>>Remember, it only has to be demonstrated that they allowed it to happen for it to qualify as "actionable consensus". Anything beyond that makes
that much more cause for action...<<
In an investigation you focus primarily on the prime suspect. Since Osama, not Bush, is allegidly suspect public enemy number 1, Osama should be the
focus:
1] Al Qaeda used all throughout the 90's by the CIA in the Clinton Administration engineered Bosnia/Kosovo "proxy-war" conflict, while they were
allegidly trying to capture/kill him. (Same goes for Iraq, Libya, Philippine's, etc.)
www.abovetopsecret.com...
In addition (covered in the above link), it is well documented that Al Qaeda was the product of CIA proxy wars in Afghanistan during the 80's.
2] After the 2000 pseudo-elections US intelligence agencies were ordered by the Bush Junta to back off investigating the Bin Laden's and Saudi
Royals. This revelation became clear in June 2001, before the attacks.
In addition, the connections between the Bush and Bin Laden families is beyond well documented.
link
3] Osama allowed to escape in Tora Bora, Afghanistan. The CIA Commander left the CIA 2 years short of retirement to inform the public in his book
Jawbreaker.
www.youtube.com...
more perspective, murdered Special Forces
officers
In addition, during the 90's the NSA was tracking him with his satellite phone (2000 hours of recorded Osama conversations), yet couldn't manage to
target it with a missile, which was technically feasible. That alone debunks the 911 Commission Report, and then some US officials claim that he got
away in Afghanistan because they were tracking the
same phone in the wrong direction back into the heart of Afghanistan.
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
4] Osama not on FBI wanted list for 9/11, General Richard Meyers said "it's never been about getting Osama", and Bush said "I'm not that
concerned about Osama".
www.fbi.gov...
www.informationclearinghouse.info...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
In addition, it could be argued that the Iraq War proves that 9/11 was about imperial ambitions and also conveniently ensured a full distraction to
allow Osama to never be captured while staying with "our" "allies" Pakistan.
5] Well documented 9/11 - 9/11 Commission coverup. Apologists assert that it was merely a coverup to hide their incompetence. Even the BBC "9/11
Conspiracy Files" 'truth movement hitpiece' admits at the end that there was a coverup.
www.youtube.com...
wiki - incompetence context
en.wikipedia.org...
www.youtube.com...
en.wikipedia.org...
Sorry, but to make it convincing I can't imagine it being any shorter. And that's the short version. If well rehearsed enough (any arguement of such
complexity will require rehearsal) that can be explained in roughly 90 seconds. The "In addition" parts are optional depending on your estimated
time frame and linguistic abilities.
[edit on 17-8-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]