The true face of terrorists in America, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 13-8-2007 @ 11:00 PM by Xtrozero
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by ChrisF231
The active duty military was not involved at Waco ... the FBI requested assistance from the Texas National Guard and they received it.



Waco is a very sore subject with me... Don't get me started on it. The government totally overplayed its hand and didn't have any, none, business doing what they did there.

What difference does it matter if they were active or reserved? They used military equipment against a civilian population.


I wouldn’t get too sore over this for the Guard is not active or reserve they are the National Guard who are controlled by each states' governor and so “posse comitatus” does not apply and so they can be used as the governor sees fit.

Our forefathers wanted it this way with the 2nd amendment “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State”. Our forefathers were all about check and balances such as having a federal military, but with civilians as the top leaders of that military. The other part was to also have a non-federal standing army to counter any possible military coups. This is where the National Guard comes into play.

I do feel sorry for Waco, but only because those poor people didn’t really understand that old David there was leading them right into his personal Armageddon. A lot is innocent people died and a lot of good agents died too.




[edit on 13-8-2007 by Xtrozero]

[edit on 13-8-2007 by Xtrozero]


reply posted on 14-8-2007 @ 04:00 AM by newyorkee
so publicly accepted and requested programs are a from of mass controll, interesting, ...........though I think that constitutionality is another issue and is in every case , case specific. As far as social spending over a inneficient military budget or one that favors that over a socialy redistributive one that embraces the world, that is a matter of philosophy to some and to others a matter of principals. Some argue that by investing in your populace you get the periferal return in the form of a highly compitent and skilled labor force. This is not in your interest when the aim is to control said populace through their lively hood. This so they produce and in effect exist only to produce and not pursue their right to happieness.When that labor force is to strong and unified(centralized) then it becomes a problem if what you are trying to do is exploit their services for a fraction of the cost. This was seen in the latin work force , where in their native lands faced true hardships just to change labor laws untouched practically since colonial times. this as well as bloodlines that through out the years only switched hands when "changing" or surrendering power. That is why they are put against so many obsticles just to legalize themselves "the correct way" Our leaders fear an active and radical lot directly voicing concerns in an articulate and effective way that could disrupt the "fish in the barrel situation" here with our work force. This in adition to the fact that latin american immigration represents people that genually care about their communities and their neighbors . They are usually participating on local boards and pta orginizations, community events for cultural awareness,which translates into community awareness. They participate in local churches , being that most are deeply spiritual and like many of us, very christian, catholic mainly. They are not evil invaders, it is the world at your doorstep, offering it self to you, do not shut the door in its face, who knows when we might come knocking....you know what I mean. We wanted these programs the way many natural born citizens wanted them. Social spending is never bad when it is an investment in those that produce for you. It can only be bad if you wish to perpetuate the imbalenced situation of abuse and exploitation. Humanity knows no nation race or creed. Our future knows none either. Embrace change. This is your world.



[edit on 14-8-2007 by newyorkee]


reply posted on 14-8-2007 @ 04:56 AM by seagull
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Originally posted by ninthaxis
Why shouldn't they migrate here if it means the opportunity to provide a better life for their families?


Better question....Why should we let them come here illegally when they dont even have the desire to make their own country better?
If they are so ready to up and leave their homeland then what benefit do you honestly think they are going to be to ours?


Couldn't have said it any better.

Legal immigration is tightly controlled, not just anyone can immigrate to the United States legally...so the question becomes why are our borders so loosely controlled so that anyone can cross just about any place north or south? Answer is economics, illegal labour is cheaper in most cases, an illegal has no recourse to labour relations or unions if he or she wants to remain incognito, so they are a very exploitable resource.

Not to say that illegals don't take advantage, because they do. Working as I do in the grocery business, I'm a sort of half-ass night manager at a fairly large supermarket. I see people all the time using public assistance, food stamp cards, and related assistance programs, because supposedly they cannot afford to buy their groceries. Yet they'll drive out of the parking lot in latest model pickups and sedans, not to mention the occasional camaro, or firebird; now I don't know what percentage of these folks were illegal, but a couple of years ago, a rumour circulated that INS was in town and checking on immigration status, it was amazing how many of these same folks were no where to be seen for almost a week. Coincidence? Something tells me, no.

