china troop build up in mexico

quote from greenkoolaid's post at page 2:

"For china, 90000 soldiers is like a scouting party. Keep in mind that they have 1.4 billion people. They like to abort their females there so most of those are men. That means they have about 800,000,000 men to the USs roughly 150,000,000.

You throw in Russia with all of its nukes and weapons and this spells bad news for the US.

Not a fun scenario to think about. "




surprisingly, indeed surprisingly i found out when most Chinese nowadays are thinking of how to coprate with other country and improve its enconomy and civilization while a lot of u here still trying to make the cold war countinued to live.
well what can i say here as a Chinese? go to China urself if not try to make some Chinese friends(if still not try to know it by true seeing but not listening and those horrible story from net). isn't that reasonable for u?



[Edited on 18-3-2004 by taobo33]

[Edited on 18-3-2004 by taobo33]

[Edited on 18-3-2004 by taobo33]

this is stupid- if we had a slanty eyed troop invasion from mexico it wouldn't take a genious to tell where they were from.. we would just send up a horde of ICBMs their way...

There is NO WAY that story is true if you beleive it you are incredibly gullible...

[Edited on 17-3-2004 by Friar]

"slanty eyed troop invasion" ???

Show some class asswipe.

[Edited on 17-3-2004 by Facefirst]

Originally posted by Leveller
It's all true, I swear.

lmao

Also, I heard that the invasion was delayed because 88,000 of the 90,000 troops in Mexico came down with Montezuma's Revenge.

Apparently Chinese military training didn't include "Don't drink the water"

Originally posted by HowardRoark
They would have attacked last month but they all had Montezuma's Revenge.

DOH! You beat me to it.

taobo33, I find that quite amusing what you said, not to be rude but, it is. Yes, by shear force China is a threat, but then you said Russia and all of it's nukes. You do now that, just because they nuke us, doesn't mean we can't nuke them back right? It's not like a game of Duck Duck Goose. Russia doesn't slap our head and say Goose and we just sit there go oh well, game over they win I'll be danged. Besides, resulting to Nuclear Warfare is the worst thing you can do, it's a food fight in your Grade School Caferteria. The cool kids start throwin the food, then everyone else starts to sling it just because they won't wanna be left out.

I mean, the Powers launch the nukes, and everyone else doesn't wanna be on the losing side so they launch at who they think our the enemies. Keep in mind, even if USA was destroyed by nuclear attack, devasted, we could still launch back. To manage to cripple every single nuke silo and sub from the USA is a feat upon itself, not to mention the gohana's it takes to even launch a nuke now a days without reprecussions from the rest of the world, especially the liberials.

I highly, highly doubt a Chinese build up is occurring on the US/Mex Border.

The US and China have too much to gain by being "buddies" than adversaries. Neither stands anything to gain by going to war.

That being said, the two biggest kids on the block usually have it out at some point.

I don't consider China the biggest kid in the block in real terms. Sure, they are a huge country, but, the biggest kid on the block typically has the best toys which, China is the poor kid in this arena.

Rabid,

The whole world beat the kid with the best toys on the block in WWII by shear numbers and man power.

China has sheer numbers and manpower that no one nation can currently even come close to matching.

I'm sorry, but to use those sheer numbers you must cross the block. China has no Safe Zone's capable of a build up like WW2.

*edited...Meant to add this. The whole world beat the kid with some of the best toys, but it's just China. Not Europe and Russia.

[Edited on 17-3-2004 by RabidGoose]

I am not sure of your point, but I assume you mean an assembly area?

We had to bring the fight to the Nazis. What makes you think we would not have to bring the fight to the Chinese?

What, on God's Green Earth, type of sceniro would we have to fight the chinease on bringing the fight over there? Something on that Drastic of a measure would have the whole world in an Up Roar. I'm sorry, Iraq was an easy slap on the bottom to do, you had safe zones to do, the worlds support wasn't needed. They had oil and other reasons. China's reason to need a slap on the bottom would be, what? I'd like to see a sceniro.

Also, I'm trying to find the post but it showed how much workers China has to the world and then how much productive work force they do compared to the U.S. It's amazing on the difference, China could cause Economic Uproar. Economicaly, China has the world by the Gonad's by offering some very cheap labor and a lot of it.

By WWII "kid with best toys" I was speaking of Germany.

It was not just "Europe." Germany came within an inch of taking over all of Europe.


[Edited on 17-3-2004 by Facefirst]

I am speaking about hypothetical possibilities. The Taiwan stituation alone is a very interesting one.

Yes, China has a very strong industry as does the US. History has shown time and time again that this competition can often lead to conflict. just something to keep an open mind about.

Yes, I know that. Panzer was by far the best toy, especially considering some U.S. Army Tanks had their bullets bounced off when they fired into the front of the Panzer. Germany lost mainly because they took the treaty out with the Soviet Union and then slapped them in the face with it, after they pissed on it. The Big Red Machine was, and still is, something you don't want to have angry at you.

