It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
How about you not jumping in without understanding the entire context of the discussion, eh?
I'm not going to defend myself to you, niteboy. You conveniently overlook anything they said. and try to judge me.
Yeah, well I find it offensive that you mangle my username and pretend some type of familiarity that isn't there.
Spoken like a true adolescent.
Who said anything about free speech zones here, niteboy?
And "rule of law"? You don't know what that is. You condone mob rule, chasing a man down an escalator so that he has to hide.
Uh, that doesn't mean that mob rule should be allowed merely because you disagree with someone.
You're so damned anti-administration that you don't even understand what the debate is about.
It's not about politics. It's not about party. It's about the actions of a mob that chases a visitor to a city so that he has to seek shelter.
That's not the way we do things. That's the very last resort. Even then it is only justified if your cause is just.
To condone chasing a man down the street is the mark of a mouth-breathing cretin. To find it amusing is the mark of an adolescent.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Yeah, they just happen to be Republican.
Kumbaya.
Originally posted by intrepid
You ignoring me jsobecky? Answer my question so we can either get it on or let the topic continue.
Originally posted by niteboy82
Oh, I'm sorry, I put something extra into the fray, and you caught me on it. Where are people supposed to protest, Becky? It's obvious that you have a problem with them being out of containment.
Originally posted by niteboy82
Give up the crystal ball, your readings are off. I read every posting.
Can you see past partisanship to do the same?
You called me niteboy, but I'm not running around and screaming like a loon because someone wants to shorten something up. That's a cheap shot, and get's no credence from me whatsoever.
Who said anything about free speech zones here, niteboy?
Where are people supposed to protest, Becky? It's obvious that you have a problem with them being out of containment.
There are a few people in New Orleans that can replace the bulb. u2u me if you need a few numbers.
Uh, that doesn't mean that mob rule should be allowed merely because you disagree with someone.
It wasn't mob rule! Stop dramaticizing this. It was exactly what it was. Mob rule. Puhlleease!
You're so damned anti-administration that you don't even understand what the debate is about.
Dear, this has nothing to do with the administration, unless you're speaking on a state level.
It's not about politics. It's not about party. It's about the actions of a mob that chases a visitor to a city so that he has to seek shelter.
My drama teacher in high school was not nearly this good. I'll have to get her to sign up and learn.
That's not the way we do things. That's the very last resort. Even then it is only justified if your cause is just.
The way you do things. Not the way we do things.
Don't put words in my posts, because I can spot that from a mile away. You won't throw my words around to fit what suits your argumentative tastes.
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Man, I would hide in a closet, if I were ganged up on.
Is there a closet in this thread?
Fighting over semantics..geez..
The guy was ushered into a closet as a precaution.
I had asked earlier about a governor that is also the Brother of a sitting president.
Would he have more security than the average governor?
Anyone know?
Originally posted by spacedoubt
I doubt that if would have to be nepotism..
I mean, regular non-politician family members have security.
Being a Governor, and a family member would make one a double target, wouldn't it?
Wouldn't security be more paranoid, and cautious with such a person?
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
You mindless fanatics always try and make everything a left vs. right.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Maybe you can point out where it is specifically protected in our Constitution?
Originally posted by jsobecky
What is not to understand? The fact that you accept violence as a method of protest, and see it as normal behavior.
Originally posted by jsobecky
The fact is, if you disagree with a politician's actions, there are methods specified to deal with it. Like elections, for example.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Adults live under the rule of law. Adolescents haven't yet grasped that, and live on the sour milk of unbridled emotion. That's what happened in Pittsburgh - a group of emotionally adolescent thugs chased a visitor to their city down into the subway.
Originally posted by jsobecky
That's not the way we do things. That's the very last resort. Even then it is only justified if your cause is just.
Originally posted by jsobecky
You are an adolescent, niteboy82. Still with the mangling of the username.
Grow up.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by forestlady
Ya know, this halppened in Pennsylvania, the home of the Quakers, a people who believe in complete non-violence. More than likely, at least a good portion of the protesters were Quaker, since it was an anti-war protest as well.
This shows how very little you know about the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and about Quakers.
You mean, like the stuff you just said about the Bush family? Oh, I forgot, it's OK if you do it, right.
So I don't know anything about the Pennsylvania and the Quakers?? ha, ha, ha. My husband lived the first 35 years of his life in Pennsylvania and is very familiar with Quakers and Amish and their commitment to non-violence. Of course, there's always a few bad apples, but the Quakers often attend protests, I know, I've been there, along with Catholic priests and nuns, Jewish rabbis and Protestant priests and church members. What's so hard to understand? And perhaps you, the expert, will tell me where I'm wrong?? You don't even make any statements to the contrary, let alone support them with fact.
As to my comments about the Bushes, I say only what is the truth. I have read at least 6 different books about the entire Bush family, not to mention scores and scores of articles by reputable journalists. Everything I say can be backed up with solid sources. You will notice, however, that I leave the hate spewing for others, I try to just report the facts. I do not make blanket statements about people, especially when I don't know them.
THe truth is, it's about time some group of people cornered a politician and asked him to be accountable. This country is a mess and it didn't get their solely by the Repub or Demo parties, it took both of them and alot of corrupt politicians. We have no system of checks and balances any more. We, the People, are on our own, it's up to us to take back our government so it can be honest and FOR the People once more. I applaud the actions of these 30 people for not standing down like cowards. Our govt SHOULD be afraid of the People, not the other way around, which is how it stands now. Jethro Bush should be afraid, he's a crook, a liar, a thief, a criminal and worst of all, a traitor - he knowingly helped to steal the 2000 election. He deserves far worse than running to hide in a closet.
Originally posted by niteboy82
Thanks for your time though Becky, even I can appreciate a healthy debate with someone that I don't agree with. You apparently cannot, and I feel terribly sorry for you. I hope eventually you learn a more peaceful approach to dealing with others, because you haven't seemed to be able to do it with me.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by niteboy82
Thanks for your time though Becky, even I can appreciate a healthy debate with someone that I don't agree with. You apparently cannot, and I feel terribly sorry for you. I hope eventually you learn a more peaceful approach to dealing with others, because you haven't seemed to be able to do it with me.
Emphasis added.
When you learn basic respect for a person, you will be able to debate with me. Until then, your actions are those of an adolescent. What you are doing is continuing to taunt me.
Why is that, niteboy82?
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by intrepid
You ignoring me jsobecky? Answer my question so we can either get it on or let the topic continue.
Excuse me? "Answer my question"? Who the hell are you to demand from me?
I'll answer you if I choose to and when I choose to.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Originally posted by niteboy82
Thanks for your time though Becky, even I can appreciate a healthy debate with someone that I don't agree with. You apparently cannot, and I feel terribly sorry for you. I hope eventually you learn a more peaceful approach to dealing with others, because you haven't seemed to be able to do it with me.
Emphasis added.
When you learn basic respect for a person, you will be able to debate with me. Until then, your actions are those of an adolescent. What you are doing is continuing to taunt me.
Why is that, niteboy82?