It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nt327
Hey Pepsi78,
You keep talking about how we can't accept facts and how we have no proof.
"If the calls were faked voices, how did they get the passenger voices? And how would they fake a live conversation? The voice morphing only works on recorded tapes. The conversations on 93 were live conversations, not recorded messages. The whole voice over theory is B.S." nt327
Why can't you answer my question?
I ask you again for the 3rd time:
How did they get the passenger voices in order to fake the calls???
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Also, some of the flight attendants used the plane phones to tell people what's going on. Those work 100% of the time....
Originally posted by pepsi78
I guess it's imposible that so many calls from the cell fones were made.
Some people still dont like to accept the facts when facts are standig in front of them.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by pepsi78
I guess it's imposible that so many calls from the cell fones were made.
Some people still dont like to accept the facts when facts are standig in front of them.
it is entirely possible to make cell phone calls from an airplane.
only idiots argue otherwise.
Originally posted by tuccy
Maybe because they wanted the calls to be easier, more reliable and without threat of interference with the avionics?
Originally posted by tuccy
It did work, though not perfectly, as you can read in several links posted before. It just wasn't encouraged as there was a fear of interference with the aircraft's systems.
I have pointed out elsewhere, cellphone calls from commercial aircraft much over 8000 feet are essentially impossible, while those below 8000 feet are highly unlikely down to about 2000, where they become merely unlikely. (Dewdney 2003) Moreover, even at the latter altitude (and below), the handoff problem appears. Any airliner at or below this altitude, flying at the normal speed of approximately 500 mph, would encounter the handoff problem (Dewdney 2003). An aircraft traveling at this speed would not be over the cellsite long enough to complete the electronic "handshake" (which takes several seconds to complete) before arriving over the next cellsite, when the call has to be handed off from the first cellsite to the next one. This also takes a few seconds, the result being, in the optimal case, a series of broken transmissions that must end, sooner or later, in failure.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Originally posted by tuccy
Maybe because they wanted the calls to be easier, more reliable and without threat of interference with the avionics?
It's because it didint work with out a com station in the plane.
Originally posted by BlueSkyes
2. they thought they were going to die so they called their familes to tell them they loved them one last time.
...thus far you seem the least educated and stupidest person in this post
thus far you seem the least educated and stupidest person in this post
.i mean i dont usualy like to insult peoples inteligence but you my freinds are plain stupid
pepsi you are an assclown..
i mean come on how stupid are you...and its Phones not fones
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by BlueSkyes
2. they thought they were going to die so they called their familes to tell them they loved them one last time.
...thus far you seem the least educated and stupidest person in this post
Number 2. I thought the passengers didn't know about WTC until they called their loved ones. Why would they be afraid to die when before 9/11 the policy of highjackings was to land somewhere until you got what you wanted. Why would they be afraid to die?
The last part of that, IMO, was uncalled for and I can't believe you haven't been warned yet.
Originally posted by Aotearoa
I read about Dewdney's experiments. If I recall correctly, they were done in a Cessna. I haven't been able to find any evidence of him trying the same experiment in a commercial aircraft. Also, I was unable to find any evidence of his credentials.
Originally posted by nt327
Have you ever been on an airplane that was hijacked?? Have you ever seen someone stabbed in front of you and then have the people in control of the plane say they have a bomb??? Maybe that's why they were scared. When they heard about the WTC and Pentagon, that's when they knew they were on a doomed flight, thats not when they became scared.
I'm sorry but that was a really stupid point.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by nt327
Have you ever been on an airplane that was hijacked?? Have you ever seen someone stabbed in front of you and then have the people in control of the plane say they have a bomb??? Maybe that's why they were scared. When they heard about the WTC and Pentagon, that's when they knew they were on a doomed flight, thats not when they became scared.
Have you ever heard of people making phone calls on a highjacked plane before?
I'm sorry but that was a really stupid point.
Right back atcha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!