You know that thing that progressives say never happens?

a reply to: quintessentone

Off topic and irrelevant.

I also wish to point out that any one of those so called CISGENDER men can put on a dress, and declare themselves women, and viola, they are. So we really don't know the difference anymore, now, do we? Its about safety and opportunity for WOMEN being taken away by MEN.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
Well it's happened again in Scotland. What's in the water up there?
We had all the hoo ha about that trans rapist wanting to go to a woman's prison, and now another trans abducted a primary school girl off the street and assaulted her.

The link

Least they sent him down for 20 years, usually judges seem to let these sort off rather lightly.

Did you read the link? It was not a transwoman but a pedophile dressed as a woman. Big difference.

Damn dude stop lying!

The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning.

That was from the same link you claim to have read

In the process of.

That's literally what the word transitioning means..........

Nope, the beginning process is all psychological assessments which can take up to two maybe more years. If he can get erections, he's not on the transitioning hormones.

And in Scotland the SNP decreed that people can self declare without any medical inrtervention
Plus it nnever said anywhere he put his knob in her just sexuallty abused her so maybe he couldnt get an erection, unless you know the guy and can confirm he gets hard which perhaps explains some of why you are dissembling so hard to excuse thsi awful abuse

From your link:

In what a judge described as “every parent’s worst nightmare”, Miller took the girl back to his home in the Scottish Borders and subjected her to repeated sexual assaults.

I think we all can figure out what type of sexual assault took place. It's doubtful this pedophile was on gender affirming hormones.

He wore a dress to fool the girl to get into his car because girls tend to trust women more.

The judge said Miller dressing as a woman was an aggravating factor because it was unlikely that the girl would have got into his car if Miller had presented as a man.

This pedophile probably won't get past the psychological assessments regarding any real transitioning as a woman. He seems to have other serious psychological issues.

and if he had stuck his knob in her it would have been called rape. The fact they never used that word tells its own story

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Where does it say he is on hormones?

What are you talking about?

From the link - "The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning." Also he goes by the name "Amy George".

Maybe he gets off without getting an erection? I suppose that's possible.
Unlikely but possible. But he IS transitioning and the new name is Amy George.

Where does it state he is on hormones? I doubt with his psychological problems he would be able to get past the first psychiatric assessment.

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
Well it's happened again in Scotland. What's in the water up there?
We had all the hoo ha about that trans rapist wanting to go to a woman's prison, and now another trans abducted a primary school girl off the street and assaulted her.

The link

Least they sent him down for 20 years, usually judges seem to let these sort off rather lightly.

Did you read the link? It was not a transwoman but a pedophile dressed as a woman. Big difference.

Damn dude stop lying!

The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning.

That was from the same link you claim to have read

In the process of.

That's literally what the word transitioning means..........

Nope, the beginning process is all psychological assessments which can take up to two maybe more years. If he can get erections, he's not on the transitioning hormones.

And in Scotland the SNP decreed that people can self declare without any medical inrtervention
Plus it nnever said anywhere he put his knob in her just sexuallty abused her so maybe he couldnt get an erection, unless you know the guy and can confirm he gets hard which perhaps explains some of why you are dissembling so hard to excuse thsi awful abuse

From your link:

In what a judge described as “every parent’s worst nightmare”, Miller took the girl back to his home in the Scottish Borders and subjected her to repeated sexual assaults.

I think we all can figure out what type of sexual assault took place. It's doubtful this pedophile was on gender affirming hormones.

He wore a dress to fool the girl to get into his car because girls tend to trust women more.

The judge said Miller dressing as a woman was an aggravating factor because it was unlikely that the girl would have got into his car if Miller had presented as a man.

This pedophile probably won't get past the psychological assessments regarding any real transitioning as a woman. He seems to have other serious psychological issues.

and if he had stuck his knob in her it would have been called rape. The fact they never used that word tells its own story

They don't provide specifics so nobody knows what he did to the girl. So we are all speculating.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
Where does it say he is on hormones?

