Video Footage of Woman In Peaceful Protest Shot In Face By Police, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 6-9-2006 @ 12:07 AM by LAES YVAN
Originally posted by ANOK



Personally I think you're just frustrated 'cause everyone of your arguments has been shot down, so you now revert to personal insults.



Actually I'm frustrated because you are so blind and clueless, that you actually think you shot down my arguments, and continue to go on about a subject that you are totally wrong about. You are to blind to see that I shot down ALL of your arguments and any and all arguments you may have in the future by simply saying this...

...your constitutional rights to peaceably protest are void when that protest becomes violent...

It should have ended there, yet you keep going and going and going and going and going.... YOU actually out last the energizer bunny.

You fit the profile of an immature anarchist. You don't know when to realize you are wrong, and you need to have the last word. You make claims like "all my arguments have been shot down", then you continue to defend the anarchists, with nothing more than words from a web page, and ZERO proof.

This topic is about the FTAA protest - I have shown video's, photos, and documents supporting my argument that the protest was violent. There was fires, assault, destruction of property, and graffiti on walls, mainly giant A's with circles around them. Yeah that's right an Anarchy symbol. And what do you know... we have an anarchist trying to twist the peoples illegal activities around, and make the police look like the bad guys.

I truly hope you are at the next protest that gets out of control like this one.... I want to see the video of you getting a pellet in the head.. I do..

Actually I wish some day you are the owner of a business that has to fork out $2,000 to have their building professionally repainted because a protesters graffiti. Then pay another $1000 to have a new advertisement sign created and placed in the ground, since the protesters pulled it out and decided to use it as a shield.

Better yet, I hope you anarchists get your way, and the police do NOTHING about the protest, so that your whole city will break out into riots, and you wont even be able to leave your house without worrying about getting killed. Then your business goes bankrupt because everybody is afraid to go to it, and nobody wants to enter it because the windows are broken and all the merchandise is gone. Your business loan isn't fully payed off, and now you are in debt because your store front is totaled, meaning the repairs will cost more then the whole building cost when it was new.

The point is, you and your protest isn't the center of the universe. The government could care less about your stupid little protests, but as soon as the protest gets violent, that's when they care.

Grow up... If there ever is a "police state" it wont ever be in your lifetime.


reply posted on 6-9-2006 @ 11:47 AM by mf2hd
I am sorry you feel that the point I am trying to make is immature and connot be discussed, I beg to differ. I am also not an anachist, never was.
Maybe I didn't put it out clearly enough.
So here it is again:
I feel that every responsible citizen has not only the right but also duty to protest and show civil disobedience . Here's the link that explains the term:
en.wikipedia.org...

I believe that breaking certain laws, especially those that aim to supress the freedom of expression (be that state, federal or municipial regulations) is necessary to preserve the above said freedom. Otherwise you end up with a totalitarian country.

Now to address your post:




...your constitutional rights to peaceably protest are void when that protest becomes violent...


1. In political protests violence is mostly instigated by the police or provocateurs in the crowd. It's easy to provoke the crowd to violence.

2. Do you think that the violent protests against totalitarian goverments of Poland, Eastern Germany, Soviet Union were wrong and the goverments had the right to shoot people, beat them up and arrest them? As far as I remember those protests were actively supported by the USA gov. So do we have an equal measure here and abroad or not? Without those protests the world would still be divided with the iron curtain.



This topic is about the FTAA protest - I have shown video's, photos, and documents supporting my argument that the protest was violent. There was fires, assault, destruction of property, and graffiti on walls, mainly giant A's with circles around them. Yeah that's right an Anarchy symbol. And what do you know... we have an anarchist trying to twist the peoples illegal activities around, and make the police look like the bad guys.


Your point is valid as far as the topic of the discussion, I am trying to make a more general point that I still think pertains to the topic. If you think I am OT please let me know, but don't resort to name calling. I don't.

The police made themselves look bad by deliberately targetting that woman, who at best was provocative but clearly was not violent, and then cheering themselves on afterwards. I don't see them fishing out the bad guys from the crowd.
Again, not all illegal activities are bad just before they break a law. A law was made by people and can be changed by people, some laws and regulations are unlawful and going against higher values like freeedom.

I truly hope you are at the next protest that gets out of control like this one.... I want to see the video of you getting a pellet in the head.. I do..

I truly hope this is just the emotions speaking through you. I do not wish you harm. In fact I hope you stay safe although I might disagree with you.

Grow up... If there ever is a "police state" it wont ever be in your lifetime.


I don't know what makes you so sure of it. The system of checks and ballances in the USA has been suspended in favour of the executive power. I personally think that the threat of USA becoming a police state is quite high. Especially if the majority of people are not prepared to make a stand for their believes.

