked suggests there is obviously something else going on... police
don't just ask you to get out of the car when you get pulled over for speeding unless there is reasonable grounds to suspect something else. She
could have been driving drunk (certainly acting like it), or the car could have been stolen, you don't know, you just see 30 seconds of footage. The
fact that she didn't get out of the car makes it her own damn fault.
No she didn't come at him with a knife and I base my opinion on a little thing like THE POLICE VERSION OF EVENTS as described by various media
outlets. My question to you is what makes you think she was asked to "get out of the car"? Where do you get the impression she might have been
driving drunk? or Speeding? THE FACTS are she was never in any car but a police car. She was actually in a bar and was "ordered to leave". Maybe
before forming an opinion you should get the facts.
It is important to note that the police ADMIT that this women was tased BEFORE and AFTER she was handcuffed. If a taser is to control a suspect or
gain control of a situation why was she tased AFTER being handcuffed? Is a handcuffed person a threat? Standard Procedure requires p0olice to cuff you
BEHIND YOUR BACK so please explain to me how a person with their hands behind their back is a threat or so uncontrolable as to deserve to be Tased?
Denver Post Story
[edit on 21/9/2007 by section8citizen]