It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is not the purpose of karma to "instruct" and guide us towards perfection?
Is not the goal to reach a state or place where you no longer re-incarnate?
NO.
The goal is to repent and to seek out a Godly nature rather than a selfish human nature. God has infinite patience and wills NOT that even one be lost.
Originally posted by queenannie38
Which one? I read the thread, but it didn't catch my eye, I'm sorry - but point it out and I'll answer.
Originally posted by annestacey
Originally posted by UnrealZA
May I ask where you get the notion we have "free will" ??
"free will" is the ability to make our own choices in life. Every day you make decisions on how to respond to things that happen around you. You may make bad choices, and hopefully you learn from them, but you still have the free will to make the wrong decision instead of the right one.
Originally posted by Diseria
Originally posted by UnrealZA
Karma/reincarnation is self-defeating.
No, it's Self realizing. (note the 'S'.. the Self that is beyond the ego of this realm)
In order for all people to "add understanding and perspective" to their soul then they would know, grasp and understand what it is to be Chinese, Mexican, Muslim, etc. yet the evidence we have simply contradicts that. Wars rage on, ethnic violence is increasing and the middle East wants Israel totally wiped out.
If karma is to work then I would have a memory of my past life so I can continue to better myself and others, thus reaching perfection and an end to "my cycle".
I would suggest you read the 'Baghavad Gita' before deciding one way or the other.. (At least investigate it so as to make an informed decision..)
"Just as a fire is covered by smoke and a mirror is obscured by dust, just as the embryo rests deep within the womb, knowledge is hidden by selfish desire -- hidden ... by this unquenchable fire for self-satisfaction, the inveterate enemy of the wise." (3:38-39)
You don't just wake up on day with the knowledge... you have to work towards it. "He who shirks action does not attain freedom; no one can gain perfection by abstaining from work" (3:4). The process of enlightenment would be pointless if every twit and twurp got it from birth with absolutely no effort...
Karma, the 'Baghavad Gita', the entire structure requires you to stop thinking only for yourself, and thinking about others -- which, in today's world, is possible (anything's possible), but not plausible outside of individual people's behavior. "Selfish action imprisons the world. Act selflessly, without any thought of personal profit" (3:9).
I've read the 'Baghavad Gita' several times for several different papers.. the 'evidence' is nothing but delusion, and our true Selves are still hidden behind that smokescreen. We can thank the gunas for that.
"Just as a fire is covered by smoke and a mirror is obscured by dust, just as the embryo rests deep within the womb, knowledge is hidden by selfish desire -- hidden ... by this unquenchable fire for self-satisfaction, the inveterate enemy of the wise." (3:38-39)
Originally posted by UnrealZA
Thank you for this well written reply. The qoute you replied from was not one geared towards the Hindu perspective of reincarnation but rather directly towards Queenannie's reply.
I shall though attempt a response to yours. You would then argue that the Hindu goal is to rid oneself of "desire" or perhaps "selfish desire", so that one can attain "knowledge" Am I understanding that correctly?
I'm afraid we might get locked or booted for having a conversation about the meaning of written material because it is the Bible we are talking about. (Wow - isn't that just the craziest and saddest thing you ever heard? And here in America even!)
Elias was telling everyone about what was to come, what was going to happen. They didn't believed him, they didn't believe he was a prophit - not till after he was gone that is. And just like with Elias, when Jesus came people didn't believe him, didn't beleive who he was... not until after the fact, after he was crusified.
The bible does not say that reincarnation happened. Moses, Elias, Jesus --- all different people. And Jesus is the prophesised messiah. Elias prophesised about him.
Originally posted by AngelaLadyS
I've never hear of the 'Baghavad Gita' before. What is that exactly? (I'm not well learned in areas of the old scripts and such. I find them VERY interesting... but it's so hard to find the history of who wrote them, what was going on at the time, why they were written and for what reason...)
Even while ancient India was making break-throughs in the natural sciences and mathematics, the sages of the Upanishads were turning inward to analyze the data that nature presents to the mind... ... These ancient sages were actually exploring the mind. In profound meditation, they found that when consciousness is so acutely focused that it is utterly withdrawn from the body and mind it enters a kind of singularity in which the sense of a separate ego disappears. In this state, the supreme climax of meditation, the seers discovered a core of consciousness beyond time and change. They called it simply Atman, the Self. (Easwaran xxii-iii)
Originally posted by AngelaLadyS
Diseria,
I have questions... (waving hand in the air :-)
What's the difference between the Bible Jesus and the historical Jesus? I mean, I know they have to be the same person - but I've never heard of Jesus in another context besides the Bible. Have you? And if so, how?
