It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The energies invovled just don't match up though, its like suggesting that dust falls on a gun, pushed the trigger and fired a bullet.
Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
Im hoping I can get detailed analysis by geologists or physicists.
source
Richter TNT for Seismic Example
Magnitude Energy Yield
(approximate)
2.0 1 ton Large Quarry or Mine Blast
4.0 1,000 tons Small Nuclear Weapon
4.5 5,100 tons Average Tornado (total energy)
6.0 1 million tons Double Spring Flat, NV Quake, 1994
6.5 5 million tons Northridge, CA Quake, 1994
7.0 32 million tons Largest Thermonuclear Weapon
8.0 1 billion tons San Francisco, CA Quake, 1906
9.0 32 billion tons Chilean Quake, 1960
Originally posted by ArMaP
But now that I think of it, this does nothing to show what energy was needed to trigger the earthquake, this type of energy may be much smaller than the energy used by the earthquake, like the energy needed to pull the trigger of a crossbow compared to the energy that is applied to the arrow.
It may be possible to trigger an earthquake with a relatively small amount of energy if the conditions are already there, and what is needed is only the "straw that breaks the camel's back".
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
So both earthquakes and crossbows need only a little energy to create a lot of energy? Nope!
Don't believe me? Then you've never taken a basic physics or science class - For every force there is an equal and opposite reaction.
If the conditions are already there, that means that energy is being withheld in the earth as potential energy. So it's not just a little bit of energy to create the earthquake, because all of that previously stored energy goes into the creation of the earthquake!
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Once an area has a major earthquake, it tends to have MORE major earthquakes. It releases the pressure on one area of the fault, but that pressure has to go somewhere, so it tends to move down the fault and increase the pressure in another area, and you get another quake.
Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
Are you speaking of after shocks? Or perennial Earthquakes? I do understand you if your talking about aftershocks, but There are another 800 people dead now and the media only speaks of the Tsunami this time and not the earthquake.
Originally posted by forestlady
some oil company drilled 25 MILES in the ocean into the Earth's core.
Don't know if that had anything to do with it, but it might.
but Congress passed a law making weather modification legal or some such, if I remember correctly.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Man is meaningless, man can't trigger earthquakes with nukes or drills.
NORSAR - Induced Seismicity
From oil and gas fields the problems relating to induced seismicity have been known since the 1920, and were 30 years later thoroughly studied at an oil field near Wilmington, California, where the oil production triggered a series of damaging earthquakes. In the last decade a number of examples of earthquake activity related to oil and gas production as well as injection of liquids under high pressure have been observed, although not with as serious consequences as for Wilmington.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Man is meaningless, man can't trigger earthquakes with nukes or drills.
Originally posted by Nygdan
but Congress passed a law making weather modification legal or some such, if I remember correctly.
Dropping salt into clouds will make them rain. Thats weather modification. Why would congress even need to make it 'legal', its not illegal in the first place.
EXPERIMENTAL WEATHER MODIFICATION BILL FAST TRACKING FOR PASSAGE IN U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
External Source
U.S. Senate Bill 517 and U.S. House Bill 2995, a bill that would allow experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implement a national weather modification policy, does not include agriculture or public oversight, is on the "fast track" to be passed early in 2006. ...This bill is designed to implement experimental weather modification. The appointed Board of Directors established by this bill does not include any agricultural, water, EPA, or public representatives, and has no provisions for Congressional, State, County, or public oversight of their actions or expenditures.
Weather Modification may adversely impact agricultural crops and water supplies. If the weather is changed in one state, region or county it may have severe consequences in another region, state or county. And who is going to decide the type of weather modification experimentation and who it will benefit or adversely impact?
Gil Smolin, an Avian Bird Flu expert, noted on the Ron Owens Show on KGO Radio (January 5, 2006), that the flu was spread more quickly in the winter when there was a "lack of sunlight". Would man-made clouds be contributing to the lack of sunlight which might cause the Avian Bird flu to spread more quickly at other times of the year? Experimental weather modification programs could also exacerbate this problem by changing climate patterns, increasing man-made cloud cover, and changing our weather and climate patterns.