It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by infinite
not only is Labour forcing us what to wear in public, who to talk to, what to watch, etc but is now telling us where to send our Children to school.
This lastest attack is about forcing Faith schools to take on students who are not from that faith, which i really dont understand why a Muslim would send their child to a Catholic school (according to Labour, families want this)
This is another great cock up by Labour.
( i would not be suprised if Labour suddenly ban religion, expect for a "Church of Labour" )
(also, the Catholic schools are very against this plan (plus they were not orignally included) and one of the Catholic schools was the one where Blair's children went to)
....Funny that.
They are invariably enormously over-subscribed; the issue is not about 'forcing' parents to send their child there but to give parents who wish to send their child to a good school (as many of the faith based schools are) the chance to do so.
or is the 'self-interest' angle only ever applied when it's possible to spin a Labour angle?
Originally posted by infinite
Skynews reporter, Adam whats his face, mentioned the Roman Catholic schools have refused the Government ideas and Blair refused to force the issue on them.
Plus, the Archbishop of Canterbury today has also gone public with his concerns that the Government is playing a dangerous game with religion in trying to create a secular society.
But then you get Atheist groups pointing the finger and accusing Faith schools of trying to brainwash students, who are not of that faith.
even you know there has been many questions asked about Blair and Catholicism.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Whatever he was to do questions would always be asked.....and what?
At least he used the state system, unlike the vast majority of your tory pals.
Originally posted by infinite
in theory, a Catholic cannot be Prime Minister (but thats if the rumour of him being a Catholic is true)
Wasn't Blair's Univeristy called the Eton of the North?
Originally posted by infinite
Church and State should never be seperate.
When its been tried, it gets messy. Take America, its in their Constitution, but when its enforced certain religious groups complain against it.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Originally posted by djohnsto77
they'd say this just means we can't have an official "Church of the United States" and everyone has the right to worship as they please. Unfortunately in modern times it's been twisted into meaning far more than it was meant to.
Originally posted by infinite
was that done to be seen as an anti-Church of England after the War of Independence?
Originally posted by infinite
Church and State should never be seperate.
When its been tried, it gets messy.
Take America, its in their Constitution, but when its enforced certain religious groups complain against it.
France is another example
plus, our Church is apart of our proud history and i cannot see it being taken away without an outcry.
Originally posted by infinite
Baker accuses Catholics of faith-school 'lies'
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
education.independent.co.uk...
It's interesting to note the power of the Catholic lobby in the United Kingdom.
I think it would be foolish of anyone to imagine religious groups have no power at all but I don't see the RC "lobby" as particularly powerful in Britain today.