It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
I see it's time for the latest round of "ATS ain't what it used to be"...
Originally posted by dgtempe
I am a grandmother to a beautiful little girl today and her name is Sara. I am blessed in many ways!
Originally posted by Dr Love
Masons going Unabomber on some dude's toilet is no reason to have a meltdown, it's a reason to lighten up and laugh a little.
I'm sure 95% of the members here think that the story is BS anyways so I don't see a reason to take it so seriously.
Peace
Originally posted by mrsdudara
SHeesh, I cant believe people are blaming the mods for this. If someone makes a "stupid" comment, like the whole "masons made me blow up my toilet" thing, then why dont you just explain your view of how that is nonsence. That seems easy enough to me. The mods cant do anything about that. You know, the whole "freedom of speach" thing. Who is to say what is nonsence or not? Seems to me the responsibility lies with the intellegent members of this site who have the ability to respectfully debunk them and make them look foolish. Seriously, why should the mods be responsible for debating your view for you?
Originally posted by Ezekiel
I dont mind constructive criticism and I'm a huge supporter of freedom of speech -however there is a line that should not be crossed.
Originally posted by Ezekiel
Im not asking the mods to debate my point for me, however I would like to see more done to members that make VERY offensive generalisations about people such as "....all freemasons are child molestors".
Originally posted by imbalanced
I agree too. I like to read about stories that could have some sort of reality to them, but reading about " a three headed women", or "do we meet aliens when we die" is not fun. I get interested when something sounds credible and deserves a little more attention. I find myself browsing the science and aircraft section more because of this.
[edit on 9-5-2006 by imbalanced]
Originally posted by Burginthorn
Ignor this user button is a wonderful idea.
Ignorance is a lack of knowledge, or a willful lack of desire to improve the efficiency, merit, effectiveness or usefulness of one's actions. Ignorance is also a "state of being ignorant" or unaware (not knowing).
Originally posted by Majic
Terms Of Endearment
Originally posted by Ezekiel
Im not asking the mods to debate my point for me, however I would like to see more done to members that make VERY offensive generalisations about people such as "....all freemasons are child molestors".
The only authority moderators have comes from the AboveTopSecret.com Terms And Conditions Of Use.
If a post complies with the T&C, even if it may be considered "ignorant", it would be wrong for a mod to do anything about it -- other than perhaps comment as a fellow member, which all staff members are.
There's no prohibition against being ignorant on ATS. Granted, it's not encouraged, but it's legal.
After all, what's the point of claiming to Deny Ignorance when you aren't willing to confront it?
Also, the definition of what is "knowledge" and what is "ignorance" varies wildly from one member to another.
Would you really want moderators dictating which is which?
Originally posted by mrsdudara
Like, 30, 40 pepople have this person on ignore, so obviously they need a time out, kind of thing. Where they can not make any more posts for a certin amount of time.
Originally posted by Ezekiel
Of course I dont want moderators to censor people and to dictate 'which is which'. However I dont think it is too much to ask to caution people or give them warnings for posting offensive generalisations such as the one I mentioned above.
If the mods are prepared to let people go ahead make threads which claim things like "freemasons are all child molesting satanists" without having a conspiracy theme to the thread (Which is the point of these forums, is it not?) then I am seriously disapointed.