It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Kennedy Assassination: The Nixon-Bush Connection
A newly discovered FBI document reveals that George Bush was directly involved in the 1963 murder of President John Kennedy.
On the day of the assassination Bush was in Texas, but he denies knowing exactly where he was. Since he had been the supervisor for the secret Cuban teams, headed by former Cuban police commander Felix Rodriguez, since 1960, it is likely Bush was also in Dallas in 1963. Several of the Cubans he was supervising as dirty-tricks teams for Nixon, were photographed in the Zagruder film.
According to a biography of Richard Nixon, his close personal and political ties with the Bush family go back to 1941 when Nixon claims he read an ad in an L A. newspaper, placed by a wealthy group of businessmen, led by Prescot Bush, the father of George Bush. They wanted a young, malleable candidate to run for Congress. Nixon applied for the position and won the job. Nixon became a mouthpiece for the Bush group. (Source: Freedom Magazine, 1986, L.F. Prouty).
In fact, Prescot Bush is credited with creating the winning ticket of Eisenhower-Nixon in 1952.(Source: George Bush, F. Green, Hipocrene, 1988).
Newly discovered FBI documents prove that Jack Ruby has been an employee of Richard Nixon since 1947. That that [sic] FBI document Ruby is listed as working as a spy & hit man for Nixon. On Nov. 22, 63 Ruby was seen by a women who knew him well, Julian Ann Mercer, approximately an hour before the arrival of JFK's motorcade, unloading a man carrying a rifle in a case at the Grassy Knoll from his car. Ruby later was seen on national TV killing a witness who could link Nixon & Bush to the killing of JFK: Oswald. On the Trail of the Assassins, Garrison, p xiii.
Originally posted by Valhall
Originally posted by Mayet
New things are found in all the photos everytime they are looked at. I would just ask people to look for themselves, experimeSnt with the photos and see if they can work out the lies from the truth. Watch the films, read the statements, it is one big fiasco of red herrings and really I wouldn't be surprised sometimes if Dealey Place never happened and it was all fake.
So your theory is that the assassination didn't take place at all? And part of that theory is relying on the insinuation that it wasn't Jackie, et. al. in the car?
Will you please comment on the fact that you have used Connally's eyeball as a button in this theory?
Also, do you have any follow-up thoughts on whose brain and blood is still splattered all over Jackie's face in this close up
Originally posted by djohnsto77
There are a lot of unanswered questions about the JFK assassination, but most of the stuff here just seems like off-the-deep-end paranoia to me...
James Olmstead, who likes to refer to himself as a JFK researcher and not a buff, said he has determined that the museum has pipes in the wrong position on the sixth floor of a book depository Ï the perch from where Lee Harvey Oswald reportedly shot the wildly popular president on Nov. 22, 1963.
Officials at the Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas agree with Olmstead and are beginning the tedious process of determining how and when the mistake was made, trying to correct it and, more importantly, analyzing what it means
Olmstead said he questions how the pipes were positioned when those photos were taken.
But he said he still believes Oswald would have had room to shoot Kennedy even if the pipes butted out farther into the room than the way in which they are portrayed in various pictures published by the Warren Commission.
Today, we all know what happens when you fast-forward (“picture search”) a videotape: not only does everyone move quickly, but their actions are much too jerky.
When the forgers made the Zapruder film, they needed to use genuine film of the limousine and the people in it, to make it look realistic—they couldn’t just get Warner Brothers to draw cartoons! They cut and paste this genuine film into a new background film of Elm Street.
Some changes could be made. They could cut people out and move them around a bit. They could make copies of arms, legs and bodies, and stick them back together to make them perform actions that the real people never did.
The final uptake, Zapruder has it in the can, the film as it sit’s in the camera, BEFORE it get’s to Kodak is the LAST time we can know for sure that it’s in it’s original state. All bets are off when that film enters Kodak - Dallas. We’re told Kodak can’t do the optical prints, fine Jamieson Film can do them. That’s the first RED flag for me Kodak* doesn’t have any Double 8mm PRINT stock available - gott’a use camera stock for print’s ah, yeah... right. Let me get this straight Kodak only sells film and film processing, that’s their corporate mission, their lifeblood even. And NO print film for the film of the CENTURY? (A project that may provide a little interest is why camera original film was used for the Zapruder optical prints -- could bumping from 8mm to 16mm look a lot better if it’s coming off of Kodacolor camera stock? hmm. Of course it does ! ! ! Oh... by the way, over the years we’ve been told about emulsion side out stuff regarding the ZAP film can’t this - that.... maybe one of these photo experts on the LN side of the aisle would provide me with the proper definition of bipack film printing more commonly called emulsion to emulsion printing.. One could make ANY camera original duplicate in a bipack setup look exactly like the original -- emulsion side out ... for the edge numbers, I hope this doesn’t come as to much of a shock but there is film manufactured withOUT edge #’s and footage count indications.
