HAARP and Hurricane Katrina, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 8-9-2005 @ 08:32 AM by Astronomer68
Originally posted by CPYKOmega

How much do you actually know about HAARP? Please enlighten me regarding your in depth research regarding HAARP. Because, frankly, this post shows you know little about the operation.


CPYKOmega I worked in military communications for several years. Do you have any idea just how important to HF communications the Ionosphere is?
Further, are you aware of the links between the Ionosphere, the Van Allen Radiation Belt, The interaction between the Earth's and Sun's magnetic fields and natural HF electromagnetic energy?

Every day people all over the world check on the varying heights and densities of the various Ionospheric layers just to be able to predict what HF frequencies will be of the most use for various applications. In the absence of landlines and satellites, HF radio is one of the very few ways we have of communicating over long distances. (There is meteor burst transmission, but it is not really reliable enough for critical applications.)

The energy poured into the Ionosphere by the Sun is many, many orders of magnitude higher that what HAARP is capable of; however, given just the right stimulus at just the right time the Ionosphere can interact with the Van Allen belts (when they lower and become dangerous to sensitive satellites and people) to cause the height and intensity of the Van Allen belts to change, thus lessening or eleminating the danger (at least that's the hope). HAARP may be able to provide the correct stimulus; however, HAARP has no effect on the weather or people that I'm aware of (unless you're talking about people in the same location as HAARP when it transmits). HAARP has nowhere near enough power to radically affect the Ionosphere, much less tectonic activity or the weather.


reply posted on 11-9-2005 @ 09:29 AM by fingapointa
Link

this is a website of a meteorologist who has looked at lots of satelite pics, weather forecasts, etc. and thinks somehtin's up. Has an interesting arial photo of the eyewall of Katrina:
ImageLink

from this site (somewhere):

Link

but of course this doesn't mean haarp necessarilly did it...



reply posted on 30-9-2005 @ 02:43 AM by redmage
Originally posted by Regenmacher
I'm not much of a HAARP did it fan either, and I have looked into it several times. If Katrina was engineered, it would be counter productive to destroy your own infrastructure, too easy to make HAARP a scapegoat, and bring the wrath of the UN down on the nation.

Weather control, as well as "weather tampering", is expressly forbidden dating from at least December 10, 1976


The catch there is that hostile use was banned against "any other State Party" but says nothing about use on your own country.

www.opcw.org...

"ARTICLE I

1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party."


Note, I'm not saying that Katrina or Rita were "engineered" but there were a few red flags such as the 90 degree turn katrina made just off the Florida coast. Usually storms "curve" since they tend to follow fronts and pressure systems and since these are never square the 90 degree turn was a bit unusual.


[edit on 30/9/05 by redmage]


reply posted on 6-10-2005 @ 09:15 AM by Bout Time
I do not think that the science exists, yet, to create weather. I do strongly believe that the science exists to manipulate weather. The storms/tsunamis are acts of God.....but what if those very conditions that influence their path/intensity are 'mangeable'? Look at my signature file - the snapshot shows an occurence ( boats eminating microwaves?) . Folks make some strong arguments on something which 'pushed' Katrina in direct line with NOLA or moved Rita from cetain landfall points in Texas, on this site here.




......"whatever those 5 spots are, they definitely are not an artifact and they are the cause of rita turning north a few miles ahead of schedule. they seem to be directed from corpus christi. my presumption is that they are ships. we have high powered microwave weapons , ship mounted, in the 90-110 GHZ range which overlaps the radar freq. used in the animation. i worked on the first ones in 1983. contract was NSG through DOD. they heat a thin surface layer of any watery target (like raindrops-though that wasnt the original intent) they are aiming UP toward top of rita. you found a definite "something" ...."



Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 9 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 17 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 5 days ago with 134 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 6 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 10 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 7 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 13 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 18 days ago with 73 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 7 hours ago, 78 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 69 replies