Chavez vows revenge for Falklands war, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 05:34 PM by puzzled2
Originally posted by Terapin
reply to
post by ChrisF231



The islands are under the control of the British only because they stole them by force and kicked out the legitimate inhabitants at gun point. This is a historical fact.........


erm - from that logic wouldn't the whole of the Americans have to be turned over to aboriginal people?

Back serveral hundred years the gun decided Who owns what in many places. Treaties have been written that mean the land of many north America Cities belong to Aboriginal tribes.

Don't see them getting it all back do you?

Map

When do we stop turning back the clock? coz I'm pretty sure if we go back far enough we'll find out we've murdered the owners of all the land in the world at least once.


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 05:38 PM by Terapin
reply to post by puzzled2




The difference here is that we have a nation that recognises international law, made official statements that the Falklands were indeed Argentinian territory before they took them, and have since then made official moves to give them back.

[edit on 3/9/07 by Terapin]


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 06:13 PM by puzzled2
Originally posted by Terapin
reply to
post by puzzled2




The difference here is that we have a nation that recognises international law, made official statements that the Falklands were indeed Argentinian territory before they took them, and have since then made official moves to give them back.

[edit on 3/9/07 by Terapin]


Are you saying america doesn't recognise international law or are all those treaties like the consitution ( according to quotes of Bush) just a pieces of paper?

Confused - Once the America Goevernment gives back all the Land and money for stolen "Natural Resources" to the First Nation people - then I think you should start telling other people what to do.
You could start by drawing real maps that show the land that doesn't belong to you.

But as Others here have said the quote is probably taken completely out of context and doesn't really warrent discussion. Nobody kicked off the Falklands is alived today and if they where the cost of land back then was so trival it wouldn't take much to pay them off. Or you could even let them live there as it is bound to be a better life than Argentina. Wait for the flames..


End of discussion by me. Have fun everyone and please keep exposing the truth


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 08:35 PM by Terapin
Originally posted by puzzled2
Or you could even let them live there as it is bound to be a better life than Argentina.  Wait for the flames..

British law prohibits any Argentinian from living on the Falklands and has been in effect since the British first invaded and forced out the former inhabitants. It would be nice if they allowed them the right of return but they know it will further weaken their position. That refusal of the right of return is the main reason why the UN Commission on Decolonization does not recognise the current inhabitants call for self determination. It goes against the very rules that Britain helped to write. Britain is a very important member of the UN and was significantly involved in creating the UN regulations on Decolonization.

As for the full content of  the speech Chavez recently made, I have been trying to find a copy in Spanish, but as it was a live broadcast on television, I have been unable to come up with anything yet. Pieces of it were translated and published in English language papers, but they never post the whole TV Show. It tends to be quite lengthy as Chavez likes the sound of his own voice. I will continue to search in the Spanish news outlets to see if I can find a full transcript.

( *note to Flyer: Just because I speak Spanish and Portuguese, does not mean that I am from South America or of Latino heritage as you guessed earlier. I happen to enjoy the study of languages and travel internationally on a regular basis. Unlike many I am not limited to speaking only one language and find linguistic abilities quite useful on a regular basis. I am working on Mandarin now and will be in China next month. That does not make me Chinese either. Never assume)


reply posted on 3-9-2007 @ 09:42 PM by SkipShipman
All conflicted parties are controlled by larger financial interests, whether they are entirely aware of it or not. Declassified papers have outlined how Mao Tse Dung was installed by the CIA to keep China down for so many years. Contrast Taiwan and its development with that of post WW II China to see this. When the underlying domination of the Rockefellers et al was consolidated, then they began opening China gradually while their controls increased behind the scenes.

It is arguable that this divide and conquer strategy included conveniently conflicted Islamic peoples for centuries.
Confessions of a British Spy is a good book to read to investigate this underlying strategy of the elites.

But away from general considerations and into the Chavez situation, he may well be another Marxist or Socialist who sends a few extra crumbs to the masses but answers to a higher earthly authority.

He continues to use the international banks and so forth, but his philosophy on the Falklands ignores the history of the conflict with the British. It was a time in Argentina when the "disappeared," were at issue due to the draconian government there. The issue for even the few British in the Falklands was clearly a matter of tyranny versus freedom. Besides these conflicts have a measure to keep oil in the ground and prices high. Oil runs the planet. Argentina is not his concern anyway, it is not his country.

It is all far more complicated than the statements of Chavez, who may well be just another stooge for the extreme upper echelon who prints the money and lends it out to be paid back with hard work. Improvements for impoverished people are laudable anywhere in the world, but the deeper long run outcomes are questionable in the larger chessboard.

[edit on 3-9-2007 by SkipShipman]


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 05:58 AM by BitRaiser
Originally posted by TheOmen
The pres of argentina sounds like some drunk bloke who doesn't reason or listen, and just wants to fight that other bloke for no reason.

No reason, eh?

You might want to do a little research into the US government backed corporate rape of South America.

Start here:
Honduras vs United Fruit
Bush Team linked to Venezuela Coup

And here: Bolivia's Water War

Etched deeply into the granite walls just inside the entrance of the World Bank headquarters in Washington are the words, “Our dream, a world free of poverty.” Earlier this month in Bolivia, the citizens of South America’s poorest country sent the bank a message once again that the poor aren’t too keen on the part of that dream that involves handing their water over to foreign corporations.

On January 10 the citizens of El Alto took to the streets en masse to demand that their water system, privatized in 1997 under World Bank pressure, be returned to public hands.


What you (and most of us Westerners) don't understand is that the reason that Chavez is demonized by the propaganda engine is that South America is a land ripe for plunder by the Corporate Consumption Engine. It has plentiful resources, cheap labor, and weak governments that allow all sorts of abuses to be inflicted upon their land and people.

Chavez wants that to change. He wants a united South America that can stand up for itself, develop it's own resources, and become a first world nation. What's worse is that he believes our greed driven Western Capitalist economic system to be a poor way of doing things. He believes that a Socialist system can be developed that would truly before for the people, not just the corporate elite.

Western interests simply cannot allow that to happen.
Thus, Chavez is an enemy of Corporate America and Corporate America forces their pet attack dog (the Government) to protect their interests by disrupting South American development at all costs.

Are you seeing the light yet?

Destabilized, fragmented South America = Profit
Unified, developed South America = threat


[edit on 4-9-2007 by BitRaiser]


reply posted on 4-9-2007 @ 06:18 AM by TheOmen
reply to post by BitRaiser



I see what you mean but in my eyes, thats mainly reason for attacking the US and not the UK.
Fair enough it might be that now he has the weapons, he feels the need for revenge or somthing but obviously no war is really justifiable and he seems angry at a few people!
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 3 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 15 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 2 days ago with 68 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 12 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 7 days ago with 33 member flags