It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by alienanderson
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Basically all that he proved was that coming in and out of London, Ontario in a Cessna, you have a one in a hundred chance of makeing a phone call above certain altitudes.
Really it has no bearing on 9-11 phone calls whatsoever.
This experiment may though:
Cell Phone Experiments in Airliners by Germar Rudolf July 2003
Conclusion
Burlington, VT, lies within a more rural area, whereas Chicago is the third largest city of the U.S. with one of the best developed cellular networks. In spite of this, the results were similar in both cases for the Verizon Wireless network, which prides itself on being the best developed in the U.S. The reason why the second phone failed to establish any service in the Chicago area until after landing is unknown.
Cell phones traveling in airliners can get a service signal at heights up to some 6,000 ft, but it is not possible to make a connection, at least not while traveling at the usual cruising speed of a normal airliner (500-550 mph). Since in all cases (if at all) connections could only be established well after the pilots have pulled out the landing gear at some 2,000 ft and at a cruising speed of 230 mph or less, it seems safe to conclude that in summer of 2003, no connection could be made with a cell phone from an airliner flying in the U.S. when above an altitude above ground of 2,000 ft (610 m) and when traveling with a speed over 230 mph. Considering the fast descent of the planes and the fact that they kept slowing down as they approached the runway, the height at which a connection could be established might actually be as low as 1,500 ft (457.5 m), and the speed around 200 mph.
The reason why a connection could only be established at some 1,500 ft above ground despite the fact that a signal was present already at some 6,000 ft may be that the speed of the traveling aircraft was too high at higher altitudes. It seems safe to say that the speed must be under 230 mph in order to establish a stable connection, a speed which an airliner can reach only during landing, with landing gear, air brakes and flaps all the way out.
It is generally agreed upon that all the airliners that crashed on September 11, 2001, flew at a high cruising speed of 500 mph and more until they crashed. Thus, it seems safe to say that no cell phone of any type could have established any stable connection to any cell site at that speed, no matter which height the planes flew at. This is particularly true for United Airlines flight 93, which did not only fly at high speed but also at a relatively high altitude during the time when the alleged cell phone calls were placed.
source physics911.ca
ID cards are to become mandatory in the UK, purportedly to 'prevent terrorism.'
Police in the UK are being given powers to give 'On the spot fines' for various 'offences' each at the police officers own discretion
Tony Bliar is in the process of trashing Human Rights Laws. Don't believe me?? READ THE PAPERS
You're not under constant surveillence?? So I suppose the CCTV and possibly satellites that film everywhere you walk just by-pass you?
I have been removed from various public places for participating in non-violent protests. I am being termed a 'Terrorist' and a ''Fanatic' for my Animal Rights views. That is a direct erosion of my Civil Liberties, along with forcing me to have an ID card, filming me every day, and creating new laws that force myself and my family to be bogged down into submission.
No-one is Microchipped? Why don't you do a bit of research before you post on this site. I think you will find it is happening NOW
9/11 wasn't used as a means to invade Iraq? So I suppose I dreamt all the stuff in the papers about Saddam's links with Al'Queda?
Originally posted by Vushta
No. After 911 the forces went to Afganistan. The idea of 911 being used to invade Iraq is just silly if you think about it.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by Vushta
No. After 911 the forces went to Afganistan. The idea of 911 being used to invade Iraq is just silly if you think about it.
Silly to whom? GW? I don't think so. He stated plenty of times before the war that Sadam had close affiliations with Bin Laden. How can you disregard this information as silly? Where were you before the war started? So, yes, in part 9/11 was a direct link to the Iraqi war.
Originally posted by alienanderson
This experiment may though:
Originally posted by Delta Alter
If you don't see the problem with biometric ID cards then the brainwashing is complete! It is a dangerous world we live in when when every minute detail of our personal information is recorded for outside usage.
I have no doubt that the situation over here is more grave than wherever you are. I only have to travel abroad to see the difference in lifestyles.
We have the highest concentration of CCTV in Europe. The police dole out on the spot fines for throwing litter, chewing gum,and whatever they decide is drunk and disorderley behaviour.
Tony Blair is currently putting into the motion the right for the Goverment to OVERWRITE COURT RULINGS, supposedly to protect victims of crime.
Microchipping is not a commonplace occurence in England, no - but the seeds are being sown. I read of a nightclub in Glasgow where the fashionable people are queuing up to get themselves chipped. Microchipping of children is commonplace, and even being offered for free by MASONS.
www.gl-mi.org...
Fear of Terrorism is aiding this agenda. 9/11 created the fear of terrorism.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Originally posted by alienanderson
This experiment may though:
Sorry, but one guy with two phones on a plane flight hardly counts as an experiment. Where was the control? Who did the double blind tests? None of these prove anything other than what happened in the specific circumstances tested with those specific phones.
Originally posted by tuccy
Yup, they're high and a plane rammed them, albeit a completely different plane in completely different circumstances
Look..people make cell phone calls from planes. Look..people make cell phone calls from planes.
End of story.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
I've used my cellphone when flying light aircraft, but I thought the majority of the passengers used airphones anyway? The planes descended to low altitudes in the last stages of their flights so what about if any cell phone calls were made then?