China, on the other hand, would have a major problem in controling their numbers. Like the Battle, I forget the name I hate it when I do that, he beat the army over 6 or 7 times his size because they followed orders to the letter. Since they cut the snake's head off, attacking the leader with a severe flank and hitting him in the back and causing him to run, the other leaders did not know this. They were scared to death to even risk giving orders and then got slaughtered easily. Numbers being controlled by fear is the worst way to control them. If China had US Communications Technology coming out, I'd fear China would already probably start dominating the world. Numbers, especially since like someone said before their populous is men, would be a plague upon this world.

China has a strict discipline, but they lack the ability of a Navy, even yet a Navy compared to the USA. I don't mean to talk like USA is the best, they may have the best Navy or not, but one thing is sure they are in the top 5. I'm not sure on that, but I know the USA is preddy high up there, especially when compared to China.

I do, however, believe China could easily take over Taiwan, within two days at the most. A blitz landing and Air power, heck even swimming over there, would make Taiwan just cry.

Also, maybe we should u2u about this as not to inflate this thread with banter back and forth, that's if you want too. I like throwing sceniro's back n forth.

[Edited on 17-3-2004 by RabidGoose]

I find it strange that people speak of a physical invasion by China. The Japanese tried the same thing, which prompted us to enter WWII (we planned it that way of course). The funny part is, they did end up winning. They won through product recognition and support.

I see the technological dominance of the Japanese as a much more significant domination than if they were to physically dominate other countries - money is more important to people than physically dominating a piece of land and people because you can buy land and dominate it just by having the money to do so, no troops needed. Look at Hawaii. They dominate America virtually and in some respects, physically, but with no troops.

I could say the same thing about the Chinese. They are doing the same thing. Although I think their military ambitions take over pure logic sometimes - such as their need to control Taiwan again (Taiwan is another virtually dominate power in the world and yet it is so small). I'm sure the Socialists (it isn't a true Communist country, there has never been one) "leaders" of China would love to dominate more land though. Thats the nature of greed and power though. The "leaders" are the ones who have ambitions of conquering, the people are just conditioned to follow.

I definately see the Chinese "leaders" stilll wanting to conquer the world. The supposed Chinese troop build up on the Mexican border could be entirely plausible. The "leaders" of America could be allowing the troop build up so it will enable them to prompt the start of WWIII. This could be one of the defining factors of NWO initialization. And you say, where is the media? Remember, the media only reports what it is allowed to report.

Originally posted by RabidGoose
taobo33, I find that quite amusing what you said, not to be rude but, it is. Yes, by shear force China is a threat, but then you said Russia and all of it's nukes. You do now that, just because they nuke us, doesn't mean we can't nuke them back right? It's not like a game of Duck Duck Goose. Russia doesn't slap our head and say Goose and we just sit there go oh well, game over they win I'll be danged. Besides, resulting to Nuclear Warfare is the worst thing you can do, it's a food fight in your Grade School Caferteria. The cool kids start throwin the food, then everyone else starts to sling it just because they won't wanna be left out.

I mean, the Powers launch the nukes, and everyone else doesn't wanna be on the losing side so they launch at who they think our the enemies. Keep in mind, even if USA was destroyed by nuclear attack, devasted, we could still launch back. To manage to cripple every single nuke silo and sub from the USA is a feat upon itself, not to mention the gohana's it takes to even launch a nuke now a days without reprecussions from the rest of the world, especially the liberials.

hi :
i think i just said i want more americans can go to China and have a look for themselves. did i mentioned the nuke?
China is the only country in the world have capitalism and communism within one country, what more do u want?
pick a holiday and go there for urself before u countinue to say sth about China and believe sth about China cause i know there are too many funny story about it. i can't see any offensive form this, u?
well thanks for any ideas

First things first, you mentioned nukes, CLEARLY mentioned them. You said, I don't know how to work quotes so...'Throw in Russia and all their nukes.' So, what did you mean by that?

And Capitilism and Communism under the same house? Oh, I defintly wanna see how you get this. As for the rest of what you said, I regret I didn't understand a single word. Sorry. But really, please do explain how Capitilism and Communism is within a Communist type of government.

Originally posted by RabidGoose
First things first, you mentioned nukes, CLEARLY mentioned them. You said, I don't know how to work quotes so...'Throw in Russia and all their nukes.' So, what did you mean by that?

And Capitilism and Communism under the same house? Oh, I defintly wanna see how you get this. As for the rest of what you said, I regret I didn't understand a single word. Sorry. But really, please do explain how Capitilism and Communism is within a Communist type of government.

Two words: Hong Kong - although China is trying to convert Hong Kong back into a Socialist ruled government, the residents of Hong Kong will have none of it (that won't last long though, China always wins in the end : ).

As for why I know China has never been a Communist government, read the Communist Manifesto and you will understand why - no country in the world has ever been a Communist government. Communism has and will always be a pipe dream utopia. As long as there is greed and power seekers in the world, Communism will never work.



[Edited on 3-18-2004 by EmbryonicEssence]