It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From "Pistis Sophia Unveiled"
"The code of Lucifer is the Arcanum A.Z.F., the sexual force.
"Unquestionably, the creative power of the Logos is in the creative organs.
"The splendorous, interior, profound Sun shines on the path of the Initiate.
"The luminous sexual force shines most exceedingly in the aura of the Christified Ones.
"In the final synthesis, the sexual force comes from the Light of lights, which is precisely the Logos....."
"It is obvious that through sex we descend, we fall, or we ascend.
"Lucifer, the Maker of Light, is within the Mysteries of sex.
"Lucifer is the stairs to descend. Lucifer is the stairs to ascend.
"We must distinguish between a fall and a descent...."
"...However, when they arise again, the Intimate Christ smites their horrible Python Serpent with seven heads, the Tempting Serpent of Eden (the abominable Kundabuffer organ).
"The Lord raises us above the malignant roots of the tempting serpent so we can disintegrate even its seeds, the filthy germs of lust."
- Samael Aun Weor
"When the Mason learns that the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply energy."
From "Pistis Sophia Unveiled"
"Moses, descending from Sinai with the luminous horns upon his forehead, deserved to be chiselled by Michelangelo. The Doctrine of Moses is the Doctrine of Lucifer.
In Gnostic Christic Esoterism, we are always quoting six degrees of the conscious objective reasoning of the Being.
The degrees of development of the objective reasoning of the Being are known by the number of tridents that are shown on the horns of the Individual Lucifer, who is within each one of us.
Obviously, the Individual Lucifer within each one of us is a reflection of the Logos (Christ) within our interior. This is why he is referred to us as Christus-Lucifer.
Lucifer gives us the sexual impulse. Therefore, Lucifer is the stairs to ascend and the stairs to descend.
We arise, we ascend, when defeating Lucifer.
Lucifer, integrated with ourselves, converts us into Archangels.
When the fourth Trident appears over the horns, then the objective reasoning of the Being has been perfected up to the sacred Ternoonald.
Therefore, only two gradations remain before obtaining the Anklad degree.
The reasoning of the sacred Anklad is the most transcendental and luminous gradation that any Being can attain, and it corresponds to the third degree, in relation to the absolute reasoning of the Infinitude that sustains all.
The reasoning of the sacred Podkoolad is the final gradation before the sacred Anklad.
The fifth Trident over the horns indicates the degree of the sacred Podkoolad.
The sixth Trident over the horns marks the degree of the sacred Anklad.
It is necessary to know about the Taurinean Mysteries in order not to alarm ourselves with the luminous horns of Christus-Lucifer within each one of us.
Let us remember the horns of silver of Great Hierophants.
The horns of demons are the fatal antithesis of the horns of light.
The horns of the tenebrous ones grow in accordance with each evil action.
Therefore, we must not confuse the horns of the demons with the luminous horns of Christus-Lucifer."
- Samael Aun Weor
But one who bears a false light isn't really a "light bearer" at all. But please read on.
[
Originally posted by helen670
Lucifer........'Day star' or 'light bearer' in Heaven
Lucifer fell away from God because of Pride......He loved only himself...wanted to exalt himself above everthing and everyone.
He became Satan or the Devil........meaning slanderer or Deceiver......The Father of all LIES.
From LIGHT he became DARKNESS.
Originally posted by saint4God
Answers are "yes" and "no" only please. Does Lucifer acknowledge that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh?
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
I just wanted to ask if you agree that since Prometheus was punished for sneaking the knowledge of fire...(enlightenment?) to humanity, and in Eden the serpent did the same thing, then are they not likely to be the same character by different names?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Ah, but you set up a Catch-22 here, asking for only a "yes or no". By doing so, we must assume that (1.) Lucifer is an actual being or entity and that
Originally posted by Masonic Light
(2.) he is capable of either acknowledging or denying that Christ has come in the flesh.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
In my previous posts, I have pointed out that, in the one verse where Lucifer is mentioned in the Bible, the reference was actually to Tiglath-Pilaser III, emperor of Babylon. Secondly, the word "Lucifer" was inserted here by St. Jerome in order to take a jab at a theological opponent, St. Lucifer, who was a monk. See en.wikipedia.org...
Again, some have applied the title "Lucifer" to Christ himself, as he is the "light bearer", while others have attributed the word solely to the classical Roman myths. Still others who are Theosophists (such as Manly Hall) have used the word to refer to abstract intellectual enlightenment.
Therefore, to answer your question, it depends on which definition one uses, and cannot be discarded with a simple "yes or no". If by Lucifer we mean Tigleth-Pilaser, then obviously the answer is no, as he lived before Christ. If by Lucifer we mean St. Lucifer, who was an enemy of Jerome's, then the answer is yes, Lucifer was a Christian theologian. If by Lucifer we mean Christ, then the answer is obviously yes. If by Lucifer we mean Prometheus or Apollo, then the answer is obviously no, because these are fictional characters who represent different aspects of cosmology.
If we take the Theosophist view, the answer is also no, because the term "Lucifer" is there used as a sort natural force toward learning, and is not a person or an entity.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
, the serpent gave the fruit of the tree anyway.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
The serpent was condemned to crawl on his belly the rest of his days, Prometheus was chained to a rock to be tormented by vultures for eternity.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
There are many other parallels elsewhere. The Hebrew Eve and Greek Pandora, as well as Christ and Osiris, Samson and Hercules, and many more. I wouldn't necessarily say that the serpent is Prometheus under a different name, or that Jesus is really just the Hebrew version of Osiris, though. I would say that men often share the same sorts of ideas, and that through cultural diffusion in the ancient world, many borrowed aspects from each other, creating their own unique myth cycles.
