It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cyberdude78
Please excuse my ignorance FredT, but could you do me a huge favor and explain exactly what that means?.
Originally posted by FredT
One of the appeals judges in on the short list the President is making to replace Rhenquist. What better way to show loyalty. Its a perplexing decision and the US. SC will no doubt overturn it as it has done in a similar case.
My problem with this one is that I am troubled that no matter what he has done or intended to do, that he can be help forever without any charges whatsoever. The court are not saying he is innocent, just that you need to charge him with something, anything, to keep him locked up.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Rehnquist is now being replaced by Roberts, the O'Connor position is open again.
If you vow allegiance to a foreign power, especially one that has declared war against the United States (as al Qaeda has) you lose your rights,
Originally posted by cyberdude78
But to add to what I've said earlier, I don't think this person deserves constitutional rights if they're guilty. Simply put, you try killing US citizens (thats infringing on the rights of others I believe) you deserve to lose your rights.
Originally posted by FredT
Yes, i would not argue with that. Like I said, my problem lie with not charging him with anything and the fact that he can remain so for the rest of his life without a single charge.
Originally posted by shots
The only real differance as I see it is where the two were arrested; one out of the country and one in the country.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Padilla was arrested at an international airport before being admitted into the country, so technically he wasn't arrested in the country.