It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shar
Today, leaders from more than 100 countries who dosnt exactly like America is having a meeting in Cuba. However, this should be talked about on our news and their not exactly doing that. 2 Days after the 5th anniversary of Sept. 11 they are having a meeting 90 miles from us. Wonder whats up? Sounds scary to me. Iran, North Korea, etc... are there.
news.yahoo.com...
HAVANA (AFP) - Cuba let loose a blistering indictment of US foreign policy as top diplomats from more than 100 developing countries at the Non-Aligned Summit hammered out policy stands to counter US might.
[edit on 13-9-2006 by Shar]
Originally posted by Shar
Today, leaders from more than 100 countries who dosnt exactly like America is having a meeting in Cuba. [...]
U.S report on Irans Nuke program mis-leading - U.N Nuclear Watchdog.
The IAEA and the US clashed over intelligence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction in the lead-up to the war in Iraq in March 2003.
posted by St Udio
None of the 'non-aligned nations' are building anything like an Alternative UN body . . the existing UN is too Institutionalized and being a member grants the global community of nations access to WHO (health org), World Bank loans, and access to other resources . . which any future AUN - alternate UN - would have to build up from scratch. A pretty huge task!
Bush43's administration is trying to divorce the unrest witnessed by the growth of non-aligned nations, OIC, and others, from the catch-all slogan "Clash of Civilizations" . . those suppressed nations (the 100+ ) are fed up with US dominance thru the UN, NATO, NAFTA, etc. The Clash of Civilizations is not just 'islamo-fascists' militant Muslims - terrorists - as the Bush43 administration propaganda would have us believe. . the rest of the world is waking up . . and will shake up & change the present system. [Edited by Don W]
If you've read this far, the other point in your thread starter was about news it's content isn't up to par in your way of thinking . . I’m getting a negative notion which would amount to something like central control of the news that’s meant for the population to consume. The Soviets had state run news, Pravda and Izvestia.
it seems to me that fluff news & reporting should be censored out of our communications. Only significant & worthwhile items should be force fed to the people even if they don't care about it. ~~slippery slope~~ IMHO [Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by donwhite
Aside. Have you noticed that all the good tv shows now seen on PBS are actually BBC but have the PBS label added? If it was not for BBC, the GOP would have achieved its post-Nixon goal, to kill public broadcasting.
[edit on 9/14/2006 by donwhite]
Originally posted by SmallMindsBigIdeas
I did a little research on the Non-Aligned Movement Summit. It seems the group was formed in 1979 mainly at the direction of Cuba.
Originally posted by Duby78
Originally posted by SmallMindsBigIdeas
I did a little research on the Non-Aligned Movement Summit. It seems the group was formed in 1979 mainly at the direction of Cuba.
I agree with you in most points, however, I have to correct you a little. Non aligned movement was founded in 1961. Founders of NAM were Tito (Yugoslavia), Sukarno (Indonesia), Nasser (Egypt), Nkrumah (Ghana) and Nehru (India), and foundining conference took place in Belgrade in 1961. So, it's not formed mainly at the direction of Cuba, as you stated. If someone wants more details about NAM's background, here they are. The Non-Aligned Movement: Description and History
I agree with the rest of your post.
It's nothing new, and nothing really important. Most of these countries cannot be called 'enemies of US'. This is not anti-US coallition, so US enemies AREN'T developing their own United Nations.
Originally posted by St Udio
Originally posted by Shar
Today, leaders from more than 100 countries who dosnt exactly like America is having a meeting in Cuba. [...]
..................................................................................................................
If you've read this far,
the other point in your thread starter was about news,
it's content isn't up to par in your way of thinking...
i'm getting a negative notion about what your suggesting,
which would ammount to something like central control of the news
thats meant for the population to consume.
The Soviets had central planning, & state run news, & Pravda.
it seems to me that your suggesting that fluff news & reporting
should be censored out of our communications.
Only significant & worthwhile items should be force fed to the people
even if they don't care about it.
~~slippery slope~~ imho
Originally posted by Techsnow
Well Fox News didn't mention much and CNN talked more about wether or not Fidel would be there. Yahoo says the most by far. But this isn't important who is covering the most. LAES YVAN is right, the common American doen't care and they shouldn't care... It's nice of CNN and Foxnews to protect the people of America from this news because otherwise people would get scared, so we should really be thanking them.
[edit on 14-9-2006 by Techsnow]
Originally posted by Shar
No, I totally disagree on thanking the news on their so called protect. Its our right to know. Thats their job to tell us....If people are so sheltered that they cant handle life around them and whats going on in our world theres a huge problem there. Some of us are not babies and do not care for the milk. Some of us wants to hear what they are suppose to tell us and do not.
PARIS - Al-Qaida has for the first time announced a union with an Algerian insurgent group that has designated France as an enemy, saying they will act together against French and American interests
Originally posted by wondernut
Originally posted by Shar
instead of trying to negotiate with 1 country at a time we could talk with all of them
also it would cause the world to effectively be divided into 2 groups, the UN and the unUN (ununited nations' United Nations)
Yes, but has anyone here in America ever thought that maybe the powers to be is intensionally dividing the countries into two groups. The same way we are done here with republicans and democrats. Its easy to see these two groups have divided people here in America so much that everyone fights against everyone else and stays away from the real issues.
Originally posted by Shar
news.yahoo.com...
More evidence of countries coming together. Its a very good read.