It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aotearoa
When someone invents square birds, I'll be convinced it's a bird.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Not convinced yet?
Originally posted by Xo0
Compression can force small object to appear lager to get them in the picture.. Why am I completely ignored on this matter..?
Its funny how my object is about twice the height of his bird picture, and there is still the same amount of pixels... goes to show how big this object really is!
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
Nope not convinced because i dont know how far that object is, nor do i know how fast it is flying.. because there is nothing next to it to measure it up to. Unlike the smoke plume on my video....
Originally posted by longhaircowboy
I'd be interested in knowing the specs on lost_shamans pic to establish some perspective.
Originally posted by intrepid
LAES YVAN, look up to the right of your screen, it says that you have X# u2u's. That's private communications. Click on it please.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Then you'll likely never be convinced , because I just exactly was able to duplicate the "pixelated smudge" by taking a digital picture of a Turkey Vulture.
Originally posted by LAES YVAN
Originally posted by Xo0
Compression can force small object to appear lager to get them in the picture.. Why am I completely ignored on this matter..?
Because compression DOES NOT MAKE THINGS LARGER. You know 'compress'.
If something is as small as it can be, it will stay that way. If something is large and needs to be compressed to make the image files size smaller, that is when things tend to shrink.
[edit on 12-6-2006 by LAES YVAN]
Originally posted by Blaine91555
When you blow up any digital image too far all you can see are the actual pixels which appear as little squares. If you zoom in that far and still can not identify the object it means that the image does not contain enough information. When the image becomes pixilated (turns into little squares) that means that the limits of the information in the image file have been reached. There is no hope of ever identifying the object as the file does not contain enough information. If the original was shot with film (not with a digital camera) and you can get a copy of the film to me; I’d be glad to blow up a few frames to see what the objects are. You would have to provide a physical copy of the film to do this. A video recording of a TV broadcast is not of any use either. If this was a recording of a TV broadcast that was then converted to an even lower resolution digital copy, then there is no hope. You have already lost most of the detail during the compression process. If it was shot with and HD digital video camera and you could provide the original raw file on disc then I would have enough detail to maybe identify the objects. Otherwise this is all speculation and assumptions. I can not prove it is birds and you can not prove it is not. Otherwise it fits into the definition of insanity. Repeating the same action with the same negative results over and over again.