Great work guys,
Desert, nice to see you digging in there. Good to have your help.
Regenmacher, i was hoping your attention to detail would yield results... it has bigtime
One thing i think we can probably safely assume.
It wasn't supposed to get caught.
Mexico got lucky, the plane obviously knew how to "get approval to land, and have space from other eyes". It was business as usual, with the same
airport officials as usual.
If you look back at the original articles, they mention two airport guards getting suspicious. Not the airport officials.
I think the cat was out of the bag, before the people on the inside could pay people to be quiet. That IMO is how the pilot got away... he got the
word from one of his connections (probably the lady at the counter where he was filing the adjusted flight plan), that the deal was out, and he better
scat.
If we assume that, then everything else since that point, can be a very good lesson on how and when (and at what stage) do they initiate new disinfo,
or new red herrings, and even the various methods of damage control that are used.
Also, apparently Brent had been sold out... hung to dry... maybe he is willing to give his side of the story eventually.
Desert my friend, you are starting to see the levels... dont get scared, we are merely traveling a well traveled road of discovery...
We are not the first, and we wont be the last.
The truth is more than most people are ready for, but the more that know, the easier causing change shall be.
Having the head of the CIA connected to some of the scummiest deals in this decade doesn't hurt the process of change...
In fact, our new CIA head, seems to be a potential "wrench in the works" of those that would misuse the CIA.