It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by snafu7700
i posted the following on another thread, and got no response, so i'll try with my own thread.
please keep in mind that the following is just MHO. i have no proof to back it up. i would like other opinions as to why this is or is not a possibility.
i've been doing alot of thinking about this supposed iranian nuclear program, and i'm beginning to think they dont intend to use nukes on israel. i think they intend to even the odds so that a conventional attack is more feasible. you see, israel has made it very clear that if they are attacked en-masse, and it looks as though they will lose, they will use the nuclear option. this is probably the only thing that has kept the relative peace. but if iran has nukes, the israeli nuclear option is no longer feasible, as its whole point is to stop an attack in its tracks, and allow israel to survive. if the playing field is level, israel no longer has the option of using nukes, as they will be used in return. this makes it a completely conventional war....a war that israel could possibly lose.
the only caveat to this theory is whether or not israel, in the face of defeat would have the "we're dead anyway, lets take em with us" attitude. but theyve managed to survive as a people for thousands of years in other lands, they might have the attitude of "abandon ship and try again another time."
you guys think i'm totally nuts or what?
Originally posted by Rasputin13
I just don't think that Iran alone can defeat Israel in a convential war.
Originally posted by Mainer
Being a nuclear power is a lot more than missles. Its an elite club, and you need to do a test to get into it. Its not really about explosions after that first one, its about the new political realities.
Originally posted by AlienChaser
right on, Iran does not have what it takes as far as modern
military technology to challenge Isreal,
Originally posted by snafu7700
the only caveat to this theory is whether or not israel, in the face of defeat would have the "we're dead anyway, lets take em with us" attitude.
Originally posted by AlienChaser
Originally posted by AlienChaser
right on, Iran does not have what it takes as far as modern
military technology to challenge Isreal,
NR
I am sorry if you were offended by my comment it was only my opinion.
I was not intending to pick a fight.
I think we could agree that everyone everywhere
would just prefer PEACE