What are you talking about?

From the link - "The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning." Also he goes by the name "Amy George".

Maybe he gets off without getting an erection? I suppose that's possible.
Unlikely but possible. But he IS transitioning and the new name is Amy George.

Where does it state he is on hormones? I doubt with his psychological problems he would be able to get past the first psychiatric assessment.

there are no psych assesments in Scotland, you say you are a woman, according to the law up there you are, even if you still ghave your man bits

a reply to: quintessentone

You will make any excuse to make things line up with what you are saying won't you?

You really do crack me up.

He could have made the comment to his doctor he wanted to start the "transition" nd it still counts as being in the process. Just as if you are wanting to move, if you tell your realtor you want to sell your house that is the start of the process and you are now in the process of selling your house and moving.

originally posted by: AdultMaleHuman73
. . disguise . . tricking

Isn't that what trans do,
disguise to trick and groom ?
They need to leave the children alone.
twenty years is too short !

__________

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: quintessentone

So he's a transexual who's hoping to transition to transgender who abducted and sexually assaulted a primary school child over a period of 27 hours and you're splitting fanny hairs over terminology rather than expressing disgust and outrage?

Personally I'd life the # off, 6x6 cell, straw mattress and a diet of bread and water with solitary confinement....all after neutering the piece of #.

But I guess that would outrage some people who would kick up a stink about his loss of civil liberties etc.

All nonces and people guilty of sex crimes give up their rights the moment they act upon their base instincts....and no rehabilitation and second chances.

Fact is nobody knows what he is so it's all speculation. My problem here is members here jump to trans bashing as a go to and not look at the facts of this case. Not that any of us can figure out what the facts are because there are no specific details by which to make conclusions. Just stop bashing trans and start looking at the facts.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
Well it's happened again in Scotland. What's in the water up there?
We had all the hoo ha about that trans rapist wanting to go to a woman's prison, and now another trans abducted a primary school girl off the street and assaulted her.

The link

Least they sent him down for 20 years, usually judges seem to let these sort off rather lightly.

Did you read the link? It was not a transwoman but a pedophile dressed as a woman. Big difference.

Damn dude stop lying!

The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning.

That was from the same link you claim to have read

In the process of.

That's literally what the word transitioning means..........

Nope, the beginning process is all psychological assessments which can take up to two maybe more years. If he can get erections, he's not on the transitioning hormones.

And in Scotland the SNP decreed that people can self declare without any medical inrtervention
Plus it nnever said anywhere he put his knob in her just sexuallty abused her so maybe he couldnt get an erection, unless you know the guy and can confirm he gets hard which perhaps explains some of why you are dissembling so hard to excuse thsi awful abuse

From your link:

In what a judge described as “every parent’s worst nightmare”, Miller took the girl back to his home in the Scottish Borders and subjected her to repeated sexual assaults.

I think we all can figure out what type of sexual assault took place. It's doubtful this pedophile was on gender affirming hormones.

He wore a dress to fool the girl to get into his car because girls tend to trust women more.

The judge said Miller dressing as a woman was an aggravating factor because it was unlikely that the girl would have got into his car if Miller had presented as a man.

This pedophile probably won't get past the psychological assessments regarding any real transitioning as a woman. He seems to have other serious psychological issues.

and if he had stuck his knob in her it would have been called rape. The fact they never used that word tells its own story

They don't provide specifics so nobody knows what he did to the girl. So we are all speculating.

No you are absolutely wriong here in your attempt to excuse the inexcusable.
If he raped her thats what he would have been charged with, because he didnt they have charged him with sexual assault. Its there in black and white in the LAW no need for feels and stuff

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

You will make any excuse to make things line up with what you are saying won't you?

You really do crack me up.

