It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

HAL finds no takers for LCA

page: 5
0
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite

Originally posted by Stealth Spy

Originally posted by chinawhite
WHeres you proof about 7 J-10 crashs, or are you trying to mislead people again


Its you whose trying to mislead people. I never said there were 7 J-10 crashes.

Quit putting words into my mouth.

Read stuff properly.


Quote from the one and only stealthspy..posted five minutes ago and already denying it


Despite this China has had sivere and several problems with the J-10 and it has crashed several times with one killing the chief test pilot.




several means many


it dose'nt mean 7


and i still wont say stuff on education




posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stealth Spy


and its a pity you cant see the difference and i wont make any personal attacks on education.


lol....try make a personal attack on my education. im proud of it.....



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stealth Spy

Originally posted by chinawhite

Originally posted by Stealth Spy

Originally posted by chinawhite
WHeres you proof about 7 J-10 crashs, or are you trying to mislead people again


Its you whose trying to mislead people. I never said there were 7 J-10 crashes.

Quit putting words into my mouth.

Read stuff properly.


Quote from the one and only stealthspy..posted five minutes ago and already denying it


Despite this China has had sivere and several problems with the J-10 and it has crashed several times with one killing the chief test pilot.




several means many


it dose'nt mean 7


and i still wont say stuff on education


It still doesn't matter you still claimed more than one



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:19 AM
link   
there were atleast 2 crashes



[edit on 1-7-2005 by Stealth Spy]



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stealth Spy
there were atleast 2 crashes



[edit on 1-7-2005 by Stealth Spy]


when links proof source



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:26 AM
link   
one for sure and one is speculative



However, the first actual flight of the J-10 might have taken place two years earlier - in mid-1996 - but suffered from an engine malfunction with unknown consequences. In late 1997 the second flying J-10 "1002" prototype was lost in a crash which also killed the chief test pilot.


www.aeronautics.ru...

99% of engine malfunctions end up as crashes.



posted on Jul, 1 2005 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stealth Spy
one for sure and one is speculative



However, the first actual flight of the J-10 might have taken place two years earlier - in mid-1996 - but suffered from an engine malfunction with unknown consequences. In late 1997 the second flying J-10 "1002" prototype was lost in a crash which also killed the chief test pilot.


www.aeronautics.ru...

99% of engine malfunctions end up as crashes.



99% ...you have proof



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 05:32 AM
link   
IAF reluctant to place orders for LCA

BANGALORE: The indigenously developed light combat aircraft (LCA) programme is in danger of being undermined by time overruns. The Indian Air Force is delaying taking to its natural conclusion the announcement made last February by Chief of the Air Staff S.P. Tyagi that orders would be placed "soon" for 40 LCAs.

www.hindu.com...



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 05:58 AM
link   
chinawhite no IAF source has ever said that they will not buy the IAF. That is only media speculation to sell more of their copies.

All that the Indian Air Force wants is the management of the LCA to be transferred to HAL and the article makes that clear.

The IAF has alredy CONFIRMED an order for the 40 LCA's and just because they have'nt spoken anything more about it dose'nt mean that they wont buy it.

And isi'nt it ironical that you blamed this very source for being very biased to Indian developed tech and used it as an excuse for saying filth about the Kanchan armour.



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 06:02 AM
link   





lol....try make a personal attack on my education. im proud of it.....


What you had said about my launguge is not personal attack?


[edit on 11-7-2005 by mirza2003]



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 06:10 AM
link   
well said mirza; chinawhite makes personal attacks and says terrible things to other people for some typo-errors and talks badly of other people's education ...and look at his own esteemed english above;

chinawhite before you pick on mirza and say illicit things in his english, take a look at your own; and that too when its not someone's native language and it is a main language that is studied in all parts of australia

No wonder someone said "practise before you preach" .



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 06:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stealth Spy
chinawhite no IAF source has ever said that they will not buy the IAF. That is only media speculation to sell more of their copies.



its you who interperates the article differently


i posted it because it relates to the LCA



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 06:21 AM
link   
can you post an article that quotes the IAF saying that they wont buy the LCA instead of posting some reporter's speculation ???



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 06:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Stealth Spy
can you post an article that quotes the IAF saying that they wont buy the LCA instead of posting some reporter's speculation ???


i never said they wont by it. i posted a article like you do.

isn't internet forums about sharing news?



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 12:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by chinawhite
IAF reluctant to place orders for LCA

BANGALORE: The indigenously developed light combat aircraft (LCA) programme is in danger of being undermined by time overruns. The Indian Air Force is delaying taking to its natural conclusion the announcement made last February by Chief of the Air Staff S.P. Tyagi that orders would be placed "soon" for 40 LCAs.

www.hindu.com...



.. Answer me this chinawhite..

Give me one chinese media source that has the guts to point out flaws in the country's military or industries in the way the article does above..
Don't give me some vague "measured" responses/articles..
I want something in comparision to what you posted above vis-a-vis India..
Is that because the is NO PERCEIVABLE problem with chinese equipment??!!
I think not!!


The link you gave.. THATS called freedom of speech and press!!
China is v far from achieving that..



posted on Jul, 11 2005 @ 11:22 PM
link   
You are succesful in closing my thread you really dirty man.



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 01:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Daedalus3


Give me one chinese media source that has the guts to point out flaws in the country's military or industries in the way the article does above..


how do you expect me to post articles about that when all/nearly everything is written in chinese.?
or you you forgot use chinese write chinese

[edit on 12-7-2005 by chinawhite]



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 03:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by mirza2003
You are succesful in closing my thread you really dirty man.


no personal attacks. you think i cant make personal attacks. during the whole time i have restrained myself from making any personal attacks. if you think i dont/cant make any jokes personal attacks rudes remarks your wrong



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 05:24 AM
link   
Get over yourselves, people.
The topic of this thread is:
HAL finds no takers for LCA, not each other.

Any further disruptions or deviations from the topic will result in the topic being closed and other applicable member actions being taken.





seekerof



posted on Jul, 12 2005 @ 05:57 AM
link   
EDIT: next post plz

[edit on 12-7-2005 by Daedalus3]




top topics



 
0
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join