Black Caucus: Whites Not Allowed, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 23-1-2007 @ 10:04 PM by sky1
I cannot argue with that, you are very much correct.



reply posted on 24-1-2007 @ 07:29 AM by Wolfpack 51
Racism will always exist.

People choose to be with those like themselves.

Reguardless of color, though color has binding issues to each group.

Some even who consider themselves non-racist because they, attend a mixed church, or organization will still have reservations if they see a group, whether of one color or of on common theme that they view as a threat.

I know that this race issue isnt fair.

I have kids in college and because of my color they cannot get grants, and their financial aid is limited based on their father. Other kids of different color get grants, even when their fathers are much more well to do than me. They get special assistance based on race.

This is not fair to anyone.

Lets take color out of the picture, level the playing field for all.

The majority of "Whites" are not rich and powerful. They are a class of working people that have the same needs as any other group. Since it is viewed by minoritys' that the "Whites are in Power", and they have organized to get "special treatment', the vast majority of whites have to actually pull a tougher plow to get through life. No special grants, no affermative actions, no welfare (even when your kids need help).

Yes lets take away the isolationist. No "Black only groups", Latino only groups" or any other group. At least in a public forum.

If this is unacceptable, then it is time that the whites unite as a group to gain political clout to get some of the "special treatments this country offers to minoritys and illegals.


reply posted on 24-1-2007 @ 09:43 AM by WyrdeOne
So y'all want the women's caucus to invite men?

What's the point of a caucus at all then?

Now that's a good question...



I don't think there's any good reason to draw lines of division, there are plenty of those already in place - racism doesn't need our help to flourish.

As a white male, there are tons of scholarships for which I just wasn't eligible. It sucked. I had above-average intelligence, exhibited financial hardship, participated in extra-curicular activities, posessed excellent communication skills, and I couldn't get a scholarship to save my life.

Equal opportunity is a simple enough concept, how did it get so twisted? Leveling the playing field by screwing over innocent people? Great idea...



How about that notion that all white folks are wealthy, and can afford college. Can we dispel that myth right now, please? The vast majority of people in this country are white, and generally speaking only a small percentage of them can afford to go to college without financial assistance.

If you're like me, white male, Scots/Irish, you get to apply for crippling loans while a bunch of other kids ride free because they look good on the diversity report, because the scholarship people are more interested in affirmative action than equal opportunity, because maintaining the appearance of progressive reform is more important than actually changing the way people think.

If you have intelligence, and you have an interest in getting a higher education, but lack the funds to make that possible, what makes you any more or less qualified to receive assistance than another person in similar circumstances who happens to have a different skin color?

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY. Not a hard concept in theory, but in practice it seems to fall apart...


reply posted on 24-1-2007 @ 10:25 AM by Benevolent Heretic
I think we need to define Caucus.


A closed meeting of party members within a legislative body to decide on questions of policy or leadership.


If it's a closed meeting of a particular group, then a white man has no place in a black caucus. It's still racist (as his exclusion is based on race) but I understand it it a little better. And a man has no place in a woman's caucus. It's still sexist and separatist, though.

If the meaning of Caucus is:


A group within a legislative or decision-making body seeking to represent a specific interest or influence a particular area of policy



Dictionary

Then the white guy who has a black constituency has every right (and I would submit, responsibility) to be in there. And a woman's caucus, formed to represent the interests of women should include both sexes because ALL representatives have women in their districts.
...
In any case, I think it's a mistake to exclude a man because of his race or a person because of his gender. It feeds racism, sexism, encourages separateness, and what harm would be done? Would it break some kind of black code? Is the white guy going to run out and tell all the other white people in Congress the secrets of the black people???

Loam, I agree with you. The guy handled it with grace and dignity and I can tell his heart is in the right place.


reply posted on 24-1-2007 @ 11:22 AM by missed_gear
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
If it's a closed meeting of a particular group, then a white man has no place in a black caucus.


This may sound true on the surface via definition, but it is not that simple as caucuses actually define themselves.

Caucuses do represent certain interest(s), purpose(s) etc., however one will find the root function of the caucus defined within their mission or mission statements.

In the case of the CBC it is to eradicate African-American and white-American
disparities:

Since the formation of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), the core mission of the CBC has been to close (and, ultimately, to eliminate) disparities that exist between African-Americans and white Americans in every aspect of life.
Congressional Black Caucus


If their "core mission" is truly to do as above…this caucus must realize to attain their goal whites must eventually be included in their caucus.

Do not their current actions, after nearly 40 years from founding, make them complicit in wafting the stench of “skinned” racism at the expense of stepping forward to realize the end goal of eliminating inequalities? Hence this why it is seen by some as hypocrisy.



mg
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags