It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thermopolis
And when it comes to nukes being developed by insane islamic countries screw the treaties, stop the insane..........
Nuclear Arms for Deterrence or Fighting?
In its Nuclear Posture Review, the Pentagon cites the need for new nuclear arms that could have a lower yield and produce less nuclear fallout. The weapons, the Pentagon said, could be designed to destroy underground complexes, including stores of chemical and biological arms. The targets might be situated in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya or North Korea, a reorientation away from cold war scenarios involving Russia.
... “Throughout the nuclear age, the fundamental goal has been to prevent the use of nuclear weapons,” said Ivo Daalder, a foreign policy specialist at the Brookings Institution. “Now the policy has been turned upside down. It is to keep nuclear weapons as a tool of war-fighting rather than a tool of deterrence. If military planners are now to consider the nuclear option any time they confront a surprising military development, the distinction between nuclear and non-nuclear weapons fades away.”
... Mr. Bush’s Pentagon has also pushed for new and more usable nuclear weapons.
The Nuclear Option in Iraq
The U.S. has lowered the bar for using the ultimate weapon
First, if the United States lowers the nuclear threshold -- even as a possibility -- it raises the likelihood that other nations will lower their own thresholds and employ nuclear weapons in situations where they simply need a stronger military punch. Until now, the United States has reserved nuclear weapons for retaliation against nuclear attacks or immediate threats to national survival, a standard tacitly but widely accepted around the world. If the president believes that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein poses that kind of danger to the United States, he has failed to convince the world -- and many U.S. citizens.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Souljah, this topic is about an Iranian Mullah saying it is alright for Iran to have nuclear weapons, and it is alright for Iran to use nuclear weapons when the world has nuclear weapons.
Rice Asks for $75 Million to Increase Pressure on Iran
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked Congress yesterday to provide $75 million in emergency funding to step up pressure on the Iranian government, including expanding radio and television broadcasts into Iran and promoting internal opposition to the rule of religious leaders.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Souljah, i think we all know by now that you hate the U.S., Israel and the west in general, but that is not the topic in this thread, so stay on topic please. Thanks....
Originally posted by Muaddib
I don't think this is propaganda. European countries, and even Russia have have the same opinion on the real purposes for Iran's nuclear technology.
I haven't seen nor heard the U.S., Israel, nor Europe, say they should wipe off any other nations.
[edit on 20-2-2006 by Muaddib]
Originally posted by grover
I love it when you throw out that old chestnut about hating America...its so damned cute of you, just because somebody disagrees with you or the administrations policies, they hate the West.
Originally posted by Muaddib
There are always religious fanatics in all religions, the problem is when a regime, such as Iran keeps proclaiming and takes action to "wipe some nations off the map."
Talk is always cheap...but Iran has not taken action to wipe some nation off the map, just spouted alot of hostile retoric...as have we. The Republicans have had a war-on over Iran ever since the hostage crisis in the late 70's, and after Bushes lies about Iraq to get the war he wanted, I have to take what his administration says about other countries with a large shaker of salt. I know the Iranian president is a jackass and said some pretty beligerent things but so hasn't Bush...I just can't help but see them as two numb nut bullies puffing up their chests and strutting around the playground.
Originally posted by grover
Yeah I know...you keep saying what all the other countries were saying about Iraq and WMD, but guess what, they were wrong.
Originally posted by grover
To suggest that Saddam, on the verge of being invaded, opted not to use them and moved them out of the country instead to say, Syria is laughable. I am no big fan of the Iranian government, I don't back it or support it, I know alot of Iranian Baha'i's and I know what they have been through. All I am saying is that given the Bush track record...I think anyone with half a brain (or consious) would have to take them with a grain of salt this time...sounds too much like wolf to me...what was that old saw Bush couldn't work his mouth around saying...fool me once...............