It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
If you think Israel wouldn't be able to detect or notice anyone (especially Arab or Palestinian people) attempting to bring something like that across her borders I think you are dreaming.
Originally posted by rogue1
Hmm, if you looked at a map, you'd realise Israel has a coast on the sea.
Palestinian terrorists have come ashore from the sea on more than one occassion.
They could easily bring a nuclear weapon by speedboat into a city like Tel Aviv and detnate it without having to use a truck.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- Who said anything about "massive"?
I'm talking a small to medium sized truck (around the 7.5 tonnes level or so).
If you think Israel wouldn't be able to detect or notice anyone (especially Arab or Palestinian people) attempting to bring something like that across her borders I think you are dreaming.
[edit on 1-11-2005 by sminkeypinkey]
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
I suspect that 'softball' or grapefruit sized amount of nuclear material would probably need one hell of a lot of shielding to stop it being detected and/or, in any case, poisoning to the point of total incapacity and/or death the fool handling it.
[edit on 2-11-2005 by sminkeypinkey]
Originally posted by abovereproach
Sminkey-pinkey--Of course the Iranians do not "see" themselves as Arab people because they aren't--they're Indo-Europeans like us.
I'm glad you're so comfortable in your "knowledge" that Iran would not "suicide" its people. I can only hope you're right.
During the Iran-Iraq War the Iranians were more than willing to "suicide" their youngest and most vulnerable citizens--they sent in preteen and early-teen boys as cannon-fodder ahead of the armed older soldiers against Iraqi troops, which proceeded to slaughter these children en masse.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
You would be wrong though
Thats all the lead shielding you need for 100 grams of weapons grade uranium. The uranium and shielding weighed a massive 15 kilograms.
If you ever seen the containers used by goverments for Nulcear material you would realize how very small they can be.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Even Hitler didn't suicide the German nation as all was utterly lost
(and with German stocks of Sarin and Tabun nerve gas that's what he knew he probably could have done if he'd tried using those gases.
....it was made known to Germany that if they did use any secret gases - the allies didn't know about the nerve gases but suspected something - that the allies would drench Germany from one end to the other in anthrax, which we did have.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Frankly if it were all as incredibly easy as you (and one or two others here)prefer to imagine I doubt we would not have had the several decades (since the invention of 'the bomb') free from nuclear terrorism that we have had.
Originally posted by rogue1
A grossly wrong and simplistic view.
I wasn't aware that Arab countries built nuclear reactors decades ago.
I only say this because how else would they get their plutonium and Uranium.
Why is nuclear terrorism more likely now, you ask. Very simple - unstable countries are pushing ahead with nuclear programs adn of course the vast amount of material in the former USSR.
By far the hardest part is obtaining fissile material, the rest is easy
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Originally posted by rogue1
A grossly wrong and simplistic view.
- Really?
Considering the well documented stories of nuclear materials going missing over the years from various research, power stations, reprocessing and testing facilities I'd say yours is the wrong and simplistic view.
I wasn't aware that Arab countries built nuclear reactors decades ago.
- Er, who said they did?
I only say this because how else would they get their plutonium and Uranium.
- Possibly from some of those stolen(?) materials?
Why is nuclear terrorism more likely now, you ask. Very simple - unstable countries are pushing ahead with nuclear programs adn of course the vast amount of material in the former USSR.
- Of course you'llbe able to back up claims that the former USSR is the source of "vast" amounts of nuclear materials?
Yeah right.
Urban myths once again.
You'll be wanting to talk about missing suitcase bombs next.
Iran can produce about a thousand tons of chemical agents a year.
Originally posted by ZPE StarPilot
I'll jump in here...
I've read that Iran's first nuclear weapon will probably be about the size of a railroad boxcar. It probably won't be going anywhere.
That's about 12 times the size of the third one built by the USA, and we used a B-29 to haul it, barely.
Originally posted by rogue1
nulcear materials very rarely refer to weapons grade material
The fact that Arab countries are making or attempting to make nuclear weapons programs, the fundamental core of these projects is a nuclear reactor.
There are any amount of accounts of lax safeguards in Russia
hell the US has spent hundreds of millions trying to improve security in the former USSR.
All I can say is do some reading. Try one of Helen Caldicotts books. You should strive to inform yourself more sminkey, broaden your knowlege
Originally posted by rogue1
It was Hitler who said that the German people had failed him and all they deserved was destruction.
Anyway, Hitler probably did order the use of nerve agents, but the orders were countermanded by Otto Ambros - accordng to his own testimony.
Otto Ambros was the head of the Nazi nerve gas division.
So your point is completely wrong and misinformed
If Hitler could have fought to the last German he would have, you seem to be a bit misinformed about the history of WWII.
Hitler probably did order the use of nerve agents
Originally posted by ZPE StarPilot
I think I'd worry more about the inventory of several thousand tons of various chemical agents, including sulfur mustard, phosgene, and cyanide agents.
Iran can produce about a thousand tons of chemical agents a year.