It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zerotime
I do not believe we are affecting the weather at all.
On the other hand, I do believe we should be cutting our dependence on oil. At this point in history to not have cleaner burning energy like solar and wind power is crazy. We should not pollute the air, water or land. We do need to clean up our act for our own general health benefits.
The report, by more than 2,000 top scientists, says world temperatures could increase by 3C by 2100.
US Energy Secretary Sam Bodman said he accepted the conclusions of the scientists.
"We're very pleased with it. We're embracing it. We agree with it," he said.
"Human activity is contributing to changes in our Earth's climate and that issue is no longer up for debate."
Now, the panel concluded that it was at least 90% certain that human emissions of greenhouse gases rather than natural variations are warming the planet's surface.
Originally posted by neformore
Thats 2,000 people who's business it is to catalogue, record and analyse whats happening - and incidentally alot of those 2,000 people were offered $10,000 each by Exxon Mobile to shout the report down.
Originally posted by LogansRun
....................
I am interested to see how the nay sayers respond to this as there are still many skeptics out there who claim it is a natural warming. The only credible scientific reports to counter global warming seem to come from scientists on the payrolls of such corporations as Exxon and Shell.
...................
Earth's Magnetic Field Is Fading
John Roach
for National Geographic News
September 9, 2004
Earth's magnetic field is fading. Today it is about 10 percent weaker than it was when German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss started keeping tabs on it in 1845, scientists say.
If the trend continues, the field may collapse altogether and then reverse. Compasses would point south instead of north.
Originally posted by Muadib
Would you actually care to back up such a claim that all people who doubt the whole "climate change is caused by man" are paid by Exxon, Shell or any other agency to claim this?...
First of all, not all people, and scientists, who don't agree with the theory that man is the cause for global warming, doubt that there is a climate change on the making....
Originally posted by Muaddib
Would you actually care to back up such a claim that all people who doubt the whole "climate change is caused by man" are paid by Exxon, Shell or any other agency to claim this?...
Originally posted by Muaddib
First of all, not all people, and scientists, who don't agree with the theory that man is the cause for global warming, doubt that there is a climate change on the making....
Originally posted by Muaddib
People, and scientists can believe and know that Climate Change is happening as we speak, and still believe that mankind is not the cause....
Second of all, there is much data to refute the idea that mankind is the cause of global warming. Take as an example borehole temperatures.
Originally posted by Muaddib
It is kind of a coincidence, and I don't believe in coincidences but anyways, it is kind of a coincidence that the Earth's magnetic field had been relatively stable before "the middle of the 1800s", but has been weakening significantly since then.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Anyways, the data in my opinion clearly shows that the changes that we are going through started apparently from the Earth's core outwards, and not only that, but every planet in the solar system with an atmosphere has been going through some dramatic climate changes lately.
Originally posted by Muaddib
The thing is that many people, and this includes various scientists, need to believe that "mankind is at fault", for the simple reason that it gives them a sense of control. If mankind is at fault, then mankind can stop it right?...
Originally posted by Muaddib
I have been saying it for a while now, instead of using millions and billions of dollars trying to put the blame on mankind, the governments of the world should be using that money for contigency plans, because the changes that are coming, and we can't stop, are not going to be a "walk in the park" by any means... and if we don't have any contigency plans, a lot of people are going to suffer.
[edit on 3-2-2007 by Muaddib]
Originally posted by khunmoon
Here's a link about AEI, the American Enterprise Institute, the intellectual Cosa Nostra Big oil has staitioned to protect their prospects in the White House. About how they offered money. Only 10 grants... who did they think they were dealing with? ...the milkboy? I'm really disappointed as to the amount.
How much was it Exxon just has presented in profit for last Q?
Originally posted by khunmoon
----------
You know Maudib, we might have a hard time agreeing, but as for the reasons of GW, I'm openminded all the way, and I can agree with you some of the way. On climate change though I must disagree. For sure there's one like we havn't seen them in 12.000 years in the making.
