Originally posted by jonSUN
Sorry but I vote both are hoax's. Im not saying Big Foot doesnt exist but the first pic was taken when the guy went searching for Big Foot. So he
faked it. The second pic was taken after shopping at a costume store.
So he faked it because he was looking for it. That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my entire life (no exaggeration).
When I go shopping for a book, I find the book, the books not fake is it?
Heres another one,
A hunter goes into the woods, rifle in hand, looking for bears to shoot, he sees a bear. He shoots said bear. Bear is dead, hunter is chuffed.
So just because this fellow was actually searching for Bigfoot in no way means he faked it. If he was passionate about finding it, he would have not
faked it, it completely ruins it for everyone, including himself.
I beleive that they were in the wilderness for about two weeks prior to the sighting, this has been confirmed by friends and family (dont have a link,
saw it on an old doccy).
Why would they lug a huge costume round in the hot, sticky weather. Why not do it over a weekend? Because if that thing was simply a suit, it would
have weighed a bloody ton, all those muscles and stuff!!
I also beleive that it was not Patterson that admitted it to be a fake, he kept with the beleif that it was real to his death bed. Though I may be
wrong here, I am pretty sure I am right. It was the supposed, 'guy in the suit' that 'fessed up' Gimilin (sp?) also said that it was real, and has
never admitted it to be a fake.
For all the skeptics out there, look at Jedis post and still think its a fake, or take a gander at the stabilized footage,
Stabilized Footage
One more thing, why did the BBC use a red suit? They siad they were trying to get it as close a spossible, even down to the location, yet they use a
red suit!!! Weird.
[edit on 4-7-2005 by Zanzibar]