[edit on 6-9-2006 by mf2hd]

[edit on 6-9-2006 by mf2hd]


reply posted on 6-9-2006 @ 12:16 PM by mf2hd
I believe a good case maybe made that this is a beginning of a police state:
news.yahoo.com...

President Bush pushed a hard line Wednesday on trying terror suspects through military tribunals, exhorting Congress to allow evidence to be withheld from a defendant if necessary to protect classified information.


Remember that anyone, including all american citizens can be a "terror suspect". In my opinion this would destroy the legal culture in the USA as we know it and give unprecedented powers to the executive branch.

Even more scary in the same article:

Another potential point of conflict is whether coerced testimony should be admissible. Administration officials have said allowing coerced testimony in some cases may be necessary, but McCain said the committee bill would ban it entirely.

So the struggle for a free America is on and because of the complacency of the politicians on both sides of the political spectrum civil disobedience will be a big part of it.



[edit on 6-9-2006 by mf2hd]


reply posted on 6-9-2006 @ 05:14 PM by ANOK
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
Better yet, I hope you anarchists get your way, and the police do NOTHING about the protest, so that your whole city will break out into riots, and you wont even be able to leave your house without worrying about getting killed. Then your business goes bankrupt because everybody is afraid to go to it, and nobody wants to enter it because the windows are broken and all the merchandise is gone. Your business loan isn't fully payed off, and now you are in debt because your store front is totaled, meaning the repairs will cost more then the whole building cost when it was new. state" it wont ever be in your lifetime.


This is just paranoid ranting...What if the police and the authorities get their way?

No right to protest? No freedom of movement? If cops had their way I know my neighborhood would be a war zone.

In fact if it wasn't for us and protesters you wouldn't have any rights at all. The rights and freedoms we do have were not gained by the police or military, it was gained through regular joes standing up and saying no more, we want change.

If the police got their way it boggles the mind to think what kind of society we would live in.

What has protesting gained for us...

40hr week, the vote for women (as useless as the vote is), min/max working age, minimum wage, end of segregation, no poll tax (UK), public education, no gas price hike (Hyderabad India), 1990 Nepal won it's freedom through protests.
(there's thousand more example if you take the time to look)

You see protests are not just a bunch of 'immature Anarchists' being rebellious for the sake of it. Protests are the only way for ordinary people have a voice in the world.
Don't you think those gains were worth the inconvenience and 'violence'?
The state sure thinks it's use of violence is justified, no? State violence only creates more violence, and they have their 'law' on their side.

If it wasn't for protesters your children would have to work in sweat shops for little to nothing in pay, with no fixed hours.

And btw I have no business to go bankrupt and never will Maybe if people put more effort into changing society, instead of gaining for themselves, we wouldn't have to have protests.


reply posted on 7-9-2006 @ 09:43 AM by 11Bravo
Navy obviously doesnt understand that the establishment hates protests because sometimes it forces them to alter their plan.
Navy obviously doenst understand that people that protest usually ARE angry about the current situation, and thus the protest.
Navy obviously doenst understand that violence begats violence, so if the cops tell a peaceful protest to disperse, then try to enforce the dispersal through violence, they will often be met with violence.
Navy obviously has never witnessed gung-ho cops over stepping their authority (while following orders)

In Navys world all cops are good and just and no matter WHAT the protest the people should obey orders to disperse and quietly shuffle home.
I wish I lived in Navys world, but alas Im stuck here in reality.

I will say it again Navy,
I dont care if they were firing RUBBER BANDS at that woman, she was not the problem. The FACT that they laughed about it afterwards only proves that they werent there to protect and serve. They are pigs that should have joined the military if they enjoyed shooting at people so much, and I guess they should have joined some foreign military since they like shooting at american women so much.

Is it such a bizarre concept for the police to isolate and remove the trouble makers?
Dont they have the manpower or the tools?
They can disperse/detain crouds of thousands, but its impossible to identify and eliminate the handfull of true trouble makers?
Ah heck, just gas the entire protest, fire projectiles randomly into the croud, beat down anyone not smart or agile enough to get out of the way. Silence the whole protest because some teenager has a sling-shot.
Reminds me of the old saying '
"kill 'em ALL! Let God sort em out."

Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



I finally solved a great mystery! I think I see now...
  Posted 18 days ago with 72 member flags
Finally! MSM Coverage - Legal Challenges to Fed - The End is Near
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
You Westerners Are Deluded
  Posted 18 days ago with 30 member flags
‘Barcode everyone at birth’
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
Pentagon Source Alludes to Martial Law Around July 1st, 2012
  Posted 1 days ago with 17 member flags
FBI Seize Email server, then return it
  Posted 15 days ago with 16 member flags