It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by Justin Oldham
I'm not at all pleased to see the party of my choice going down in flames. the more I learn about how to self-promote, the more I question other people's authority. In the democratic sense, I do think there is a moral imperative when it comes to government. That moral imperative, to me, boils down to just one thing. Do no harm. I respect the Constitution and the limits it originally placed on Federal authority. I see the need for many of the amendments that have been added. I really do think that the Federal government is significantly beyond its mandate.
That's why I wrote my first book after leaving Federal service. It's more than a good story to me. It’s an encapsulation of what I believe. I have yet to meet the ideological liberal who could embrace it. For that reason, I pay much closer attention to what the opposition says when I debate. I wish that my fellow Republicans could be so circumspect. Opposition does not always mean 'wrong.' The GOP's slavish loyalty to a 'wrong' President will cost them dearly. I learned one great truth in my college career, which I sharpened during my stint as a writer. Most ideas about just about any subject you can name transcend ideology. Right is right and wrong really is wrong. That's why we call it that...instead of something else.
Gore said in 1988 that his experience in Vietnam:
didn't change my conclusions about the war being a terrible mistake, but it struck me that opponents to the war, including myself, really did not take into account the fact that there were an awful lot of South Vietnamese who desperately wanted to hang on to what they called freedom. Coming face to face with those sentiments expressed by people who did the laundry and ran the restaurants and worked in the fields was something I was naively unprepared for
posted by Xpert11
Other then McCain who's campaign looks to be as good as dead do any of the Republican candidates have any real conviction when they support the war in Iraq or do they support they war because there party has forced it self into a corner? Ron Paul is naturally excluded from the question.
posted by Justin Oldham
When FDR got us in to WW2, The Dems had to carry the water for that conflict, and it was hard. They were slaves to it in much that same way that Bush and the Republicans are today. Same way for Truman and that little fracas in Korea. LBJ and Nixon in Vietnam. It's hard for national political figures to admit that they were wrong. We, the common, are expected to admit our mistakes and move on. They on the other hand, are much more vulnerable to the sin of pride.
Originally posted by Justin Oldham
When a member of your party is a sitting President, they are traditionaly thought of as the 'head' of your party. that's how its currrently done here in America.
When FDR got us in to WW2, The Dems had to carry the water for that conflict, and it was hard. They were slaves to it in much that same way that Bush and the Republicans are today. Same way for Truman and that little fracus in Korea. LBJ and Nixon in Vietnam.
posted by xpert11
This thread never fails to hold my interest . Justin comments about the President being traditionally thought of as the 'head' of your party could be interpreted as the British parliamentary system in drag until you stumble upon the fact that the President doesn't need his or party to have a majority in order to govern.
While I'm no fan of Truman policy in Korea and the outcome of that war his actions don’t compare to the later blunders of LBJ and Bush. The end of the Korean War does have some relevance today in terms of the partisan hacks that accuse the Dems of being defeatists. What many of the right wing partisan hacks forgot is that Ike put an end to the war in Korea without achieving victory. Now the are two reasons Ike has escaped such mud slinging the first is his record as a five star general in Europe. The second reason is simply selective memory.
In post war Japan MacArthur was smart enough to retain Hirohito as a sort figure head much like the Queen of England is to commonwealth countries. Of course Hirohito played ball and avoid being tried as an war criminal. When people compare the future of Iraq to that of post war Japan they fail to grasp that there is no Hirohito in Iraq. Don I think that in post war Japan the Americans were also selective about who could run for office mind you MacArthur could also ban journalists from entering the country and the media was subject to censorship.
posted by Justin Oldham
I've been doing a little homework regarding Fred Thompson and I now suspect that he is waiting 'til the end of September to make his grand entrance. I think he may have been talking to Newt about that guerilla campaign option that Mr. G has been going on about so much over the last year.
posted by Justin Oldham
I'm guessing that Newt got to Thompson. He may have been convinced to wait until after the Republican caucus meets in late September to announce. This is the very strategy that Gingrich himself laid out for his own run last year. the insurgent campaign. the chief advantage of which is that he contender can run hard and fast on just a few million dollars right before the '08 primaries.
I think the old guard that runs the GOP has already settled on Giuliani to be their sacrificial lamb. They haven't contested his liberal stands on anything because they don't expect him to win. At best, Thompson gets to be his running mate. At worst, Fred doesn't run at all.
posted by xpert11
Fred seems to be right up side show alley. I mean come on how swallow are people or the system that allows Fred and Newt to stir up Republican supporters and the media. Fred must be a part of the establishment because Fred mania seems to draw more attention then Ron Paul does. Fred reminds me of Obama in the sense that he sings the right tune to his audience but there is very little substance behind the stage curtain.
Note this is still my initial thoughts I don't want to pass final judgement on Fred but I sure aren't going to take his candidacy seriously until enters the race officially.