Originally posted by khunmoon
For this impressive post I actually think you deserve to be applauded. And thanks for the links.
Just remember, when you believe it is because you don't know. There's nothing to believe if you know.
So to the scare. First, the UN implies that carbon dioxide ended the last four ice ages. It displays two 450,000-year graphs: a sawtooth curve of temperature and a sawtooth of airborne CO2 that's scaled to look similar. Usually, similar curves are superimposed for comparison. The UN didn't do that. If it had, the truth would have shown: the changes in temperature preceded the changes in CO2 levels.
Next, the UN abolished the medieval warm period (the global warming at the end of the First Millennium AD). In 1995, David Deming, a geoscientist at the University of Oklahoma, had written an article reconstructing 150 years of North American temperatures from borehole data. He later wrote: "With the publication of the article in Science, I gained significant credibility in the community of scientists working on climate change. They thought I was one of them, someone who would pervert science in the service of social and political causes. One of them let his guard down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global warming sent me an astonishing email that said: 'We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.' "
So they did. The UN's second assessment report, in 1996, showed a 1,000-year graph demonstrating that temperature in the Middle Ages was warmer than today. But the 2001 report contained a new graph showing no medieval warm period. It wrongly concluded that the 20th century was the warmest for 1,000 years. The graph looked like an ice hockey-stick. The wrongly flat AD1000-AD1900 temperature line was the shaft: the uptick from 1900 to 2000 was the blade. Here's how they did it:
....
While most of official Washington was captivated with the fight on the Senate floor to pass an energy bill before Congress left town for its August vacation, a vicious campaign was under way behind the scenes to smear two leading scientists for pointing out serious flaws in the science behind the theory of human-caused climate change.
The targets were Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas, both astrophysicists at Harvard, who were characterized as fringe scientists whose work should be ignored. What did they do to attract such characterizations? They had the audacity to pull back the curtain on the wizard of global warming.
The issue focuses on a paper by them that supports the widely held view that the climate of the last millennium has been quite variable and includes a Medieval Warm Period and subsequent Little Ice Age. This is only controversial because it, and the wider body of scientific literature that exists, directly contradicts recent research by Michael Mann, a leading global warming proponent. Mr. Mann argues global air temperatures have been stable over the last 1,000 years, with the exception of the last 100. It is the "Mann-made" warming to which Mr. Soon and Ms. Baliunas have objected.
While most of these arguments are confined to academic discussions that the general public would find less than boring, this fight played out recently in front of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works. It has also been echoed in several news accounts from academic journals to the New York Times.
ST. PETERSBURG, January 15 (RIA Novosti) - Rising levels of carbon dioxide and other gases emitted through human activities, believed by scientists to trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, are an effect rather than the cause of global warming, a prominent Russian scientist said Monday.
Habibullo Abdusamatov, head of the space research laboratory at the St. Petersburg-based Pulkovo Observatory, said global warming stems from an increase in the sun's activity. His view contradicts the international scientific consensus that climate change is attributable to the emission of greenhouse gases generated by industrial activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.
On the causes of climate change, he writes in a section entitled "Conclusion: The greenhouse effect is not the cause of climate change": "The possible causes, then, of climate change are: well-established orbital parameters on the palaeoclimatic scale, with climatic consequences slowed by the inertial effect of glacial accumulations; solar activity, thought by some to be responsible for half of the 0.6°C rise in temperature, and by others to be responsible for all of it, which situation certainly calls for further analysis; volcanism and its associated aerosols (and especially sulphates), whose (short-term) effects are indubitable; and far at the rear, the greenhouse effect, and in particular that caused by water vapor, the extent of its influence being unknown. These factors are working together all the time, and it seems difficult to unravel the relative importance of their respective influences upon climatic evolution. Equally, it is tendentious to highlight the anthropic factor, which is, clearly, the least credible among all those previously mentioned." (Leroux 2005, p. 120)
Originally posted by Muaddib
Appart from David Deming here are some people I just found by doing "some research".
from source link
FUNDING
National Center for Policy Analysis has received $390,900 from ExxonMobil since 1998.
