reply to post by xpert11
Umm I think Ron would have the states do the likes of inspecting toys and food etc rather then the Federal government . Global Warming
is a fraud enough said. Plus I am still curious as to your thoughts concerning Ron fund raising and the need for CFR.
1) Yes, on leaving responsibility in the states. You know already I have little to no regard for the states. If left to me, I’d reduce them to
mere zip codes. I subscribe to the opening line in the Preamble to the United States Constitution, “We the people of the United States, in order to
form a more perfect union . . . “ Or even to the Pledge of Allegiance which before 1954 closed with these words, “ . . one nation, indivisible and
with liberty and justice for all” as originally written before Eisenhower Republicans added “under God” in appreciation for wining the first
election since 1932.
2) Global warming whether real or fraudulent, will nevertheless bring about unpredictable changes in the earth’s weather patterns in the next
decade that could be worse than the ravages of World War Two. I suspect we have already passed the “tipping point” and not much can be done about
it. Note: I’m reading
“Floods, Famines and Emperors” by Brian Fagan. He discusses the last 15,000 years of earth’s climatology
in some interesting detail using many written records, ice and mud cores and tree rings studies.
3) Fund raising in today’s environment while relevant to CFR does not lend itself to immediate analogy. For sure, the potential of the internet
is just beginning to be felt. How long before we vote on the internet? Perhaps America’s 45-50% participation could suddenly shoot to 90%+? We have
been told the “insiders” do not want that. Mass voter participation. Nor do they want easy access by voters. Florida still has the infamous list
of 35,000 ex-felons of which 80% are black, used to keep from voting. And which no one is notified until he or she attempts to vote. And which we
learned the list was prepared by Republicans who took indictments and not convictions as the basis for the list. Many of those cases were dismissed
and others were amended down to misdemeanors which are not disqualifying. Another reason I don't “love” Republicans.
Campaign Finance Reform should stand on its own. Done property and not emasculated as has happened every time in the past, every person who wants
to run and who could acquire enough signatures on a petition, would be given equal opportunity to make his or her case. Yes, there might be 10,000
candidates, but a series of pre-primaries could reduce that to a workable number. If we can go to the Moon and back, we can figure this one too. If
we want to. Unfortunately, as in our health care, immigration and our anti-terrorism boondoggle, it will have to get worse before it can get better.
IMO.
And One More Thing: Why I’m not a state’s rights conservative. Federal law prohibits garnishment of “public benefits” deposited into
banks. By law social security, SSI, and veteran’s disability benefits are considered to be “public benefits.”
The Bank of America in California has engaged in a practice of charging overdraft fees ($35) and other service fees against the next direct
deposit into the client’s account, regardless of he origin of the deposit. The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) filed suit in
California to stop the practice and recoup the wrongfully deducted fees.
The California state trial court found in the plaintiffs favor and awarded $296 million against the Bank of America, based on a 4 year statute of
limitation. The Bank appealed to the state Appeals Court arguing it would put an undue hardship on the Bank to know the source of each direct
deposit. (
That’s a patent lie. My checks are direct deposited and are marked as such by my bank, Wachovia).
The California state Appeals Court agreed with the Bank of America and reversed the judgment. The AARP has appealed to the California Supreme
Court. Aside: Republican appointed judges will rule against the little people, while Democratic appointed judges will rule against the Bank. This is
why there is so much fighting over judicial appointments at both state and Federal level. Rights granted by Congress are rendered worthless when you
have Republican judges to enforce them. End.
Advice? The AARP says if you have been victimized by illegal deductions by your Federally regulated bank contact your local Legal Aid office.
Another joke on the poor. In Louisville, a municipality of 750,000 people, the Legal Aid Society had 5 lawyers on staff. They spent most of their time
on spouse abuse cases, non-payment of child support and landlord and tenant eviction cases. (Public Defenders represent the poor in criminal cases.
Also grossly under-staffed and under-paid). For a “free” divorce, there’s a 2 years waiting list. This kind of case would have a very low
priority. Oh, by the by, the Social Security Administration REQUIRES you to have your monthly check direct deposited as does the Veterans
Administration. From the AARP monthly
“Bulletin” for December, 2007, at page 34.
Q. How would the always touted free market resolve this issue?
Check out my thread, “Atlanta - The First City In America To Shut-down?”
[edit on 12/19/2007 by donwhite]