We are not the first to accuse the film of being faked. We have shown photographs here that we believe to be faked to hide what really went on in this
part of the sequnce.
Over the years there has been much debate whether the autopsy photos were faked and whether the Zapruder film was faked to. If you read the entire
thread here you will know the film wasn't released publicly until the mid 70's. 4 Black and white stills were released in 64
What we are concerned with is Green man and his companion "companions". Take a look at the frames we have shown here and on
We believe that Zapruder has been edited and is fake because this man's (mens) bodies do not "fit" as we have
explained. and they have some weird objects and head placements. They say Green man is black, yet he has white hands in some frames and the back of
his neck in others is also white, albeit tanned.
As previously stated the is much controversy over whether the head shot section is faked and whether the driver did it section has been faked. But
over the years Green man and his companion have been ignored, even though when you look at the film closely He is shown to make some very suspicious
The green Man and his companion have never been officially identified. Yet every single other person in Dealey Plaza that day has been dissected,
pulled apart and the timing of them picking their nose or scratching their backsides recorded in the most minute detail. But everyone leaves Green man
and the actions alone.
When we first viewed the film Green man stuck out to us straight away, the objects in hands, the pixelization that doesn't quite match and so on but
it wasn't until we dissected green man and his companion that we found things were not as they appeared to be.
Of course this is only theory, everything surrounding the JFK assassination is theory. What we ask is for people to take carefully observations of the
film and stills themselves, they may see something different.
But back to the faking of the film. As we stated we are not the first to come up with the theory that the Zapruder Film is faked.
Today, we all know what happens when you fast-forward (“picture search”) a videotape: not only does everyone move quickly, but their actions are
much too jerky.
When the forgers made the Zapruder film, they needed to use genuine film of the limousine and the people in it, to make it look realistic—they
couldn’t just get Warner Brothers to draw cartoons! They cut and paste this genuine film into a new background film of Elm Street.
Some changes could be made. They could cut people out and move them around a bit. They could make copies of arms, legs and bodies, and stick them back
together to make them perform actions that the real people never did.
The final uptake, Zapruder has it in the can, the film as it sit’s in the camera, BEFORE it get’s to Kodak is the LAST time we can know for sure
that it’s in it’s original state. All bets are off when that film enters Kodak - Dallas. We’re told Kodak can’t do the optical prints, fine
Jamieson Film can do them. That’s the first RED flag for me Kodak* doesn’t have any Double 8mm PRINT stock available - gott’a use camera stock
for print’s ah, yeah... right. Let me get this straight Kodak only sells film and film processing, that’s their corporate mission, their lifeblood
even. And NO print film for the film of the CENTURY? (A project that may provide a little interest is why camera original film was used for the
Zapruder optical prints -- could bumping from 8mm to 16mm look a lot better if it’s coming off of Kodacolor camera stock? hmm. Of course it does ! !
! Oh... by the way, over the years we’ve been told about emulsion side out stuff regarding the ZAP film can’t this - that.... maybe one of these
photo experts on the LN side of the aisle would provide me with the proper definition of bipack film printing more commonly called emulsion to
emulsion printing.. One could make ANY camera original duplicate in a bipack setup look exactly like the original -- emulsion side out ... for the
edge numbers, I hope this doesn’t come as to much of a shock but there is film manufactured withOUT edge #’s and footage count
The above paragraph and the two below it in the articl explain your questions.
* There are magnification anomalies in the film for which there appears to be no credible natural or innocent explanation. One clear example of this
is the measured width between the two posts on the back side of the Stemmons Freeway sign from Z312-318. This distance increases by over 12 percent in
only six frames. Yet, from Z191-207 the interval remains constant. Some might attempt to explain this anomaly by suggesting that the lens was
nonlinear for objects so far off the central axis. But, even if
Ed O Hagan was born in Northern Ireland and currently resides in Canada, he has studied the assassination and Zapruder film intensively. Ed has
produced evidence which he believes shows that the Zapruder film has been altered. Ed believes that if the film had not been altered, the footage
would show that a shot could not have originated in the Texas School Book Depository, thus ruling out Lee harvey Oswald as President Kennedys
the Secret Service copies of the Zapruder film which is badly damaged, you should inquire as to why it is so badly damaged with the Secret Service. It
is broken and ruined in a lot of places. How could this have happened? How could they take such critical evidence in this tragedy and it be ruined?
But this visual evidence in this case is the key to the murder of John Kennedy because it is all fake, and I mean the Zapruder film is a fake.
The autopsy photographs are a fake. The autopsy X-rays are a fake. We first determined this in 1979
So yes, there are some others who also hold the theory that Zapruder is faked. Other say Zapruder is real and use it for complete evidence of the day.
You may be able to find the same amount of links we have given saying Zapruder is real. I think each person must look closely and judge for
All we ask is to look for oneself, closely at the Green man section. We can't called him by name like we can The Newmans, Little Rosemary Willis and
her parents, Altgens (the press photographer) Bronson, Zapruder, Moorman Hill, Charles Brehms and the others there that day, because he has not been
identified. He and his companion or companions are invisible men.
One researcher puts Jim Hicks across the road from Umbrella Man, but others put Jim Hicks up at the corener and others on the same side of street near
We just think its odd that no one has mentioned Green man before today, no One has dissected him and his companion and found out what colour underwear
they were wearing on the day and whether they had a handkerchief showing. I read one researcher comment he wasn't aware till he saw something that
Jean Hill's slip was showing. Hmm Had me I thought she was wearing trousers,
Point is --- Our theory is that Green man is suspicious and it certainly looks like he has been edited for something in that section to be covered up.
Its a theory, as close to proof we have is by showing you the pictures we have shown. Other people think other photos have been faked, we tend to
agree. Yet others think that the Autopsy photos are fake, we don't know about that we havne't really looked. Others think there is something fishy
about how a set of pipes turn up in an fbi photo to be different to how they were when Oswald apparently took the shot. Ok the pipes were changed, OR
the photo was faked. Yet others think the whole thing is real.
They are all theories but we believe as others have in the past that the Zapruder film is fishy.
And we strongly believe that Green Man and his companion or companions are hugely fishy.
[edit on 1-1-2006 by Mayet]