Wolfowitz - 9-11, his "Pearl Harbor"

John Ashcroft - Patriot Acts

CIA - Billions of dollars extra
keys to the church committee
Constitution

Rumsfeld, Bechtel, DoD - $$ & Contracts

Cheney/Halliburton - Reconstruction contracts

Bush - Respect, a mandate

Brzezinski, author of "Grand Chessboard" - the USA's new enemy, Al Qaida, the master of terror's wet dream

[Edited on 19-09-2003 by EastCoastKid]

microchip implants companies

WEll I think the illumanti benefited the most

Since 9-11, the Constitution of the United States has faced more of a threat than ever before in American history.

It's almost become a tragic comedy?

Citizens: "Why can't you release details of 9-11?"
Dubya: "National Security reasons"

Citizens: "Why can't we read the blacked out 18 pages on the first 9-11 report that deal with Saudi Arabia?"
Dubya: "National Security issues"

Citizens: "How come we can now be investigated by the FBI without need for a warrant? Why are we able to be wiretapped based solely on "suspicions"?"
Dubya: "National Security issues"

C: "Why does Halliburton get all the sweet rebuilding contracts in Iraq"
D: "Um, National Security prevents me from telling you"


I always used to think that Americans were among the toughest, willful people in the world, but most of them seem to be ignoring the fact that their Administration has done more damage to their country than 9-11 did.

jakomo

Jak - have you noticed how racist this whole "war on terrorism" thing is? It's so Hitlerian. Tap into people's prejudices and incite the hell out of them. It's so old. You'd think people would have figured it out long ago. It makes me sick.
I waited and waited after 9-11 to see a shred of proof before we went bombing the hell out of someone. Did it ever come? The only proof is that which points straight back to the White House and Pentagon.

The real kicker that lets you know that 9/11 was either LIHOP or MIHOP (let it happen on purpose or made it happen on purpose) is the fact that NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON HAS BEEN PUNISHED FOR THE LARGEST SECURITY FAILURE IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

As a matter of fact, many were promoted and their budgets increased. Go figure.

Originally posted by Herder
The real kicker that lets you know that 9/11 was either LIHOP or MIHOP (let it happen on purpose or made it happen on purpose) is the fact that NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON HAS BEEN PUNISHED FOR THE LARGEST SECURITY FAILURE IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

As a matter of fact, many were promoted and their budgets increased. Go figure.

Excellent point, Herder. Gen. Myers was in charge of NORAD that day. NORAD stood down. How could that have been? He should've been court-martialed for the failure, in my opinion; however, he was immediately promoted to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Then there was the FBI guy in Washington who screwed up Agent Colleen Rowlie's FISA warrent (Zaccarias Moussauoi) - effectively blocking her investigation of him. He too, was promoted and disappeared from all view. PROMOTED! His ass should have been in the frying pan!!! This stinks as bad as a rotting corpse roasting in the desert sun.

cdi ---- the salvage company who helped clean up the towers and sold the scrap metal, hmm thats the same company who cleaned up okc.

Originally posted by Herder
NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON HAS BEEN PUNISHED FOR THE LARGEST SECURITY FAILURE IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

There is a term we liken to use, it is called "SCANDEL".
In "political" context, it means getting away with murder, literally.


When will the "Law Enforcers" do something about it, probably never. Everyone knows they are in deep pockets.

Originally posted by razorbackhater
cdi ---- the salvage company who helped clean up the towers and sold the scrap metal, hmm thats the same company who cleaned up okc.

And this is a co-incidence? I think not.

Would be interesting to find who the directors are ?????

I think the no-bid contracts that Halliburton (sp?) is the biggest clue to someone getting paid off for the whole thing. Although they were for Iraq, but still.

I know this is a little off topic, but, that's a cute avatar, Bowser!

During the Marijuana Tax act hearings in 1937, the representative of the American Medical Association, Doctor William C. Woodward, complained that a new federal law concerning marijuana was not necessary.

In his statement he implies that the feds were trying to buy states rights. He said the trouble the states were having in enforcing the few instances of illegal drug use of the hemp plant came about because the FEDS WOULD NOT ASSIST THE STATES when they were called upon to do so. The feds wanted more power.

The Same thing happened on September 11, 2003. The FEDS would not defend us because they want more power.

Thanks EastCoastKid,

That's my dad's cat. He's so stupid he let us my dad's glasses on him so we took pictures. We call that cat Mr. Poose

Hi, I just joined today, 1/22/05. I have had my suspicions about the truth behind 9/11 since about 5 minutes after the second plane hit the World Trade Center. Lets see.... Who had a personal motive?

Is it possible that Bush was already planning on attacking Iraq before he ever took office in 2001? If so, he needed to get the American people pretty fired up mad at the Arabs. You know that he doesn't seem to have much of a problem ordering executions. He got his start as Governor of Texas. He never stayed one execution.

So, what could be more perfect. Bush, family & inner circle orchestrate "mastermind" in their words this supposed terrorist attack on the Twin Towers, killing some 2500 or more innocent people, which probably didn't really bother him much. That sets off a chain of events, all parts of a plan to make the Bush Family Dynasty even more rich and powerful, etc...

So of course, it is immediately leaked to the media that the "hijackers" were of Middle Eastern descent. Most people believe the media. Especially grieving people, who want to grasp at any straw that makes some sort of sense.

Bush is conveniently in Texas, reading to young school children at the time of the attacks. He had probably rehearsed this moment for a long time. So, now he swiftly responds, gets things somewhat under control, reasures the nation that we will take care of those terrorists, it will never happen again, etc..etc... Of course, he has had a personal vendetta against Saddaam Hussein for quite some time, as has the rest of his family.

So, now that he looks like a hero to most of the sheep in this country, has them all believing that the terrorists were Middle Eastern, causing America to become indignant, and want to "get" those who have taken the lives of their loved ones.

So, it wasn't to far of a leap to convince them that Iraq had WMD, the country who was dictated by Saddam Hussein, who he could then have taken out by the U.S. military. Then, pretty much as the plan must have gone, once Saddaam was out of power, and the contract hits he put out on his sons was carried out, he would be free to own Iraq, one of the largest oil producing nations. He didn't do so well in the Texas oil business, but, this.....he could kill a lot of birds with one stone.

What he probably didn't take into consideration though, was the number of "insurgents" who were attacking Americans and Iraqis who cooperate with the U.S. Although, if anyone were to look up the word "insurgent", it means basically a person or persons who rebelled against the countries government and laws. Well, doesn't that make the real insurgents the United States? The ones who invaded another country, who never was a threat to the United States, just because Bush wanted the power, the oil, the revenge and the recognition.

At this point, due to his doings in his first term, all or nearly all of the conditions necessary to set FEMA in motion, with one stroke of his pen are in place. There is civil unrest; there is trouble over the continued U.S. occupation in a foreign country; the domestic economy is vey poor, and there are supposed terrorist attacks.

Just when will FEMA take over? When it does, there is no stopping it. We, as citizens will have no rights, no power, no control over our own lives. What will become of us then?