* There are magnification anomalies in the film for which there appears to be no credible natural or innocent explanation. One clear example of this is the measured width between the two posts on the back side of the Stemmons Freeway sign from Z312-318. This distance increases by over 12 percent in only six frames. Yet, from Z191-207 the interval remains constant. Some might attempt to explain this anomaly by suggesting that the lens was nonlinear for objects so far off the central axis. But, even if
Ed O Hagan was born in Northern Ireland and currently resides in Canada, he has studied the assassination and Zapruder film intensively. Ed has produced evidence which he believes shows that the Zapruder film has been altered. Ed believes that if the film had not been altered, the footage would show that a shot could not have originated in the Texas School Book Depository, thus ruling out Lee harvey Oswald as President Kennedys assassin.
the Secret Service copies of the Zapruder film which is badly damaged, you should inquire as to why it is so badly damaged with the Secret Service. It is broken and ruined in a lot of places. How could this have happened? How could they take such critical evidence in this tragedy and it be ruined? But this visual evidence in this case is the key to the murder of John Kennedy because it is all fake, and I mean the Zapruder film is a fake.
The autopsy photographs are a fake. The autopsy X-rays are a fake. We first determined this in 1979
We believe that Zapruder has been edited and is fake because this man's (mens) bodies do not "fit" as we have explained. and they have some weird objects and head placements. They say Green man is black, yet he has white hands in some frames and the back of his neck in others is also white, albeit tanned.
Its not about creating a conspiracy, its about revealing a truth through a thousand lies.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
There's no need to take this route. I don't see this as adding much to serious JFK research because even if these are men sprinting, hiding a rifle or whatever, it simply cannot be corroborated or verified. The driver shooting JFK thing was argued in a another thread, where I admit some frames may have been removed, but altering a moving image on film is not practical at the time of JFKs death nor afterward unless seriously gifted artists worked on the process. I suppose this could have happened since the murder itself was well-engineered. You'd have to have some unknown artist come forward to say he'd worked on it. No agency hack could do it.
But how was it possible to alter the film? Right after the assassination, the film was brought to a photo studio in Dallas, where it was developed. The official story says that Zapruder sold the original and one copy to Lifemagazine for $150,000 the next day and gave the other two copies to the Secret Service ((which gave one of these copies to the FBI). There is a strong indication that the National Photographic Interpretation Center (NPIC, a CIA department) conducted a study of the original film on the night of the assassination.
Was it possible that the conspirators got the film to Washington on the day of the assassination and back the next day? Livingstone says yes., explaining they would only have had to delude Zapruder and use jets to fly the film to Washington the night of November 22 and back on the next day. The technology to alter a film already existed in 1963.
Today, the original Zapruder film is in cold storage in the National Archives. On August 1, the film became the property of the U.S. government, but the FBI has to pay a “fair” price for it to the Zapruder family.
If JFK's murder was to have anything done about it, it would have been done by the house select comittee on assassinations. When this committee threw out valid links and ignored impartial investigators, Americans had their last chance to make an issue of JFK. They didn't care, and this was surely forseen by JFKs ultimate murderers.
Let us say that a different clip of film is produced which clearly shows Green Man stuffing half of a rifle down his pants. So then, we have proven what exactly? That the murderers were stupid enough to have some guy running toward JFK's limo, in flat open space, right in front of everyone, firing some kind of strange hipshot bullet, right past Jackie and into the other side of JFK's head? Forgive me if I'm missing part of this scenario.
You're fighting Peter Jennings and the bulk of the media if you stray from the party line regarding JFK. Saying Zapruder's frames were painted or tweaked is not going to get the job done.
Its not about who we are are fighting by going against this official line, its about having a say against a massively prepetrated lie. If it doesn't get the job done so be it. t least we have said our piece at least we tried to set the record straight.
".... A newly discovered FBI document reveals that George Bush was directly involved in the 1963 murder of President John Kennedy.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Just like Star Wars, eh?
OMG!!! Did you just link the editing of JFK material with a block buster motion picture boasting incredible new technology.I admire your huge balls...even i wouldnt say that out loud
and if the Zapruder films show faking on the head shot, faking of the driver "gun" and faking of the green man, does this mean the whole film is faked? The film rights were bought by the editor of Time, Henry Luce, an anti Kennedy person. He locke dthe film away and died himself in 1967. The Zapruder film was finally released in 1975. Star Wars was released in 1977 which can give you an idea of special effects able to be created in the 70's.