Border security is, in my mind, the number one priority for the next President and Congress. There's been some movement on the issue, but no where near enough.

We need to put Congress, and the next administration, on notice of this fact, and hold their respective feet to the fire. That means constant contact via emails, letters, editorials, what ever it takes. Time is running out on this. Which the elites know maybe even better than we do.


reply posted on 14-8-2007 @ 11:16 AM by newyorkee
First of all, the elites do not know the pains we suffer better than us.

Second, The latin american populace has had more revolutionary battles and struggles for freedom than any american history book can hold. We are an active and radical lot of people that fight social injustice and take issue with the abuse of power and wealth. We have bettered our home lands and continue to do so, though the support of "democratic nations "is usually never towards our morally minded leaders. The reason why our men women and children flock to this country is because of the war and instability the american government has created on the world scene.
It is always the most evil and corrupt that seem to find the support of the U.S. leadership. Either with weapons and training to enemies of sovereign nation's governments. or with money to opposing parties in elections that would other wise be fair and truly DEMOCRATIC.

Third,and to quote:Seagull:
"Not to say that illegals don't take advantage, because they do. Working as I do in the grocery business, I'm a sort of half-ass night manager at a fairly large supermarket. I see people all the time using public assistance, food stamp cards, and related assistance programs, because supposedly they cannot afford to buy their groceries. Yet they'll drive out of the parking lot in latest model pickups and sedans, not to mention the occasional camaro, or firebird; now I don't know what percentage of these folks were illegal"

I too have worked in a grocery store which accepted wic and and food stamp. I can tell you, and swear on my mothers grave, when i say this: that over 99% of the people I met working in a grocery store, for more than 15 yrs, that used those programs, were the type to count every pennie. and trust me they had to make it count. They were'nt driving cars of any sort and in most cases took public transportation. and those that were illegal in your story, I doubt drove because they couldnt possibly have liscences. Before you go of the handle and say that the amount of falsification of drivers liscences among illegal aliens is another problem, I assure you it is not. The numbers just arent significant or greater than for any one else with a delinquent status legally.

This is not representitive of the factual standard of living a people living in relative poverty have. Compared to the standard of living of everyone else they share their communities with. Indeed, that share their communities with them. The abuses arent putting them in cars and homes better than their legal counterparts. This is a falasy. Most people on welfare are statistically women and children that need it. Most are legal americans.


reply posted on 14-8-2007 @ 12:08 PM by jsobecky
Originally posted by newyorkee
That and the fact that your children may never see you again being that you are being handcuffed in the back of Stop and shop, and cant call a babysitter or next of kin being that you are in a foreign land, and have none.

Emotional bunk. A recent ICE raid in New Bedford, MA. proves just the opposite:

The crowd gathered outside the factory today included many workers’ relatives, who said that the bulk of workers’ arrested are women. Social advocates said they contacted all the schools and day care centers in the area to ensure children weren’t abandoned.

www.immigrationwatchdog.com...

Originally posted by newyorkee
Criminals no....Our founding fathers were criminals in certain eyes of the time, that has no bearing on what they really are . Human beings that want to be american and contribute to one of the greatest countries in the world.

The US Attorney for Massachusetts summed it up quite nicely:

“It is understandable that many from around the globe would want to come to live, work and raise families here in the greatest democracy in the world. However, this must be done in compliance with U.S. immigration laws - not in violation of them,” Massachusetts U.S. Attorney Michael J. Sullivan said in a statement. “Employer accountability is essential to ensuring the integrity of the nation’s immigration system and knowingly hiring illegal immigrants is a violation of law, plain and simple, and those responsible will be prosecuted.”

Emphasis added.
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

This Hoax Effects Everyone!!!
  Political Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 55 flags
My opinion about this site's purpose
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 45 flags
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
  World War Three, Posted 13 hours ago, 29 flags
I'm sick of all the KOOKS!
  Rant, Posted 13 hours ago, 22 flags
New Topic Fire-hose censoring
  Rant, Posted 7 hours ago, 12 flags