It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sorry for only answering now, but I only saw your post when I was going to turn off the computer and it was to late for me to answer at that time.
Originally posted by sherpa
Could you tell me what you think this is on the horizon.
I don't think that is the atmosphere, that "haze" appears only on the right side of the image (or in the left side, on the photo you posted), and is stronger in the places where the image is darker.
Originally posted by zorgon
That is amazing Sherpa it even shows the haze of the atmosphere.
Originally posted by sherpa
The reference dots that cover the image, when are they originated ?
"The lunar surface Hasselblad cameras were fitted with a device called a reseau plate. The reseau plate is a clear glass plate on which is etched small black cross hairs, called "fiducials" by some and "reticles" by others. As each film frame is drawn into place, it is pressed against the reseau plate so that the picture is taken through the plate. This results in an image of the fiducials being superimposed over the image focused through the lens.
Originally posted by ArMaP
I don't think that is the atmosphere, that "haze" appears only on the right side of the image (or in the left side, on the photo you posted), and is stronger in the places where the image is darker.
Originally posted by ArMaP
I think that is a synthetic fiber that was on the scanner or on the photo strips, it looks exactly like one, especially the fact that it has a constant width and is translucent.
Originally posted by whatsthatthingy
Would help if we knew the exposure time and the picture was in color.
Originally posted by sherpa
However the reticules, (I am beginning to dislike that word), are still visible in two places on the anomaly.
Is the brighter area that is supposed to be the atmosphere?
Originally posted by zorgon
Well it would be stronger where the sun goes down, but pray tell then ArMaP what IS causing the glow if not the atmosphere? Considering its brighter near the limb than fades out?
Source
The film was bimat processed on board, optically scanned, and the resulting video signal telemetered to ground stations. Film density readout was accomplished by a high-intensity light beam focused to a 6.5-micron-diameter spot on the spacecraft film. The flying spot scanner swept 2.67 mm in the long dimension of the spacecraft film. This process was repeated 286 times for each millimeter of film scanned. The raster signal received at the ground station was recorded on magnetic tape and also fed to ground reconstruction equipment (GRE), which reproduced the portion of the image contained in one raster on a 35-mm film positive framelet. Over 26 framelets are required for a complete MR photograph and 86 for a complete HR image. Of the 211 simultaneous exposures, the performance was nominal until the final readout on March 2, 1967. A detailed description of the experiment, a bibliography, and indexes of all the available Lunar Orbiter 1 through 5 photos are contained in the report 'Lunar Orbiter photographic data,' NSSDC 69-05, June 1969.
Originally posted by sherpa
Actually I can't remember if I flipped or rotated the original because I had no reference to tell me whether the image was the right way round all I knew was I wanted the horizon to be up.
Zorgon may have done a better job.
Originally posted by FreeThinkerIdealist
Is it atmosphere, or a thin haze ... like fog?