Originally posted by saint4God
What lightbring is not an actual being? If this lucifer is not an actual being or entity, why are we bothering at all with it? There are people in this world who need help, we haven't the time to play games mixing fiction with reality.
If he is an entity, then he is capable of indicating a "yes" or a "no" in one form or another. In fact, I think it'd a gross underestimate of a supernatural intelligence to say he cannot.
Am I correct in assessing that you consider Lucifer to be a title?
What I thought was even more interesting is that I posed this question to someone who knows Lucifer and got this reply. So I'm curious, which Lucifer do you know Masonic Light, and to what degree?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
To answer your first question, the planet Venus, which was referred to as Lucifer by the Romans, may or may not qualify as a "being". The sun is also a light bringer, but it may not be a "being".
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Regardless, "mixing fiction with reality" seems to be a fundamental trait of human nature. I would recommend that it we at least look into it before completely casting it aside, as it may tell us something important about ourselves.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Nowhere have I claimed that I believe we are speaking about a supernatural intelligence. And that's the reason I wanted to pin down a definition of exactly what we were discussing.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Hmmm....I would probably say "description" rather than "title", but I think you see where I'm coming from.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
I don't know any Lucifers, but I tend to take the theosophic approach toward the word, which is probably one of the bases of the Christian Lucifer/devil belief. I agree with Pike (or, actually with Levi, whom Pike was merely quoting) that what we are speaking of here is not a person, but a force. The Church Fathers who accepted the devil/Lucifer story held that Lucifer was a title, and therefore could no longer describe satan. "Lucifer" was only the title he held before the fall, which he forfeited.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
If this is the exoteric covering of some sort of esoteric mysticism, I'm inclined to agree with Tamahu (and Pike and Levi), as well as Freud, who called the subconsciousness (home of the libido) "the devil".
Originally posted by Masonic Light
This is an important concept in both mysticism and Jungian psychology, but doubt many people on this forum are interested in the entire story. Suffice it say that the occult definition of "the devil" is that force of animalistic instinct which plagues us, which once being a pure force ("Lucifer"), has degraded into materialism. The devil is often pictorially represented as Pan, the goat god of the Greeks, because he represents the animal inside us.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
This is also connected to the symbol of the inverted pentagram, which represents spirit being dominated by matter, and has since ancient times been a symbol of the uninitiated.
Originally posted by saint4God
Oh yeah, everything is worth looking at it, but when it's unimportant then it needs to be shelved. Being consumed with pretendland is hazardous to your spiritual health. Or, at least it was to mine before knowing God.
Help me out please, where's that written?
Initiated? By whom? Is there a ritual involving taking an inverted pentagram and turning it upwards symbolic of enlightment above animal tendencies?
I take it from your answer (that you don't know any Lucifers) that it is not a part of Masonic teachings, would that be right?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
But one man's pretendland is another's absolute certainty.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
"In the fully-developed Christian interpretation, Jerome's Vulgate translation of Isaiah 14:12 has made Lucifer the name of the principal fallen angel, who must lament the loss of his original glory as the morning star. This image at last defines the character of Lucifer; where the Church Fathers had maintained that lucifer was not the proper name of the Devil, and that it referred rather to the state from which he had fallen; St. Jerome transformed it into Satan's proper name."
Originally posted by Masonic Light
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Masonic Light
The symbol was used by the Pythagoreans in this regard, and probably was borrowed from them by the Eleusinian Mysteries. It was also used in this regard in the Academy by the Platonists, although probably not in ritual form as was the case with the Pythagoreans and Mysteries.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
The word "Lucifer" is not found in Masonic ritual, and there are no Masonic teachings concerning it. The word is found three times in Pike's "Morals and Dogma", once in his Legenda for the 32°, once in Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, and once in Hall's "The Lost Keys of Freemasonry". In all the Masonic books I own or have read (which are many), these are the only times I remember ever coming across the word "Lucifer", and each uses it in the theosophical sense (as each were interested in theosophy as well as Masonry).
But the teachings on "Lucifer" which I mentioned in my last post are purely Theosophical teachings, not Masonic ones.
Originally posted by gps777
I can only view it that Lucifer/devil/Satan/King Tyre in Isiaiah 14:12 was clearly spoken in a derogitory way that even in this confusion means next to nothing,which is why i said that either way it will not affect my faith or understanding one iota, Christ is and should be our focus and Lucifer/Devil/Satan/FalseLightBearer/FalseProphet/KingofBabylon etc has fallen from God.
Would that make sense or be correct to how i view it in your opinion?
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by gps777
I can only view it that Lucifer/devil/Satan/King Tyre in Isiaiah 14:12 was clearly spoken in a derogitory way that even in this confusion means next to nothing,which is why i said that either way it will not affect my faith or understanding one iota, Christ is and should be our focus and Lucifer/Devil/Satan/FalseLightBearer/FalseProphet/KingofBabylon etc has fallen from God.
Would that make sense or be correct to how i view it in your opinion?
I'm good for that.