Everybody has had enough, but no one wants to get out there and do anything about it. I'm SO close to holding som kind of rally/meeting to get people off their butts... but the problem is this. Will I get bailed out of jail? What will the bond be? And is there anything that I CAN say that won't be considered discrimination or against some 1/2 baked-commy-ACLU-anti-american law? I am nothing but an American. I'm worth nothing but a paycheck to the government or any other country. I no longer have rights... I'm a slave to all the rest of the disrespectful and ungreatful world. (Wow, that might be going a bit far... but while I was on my spiel it sounded pretty good :-)
Originally posted by etshrtslr"Prompted by her mother, she said, "Give me here on a platter the head of John the Baptist." The king was distressed, but because of his oaths and his dinner guests, he ordered that her request be granted and had John beheaded in the prison." (Matt. 14:6-10)
It seems John the Baptist had some karmic issues to deal with where could they have come from?
Again it does not explicitly say reincarnation but its either that or resurrection.....and other than Jesus resurrection its just not possible for a decomposed corpse to come back to life......even if God made it come back to life it would still need new organs new flesh new bones...that sounds more like reincarnation....common sense and passages in the bible make reincarnation the likely cause.
quoted from 'Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography' by John Dominic Crossan, pgs. 94-95
...symbolism is always latent in the bodily miracle and that bodily miracle always has social signification. ...I understand, therefore, the story of Lazarus as process incarnated in event and
not the reverse.
(John 11:21-27) Martha said to Jesus, 'Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died. And even now I know that whatever you ask from God, God will give you.' Jesus said to her, 'Your brother will rise again.' Martha said to him, 'I know that he will rise again in the resurrection at the last day.' Jesus said to her, 'I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and whoever lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?' She said to him, 'Yes, Lord; I believe that you are the Christ, the Son of God, he who is coming into the world.
For John's gospel, the process of general resurrection is incarnated in the even of Lazarus's resuscitation. That is one such movement from process [an event affecting a society/body of people] to event [an actual and historical healing of an afflicted individual at a moment in time].
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
Diseria,
That was a remarkable breakdown of the basic concepts of Karma according to the Ghita. I made a point earler in the thread about the connections between the Jivatman and Paramatman. Jiv being the temporary soul that occupies the physical body during life, and Paramatman being the soul which the Jivatman joins after death. The Paramatman is also eternal, and holds all of the memories of every Jiv that has lived. It is, in essence, God.
finding the memories of a Jivatman that has already joined with the Paramatman would be like puring a cup of water into the ocean, and pulling out that same cup of water, molicule for molicule.
I believe that hypnotic regression into past lives are often planted in the subconcious by either the hypnotist himself, or some other form of media (books TV etc.)
Originally posted by Diseria
I shall though attempt a response to yours. You would then argue that the Hindu goal is to rid oneself of "desire" or perhaps "selfish desire", so that one can attain "knowledge" Am I understanding that correctly?
Indeed, you are correct. (And from here, the discussion goes on a tangent.. I shall explain a little further, and truly I could bathe the thread in quotes and 'as-best-as-I-understand-it' explanations about this or that. However, I'll keep it as brief as possible.)
According to the 'Baghavad Gita' the desires that we suffer are of this realm (the physical), and thus do not affect the Self -- the Self learns nothing from this 'life experience', if you will. It remains the same all the time, in every person. "The senses have been conditioned by attraction to the pleasant and aversion to the unpleasant. Do not be ruled by them; they are obstacles in your path" (3:34). ((Prakriti, as defined by the glossary in this particular translation, is defined as 'the basic energy from which the mental and physical worlds take shape; nature'.)) So to depend on the sense-objects in this realm, in any way shape or form, is to depend on something that no true meaning and will, ultimately, be destroyed. (The Hindus believe that the world is of a cyclic nature -- everything material/physical will be destroyed, then 're-born'.)
Because we have bodies, we are deluged by sense-objects. While they are necessary because of the form we inhabit, we cannot ignore them (we gotta take care of our bodies). However, they do not lead to real happiness -- which is no more suffering in the physical realm. (The saying 'Life is pain' can best be applied to this idea. Our mother's suffered pain to bring us into the world, and pain is felt when we leave (by others mourning).)
Thus, the best way to live (according to the 'Baghavad Gita') is to detach ourselves from all sense-objects, and moreso selfish-attachments to actions and their rewards. (
Originally posted by UnrealZA
Thank you again for the reply, Diseria. I apologize for the late reply. I'm not always able to reply quickly because of my work.
So, in a nutshell, the Hindu is to rid oneself of selfish desire so to reach their goal. Do they then not "desire" to reach perfection and if so please explain how one can do away with selfish desire while desiring to do so?
One cannot cease to desire if their desire is to be free from desire.....it's contradictory and self-refuting. I cannot reason that out logically, can you?