It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
I do not for one minute believe that this nation today called Israel has any Biblical right to this land. None. This is not the Israel of the Bible. Not possible.
I do however believe they have right to this land by the age old dictum of the victors get the spoils. They will have to fight to the end to keep what they have won.
Thanks,
Orangetom
America is one of the few nations of which I know, dumb enough to go to war over and over, and not bring home any spoils.
Originally posted by orangetom1999
The ancient word for them was Hebrews...not jews. Jews is more of a modern construct.
[edit on 25-6-2007 by orangetom1999]
Let us assume for argument that they are ,sometime down the road, able to take the temple mount and rebuild the temple.
It is obvious that no one died under the Olde Testament
Also it is obvious to anyone thinking on this that part of what we think of as the New Testament is actually under the Olde Testament until the death of the testator...which puts the New Testament in effect. The death of the Nazarene put the New Testament into effect at that very moment. Until that moment it was still Olde Testament.
What you have in current day Israel is a counterfit construction of men. It must be constantly supported by outside nations. Most of what we call Jews today in Israel are secular and not religious as in the Olde Testament.
Israel in the term used in the Bible as pertains to a New Testament people is not a physical people as in the people of the circumcision...but the Church. This is the New Testament Israel...of every kindred and tounge on the earth. New Testament circumcision is the circumcision of the heart not physical circumcision. Are there people in this New Testament group who are also Jews in the physical sense.?? You betcha!!. But they are not chosen on the basis of heir Jewishness. THey are chosen by God..for his purposes..not mens purposes.
America is one of the few nations of which I know, dumb enough to go to war over and over, and not bring home any spoils. Only a nation as economically affluent as America can be so dumb as to go to war over and over yet not bring home any real spoils and still survive/continue on. Most nations would have long ago folded on such stupidity.
Originally posted by the_sentinal
jordanian king abdullah said his country is interested in a nuclear-free middle east
Should Israel Have Nukes???
Originally posted by bodrul
iif they start losing a fight they would use them.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
So what? The knowledge that Israel would nuke whoever destroys it is the only thing keeping the Islamics from destroying it now.
Israel has a right to defend itself. Holding nukes accomplishes that.
[edit on 6/26/2007 by FlyersFan]
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Holding nukes accomplishes that.
[edit on 6/26/2007 by FlyersFan]
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Daedalus3,
I pretty much agree with your post with one exception.
....
THe Israelis "WILL" push the button in the end. Of this I have no doubt. It is just a matter of when not if. Most of my fellow Americans are so dumb and secure behind thier television sets, their steering wheels of their cars, and thier deceitful politicians they havent a clue. They are asleep.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
If Israel had gone nuclear, it would've been the end of them.
I don't know their stockpile at the time and what the release strategy was(all-out or graduated:depending on Arab/International response), but things would've got very messy.
Anybody have ideas about their nuclear release strategy at the time?
I'm very curious to know that.
Originally posted by the_sentinal
my question is should israel have nukes?? because without them i believe they would be overthrown in a instant....so what's the answer??
www.ynetnews.com...
Originally posted by bodrul
i love it when people justify israel to have nukes with their past records
iligaly occupying land (ignoring UN laws on occupation)
killing cuvilians
attacking its neigbours
a country like that needs to be kept on a leash.
not given the right to nukes.
if they start losing a fight they would use them.
Originally posted by waynos
Hmmm, 'should Israel have nukes'?
Dropped on it, maybe.
I wouldn't give them the s*** off the bottom of my shoe, Reprehensible country.
You'd think after the suffering of their people during the War at the hands of the Nazi's they'd be the last country to go round dishing it out in the name of 'defence'.
Two faced liars that they are, of course families picnicing on a beach are a threat to national security aren't they? Tossers.
[edit on 22-6-2006 by waynos]
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
How did Israeil show great restraint against Sadame, they were ordered by America not to do anything, and a nuclear strike would of been completely over the top and wrong. Israeil obviously needs nukes for it`s protection but why is it there in the first place? becasue they stole the country from the Palestinians whatever way you lok at it.
Originally posted by American Madman
Stole? That is a very subjective term... From what I understand most of the sand box over there is full of roaming tribes. The only governments/nations so to speak were set up for them. The only ones that function and help the people are those aligned with the US and have ties to israel.
The rule of law in that region is that of force. Seems to me they followed the laws over there and have taken an undeveloped wasteland and have forged a nation which includes over a million arabs.
As for the palestinians, there is no such thing. They are all refugees from other nations who kicked them out. The arabs who left israel left of there own free will.