1998
$65,900 ExxonMobil Corporate Giving
Source: ExxonMobil 1998 grants list
2000
$30,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
general support
Source: ExxonMobil Foundation 2000 IRS 990
2001
$40,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
Source: ExxonMobil 2001 Annual Report
2002
$30,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
Source: ExxonMobil 2002 Annual Report
2003
$75,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
Source: ExxonMobil 2003 Corporate Giving Report
2004
$75,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
Source: Exxon Giving Report 2004
2005
$75,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
Source: ExxonMobil 2005 DIMENSIONS Report (Corporate Giving)
KEY PEOPLE
James C. Thompson Jr.
Director
Source: NCPA website 4/04
Sandy Liddy Bourne
E-Team Expert
Source: NCPA website 4/04
David Deming
Adjunct Scholar, "E-Team"
Source: NCPA website 4/04
Originally posted by Muaddib
Two other researchers who have been victims of the present "witch hunt".
While most of official Washington was captivated with the fight on the Senate floor to pass an energy bill before Congress left town for its August vacation, a vicious campaign was under way behind the scenes to smear two leading scientists for pointing out serious flaws in the science behind the theory of human-caused climate change.
The targets were Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas, both astrophysicists at Harvard, who were characterized as fringe scientists whose work should be ignored. What did they do to attract such characterizations? They had the audacity to pull back the curtain on the wizard of global warming.
There is Zbigniew Jaworowski, Frederick Seitz, Fred Singer, Nir Shaviv, William M. Gray, etc, the list is extensive yet the media says pretty much nothing on the research these people have done.
U.N. says there's no stopping global warming
Report also says climate change is 'very likely' the result of human activities.
By Thomas H. Maugh II, Times Staff Writer
February 2, 2007
In the strongest language it has ever used, a United Nations panel says global warming is "very likely" caused by human activities and has become a runaway train that cannot be stopped.
The warming of Earth and increases in sea levels "would continue for centuries … even if greenhouse gas concentrations were to be stabilized," according to a 20-page summary of the report that was leaked to wire services.
The summary of the fourth report by the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, was scheduled for release this morning in Paris. But scientists involved in the final editing process have been leaking bits and pieces from it all week, culminating in the leaking of the full report eight hours before its release.
Originally posted by LogansRun
LMAO - David Demming?! This link describes the NCPA and its funding source.
................
Originally posted by Muaddib
But I also wonder why you didn't try to do the same to the other scientists I excerpted from...i guess they all are paid to say those things..... and I guess the IPCC and Mann were not caught red handed in trying to change history and coming up with the claim mankind is at fault using a graph which they rigged to disregard the Middle Ages warming, and the little Ice age which came after....among some other data...
LMAO?..... yeah...I am LMAO....
[edit on 3-2-2007 by Muaddib]
Heidi Cullen
Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics
By US Senate Environment and Public Works
Thursday, January 18, 2007
The Weather Channel's most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to "Holocaust Deniers" and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.
The Weather Channel's (TWC) Heidi Cullen, who hosts the weekly global warming program "The Climate Code," is advocating that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revoke their "Seal of Approval" for any television weatherman who expresses skepticism that human activity is creating a climate catastrophe.
Originally posted by LogansRun
Believe what you will about the info I posted. Again, this thread is about us not being able to stop it at this point, not to debate its existance or its causes.
Originally posted by LogansRun
I didn't do that to the other scientists because they aren't necessaraly on the exxon payroll - that doesn't make them right. There are scientists out there that also claim that the earth is only a few thousand years old. As I said, man is not the CAUSE but rather a contributor - a big one.
Originally posted by Muaddib
The whole claim that mankind is behind runaway global warming, as I have stated and I have excerpted a million times already came from the Hockey stick Graph, presented by Mann.