Wow, this one is RIPE for abuse.
How did an earlier member phrase it?....ok; lets say "Muhammad Muhammad Akbar" or "Muhammad Muhammad Al-Jazera" (

) sends our "good
American" (who has done
nothing wrong and has
nothing to fear) a letter detailing some new and nefarious terrorist plot.
For arguments sake; lets also say that, durring the prior week, elements of law enforcement recieved an anonymous phone call claiming that our "good
American" has been "acting strange", or that he/she may be a "sympathiser" of terrorists.
With this tip off; it's noticed that our "good American" has been sent an unusual letter so it is now opened. That's ok because our "good
American" has "nothing" to hide, right? I mean; our "good American" hasn't even
recieved the letter yet.
If we assume that our enforcement agencies are to actually
use their "new powers", then our "good American" would now be arrested (merely
for
suspicion) as an "enemy combatant". This supposed plot
must be properly investigated like all others, should it not?
Now comes the catch. Because of mere
suspicion; our "good American" has been arrested/accused as an enemy combatant, and can now be detained
indefinitely, without habeas corpus, or access to a lawyer.
How much waterboarding do you think it will take before our diligent investigators truly believe our "good American's" story of innocence (knowing
nothing about the letter) when they have the tip-off call, the letter, and who knows what else as evidence in hand?
Personally, I think that our
good Americans have the
most to fear with this.
I hope none of you have ticked anyone off (especially if they "hold a grudge") cuz this one could get ugly.
[edit on 1/8/07 by redmage]