It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by internos
I have some questions for John Lear:
John, i've noticed this "tower-shaped" object near Neper crater:
Since i think to have seen something similar before somewhere else (on the Moon) my questions are:
- Do you remember to have seen something similar elsewhere?
- Do you know what is it an what should be its height?
Of course i'm wrong, but i find really odd that a so shaped object could resist to the impact of a crater...
Thank you in advance
[edit on 4/10/2007 by internos]
Originally posted by whatsthatthingy
Is it just me that get a Page 219, but the thread stops at Page 218?
I don't know how those fiducial marks were made, I am still searching for it and not founding anything about it, but being white marks they could not have been made by a sheet of glass in front of the camera (unless that was made with a two-pass photo, one positive and the other negative), they were probably made by flashing a little light on the negative, that is the best way of getting a white spot on a photo, and apparently that is one of the ways of making fiducial marks.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by sherpaThe reference dots that cover the image, when are they originated ?
The technical term is a FIDUCIAL MARK .They are etched onto a sheet of glass , known as a RESEAU PLATE.
Originally posted by internos
reply to post by whatsthatthingy
Hope you don't mind, but if someone asks something to someone ELSE than you, probably this "someone" hopes in a better answer than the one you are able to provide, and since you weren't able to find the source of the pic, you AREN'T able to answer to my question.
After said that, next time maybe we'll meet on a grammar-based forum, so you'll feel free to correct me as many times as you want, since english is not my mother tongue language. (BTW: how many languages do you know? you can show it to me in the chat.)
www.lpi.usra.edu...
www.lpi.usra.edu...
So, don't mind, anomalies are called so till someone ABLE to, can explain them. (Someone did it BETTER than you via u2u and this case was already CLOSED, for me): i leaved my previous post just in order to be correct.
[edit on 4/10/2007 by internos]
Originally posted by ArMaPI don't know how those fiducial marks were made, I am still searching for it and not founding anything about it, but being white marks they could not have been made by a sheet of glass in front of the camera
The film is held precisely in place by pressure against a movable glass stage plate that contains reseau marks. Fiducial marks are flashed on the film marking the optical axis at midexposure time. Simultaneously, the time of exposure, to the nearest millisecond, according to the spacecraft clock is recorded on the data block on each frame.
Originally posted by whatsthatthingy
Didn't mean ANY disrespect AT ALL in the previous post. Apologies if you found it offensive to you, but I fail to see where it ever was in any way offensive. And BTW English is not my first language either. Third language... If you post on a public forum, is it not assumed that someone else is going to give it a shot? Is it not the purpose that everybody gives it a shot?
And don't forget that the negatives are MOON DUST now... they never came back to Earth... ( I would love to find those film cans up there )
Originally posted by Soloistaccepted fact of physics.
Why does that happen?
Air resistance.
Because the Earth has an atmosphere (with breathable air~!) the feather and actually many other objects, for example a sheet of paper, will drag in the air and not cut through like a smoother more aerodynamic object will.
Now, the point of all this, let's take it to the moon. Since the moon has no air there should be no resistance keeping the feather from falling at the same rate as a much heavier object. If there is any air at all, a feather will never ever hit the ground at the same time as let's say a hammer, right?
Well low and behold, Commander David Scott of Apollo 15 did this exact demonstration on live TV from the surface of the moon.
Here's a web page about it :
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...
And here's a link to a youtube vid of the experiment :
www.youtube.com...
It *is* valid, no matter how much you seem to wish it not to be, you can't just discount 400 years of advanced scientific theory that has been proven. You should really read Stephen Hawking's book if you would like one of the most brilliant expert opinions on that specific experiment. I'm sure noone here is so sure that they can even approach his level of intelligence.
If there had been ANY amount of air resistance, the feather could not have possibly hit the ground the same time as the hammer. No way. No how. There is no may not be, it's very valid.
Originally posted by undo
I have a rather funny question to ask:
Are you sure those pics are taken on the earth?
# 1.6 CAPABILITIES DEVELOPED
The development of large boosters, rendezvous techniques and maneuverable space vehicles, all required for the Lunar Expedition, will also provide a capability for many new and advanced space achievements. For example, the Space Launching System which will boost 134,000 pounds to escape velocity will boost approximately 350,000 pounds into a 300 nm orbit, or will launch a manned vehicle on a pass around either Mars or Venus.
Originally posted by sherpa
I admire your enthusiasm Z but there is redundancy in this comment, if you were able to get your hands on these you wouldn't bother, just go and have a look around yourself
Originally posted by zorgon
Well thank you Professor Soloist for that lesson in basic physics
#1 Watching the film repeatedly and in frame by frame I can see the feather waiver... even in normal view this is obvious as the light reflects differently as the feather wavers on its way to the ground.
#2 Have YOU ever done this test on Earth? Drop a hammer at the same time as a feather from a height of four feet and recorded the results?
I gather with your 'preaching' "Low and behold..." that you are implying that one most have an IQ approaching Mr. Hawkins to be able to understand things.
Sure about this you are, yes? Hmmmmm? [Heavy Yoda accent here]
Well before you claim "No way. No how." I would suggest that you try it at home... you might be surprised [shocked] at the results...
Don't want to try it at home? Well that's okay because someone did it for you...
Originally posted by Soloist
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
HAHAHAHHAHAHAAA!
HHAHAHAHA!!!