He could have made the comment to his doctor he wanted to start the "transition" nd it still counts as being in the process. Just as if you are wanting to move, if you tell your realtor you want to sell your house that is the start of the process and you are now in the process of selling your house and moving.

But are you still moving if your house hasnt had hormones?

a reply to: SprocketUK

Dang, I never thought about that.

Guess we should wait for the expert(s) to chime in

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
Well it's happened again in Scotland. What's in the water up there?
We had all the hoo ha about that trans rapist wanting to go to a woman's prison, and now another trans abducted a primary school girl off the street and assaulted her.

The link

Least they sent him down for 20 years, usually judges seem to let these sort off rather lightly.

Did you read the link? It was not a transwoman but a pedophile dressed as a woman. Big difference.

Damn dude stop lying!

The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning.

That was from the same link you claim to have read

In the process of.

That's literally what the word transitioning means..........

Nope, the beginning process is all psychological assessments which can take up to two maybe more years. If he can get erections, he's not on the transitioning hormones.

And in Scotland the SNP decreed that people can self declare without any medical inrtervention
Plus it nnever said anywhere he put his knob in her just sexuallty abused her so maybe he couldnt get an erection, unless you know the guy and can confirm he gets hard which perhaps explains some of why you are dissembling so hard to excuse thsi awful abuse

From your link:

In what a judge described as “every parent’s worst nightmare”, Miller took the girl back to his home in the Scottish Borders and subjected her to repeated sexual assaults.

I think we all can figure out what type of sexual assault took place. It's doubtful this pedophile was on gender affirming hormones.

He wore a dress to fool the girl to get into his car because girls tend to trust women more.

The judge said Miller dressing as a woman was an aggravating factor because it was unlikely that the girl would have got into his car if Miller had presented as a man.

This pedophile probably won't get past the psychological assessments regarding any real transitioning as a woman. He seems to have other serious psychological issues.

and if he had stuck his knob in her it would have been called rape. The fact they never used that word tells its own story

They don't provide specifics so nobody knows what he did to the girl. So we are all speculating.

No you are absolutely wriong here in your attempt to excuse the inexcusable.
If he raped her thats what he would have been charged with, because he didnt they have sharged him with sexual assault. Its there in black and white in the LAW no need for feels and stuff

Nowhere do I excuse the inexcusable.

What is inexcusable is trans bashing as a tool for connecting socially on this forum.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
Well it's happened again in Scotland. What's in the water up there?
We had all the hoo ha about that trans rapist wanting to go to a woman's prison, and now another trans abducted a primary school girl off the street and assaulted her.

The link

Least they sent him down for 20 years, usually judges seem to let these sort off rather lightly.

Did you read the link? It was not a transwoman but a pedophile dressed as a woman. Big difference.

Damn dude stop lying!

The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning.

That was from the same link you claim to have read

In the process of.

That's literally what the word transitioning means..........

Nope, the beginning process is all psychological assessments which can take up to two maybe more years. If he can get erections, he's not on the transitioning hormones.

And in Scotland the SNP decreed that people can self declare without any medical inrtervention
Plus it nnever said anywhere he put his knob in her just sexuallty abused her so maybe he couldnt get an erection, unless you know the guy and can confirm he gets hard which perhaps explains some of why you are dissembling so hard to excuse thsi awful abuse

From your link:

In what a judge described as “every parent’s worst nightmare”, Miller took the girl back to his home in the Scottish Borders and subjected her to repeated sexual assaults.

I think we all can figure out what type of sexual assault took place. It's doubtful this pedophile was on gender affirming hormones.

He wore a dress to fool the girl to get into his car because girls tend to trust women more.

The judge said Miller dressing as a woman was an aggravating factor because it was unlikely that the girl would have got into his car if Miller had presented as a man.

This pedophile probably won't get past the psychological assessments regarding any real transitioning as a woman. He seems to have other serious psychological issues.

and if he had stuck his knob in her it would have been called rape. The fact they never used that word tells its own story

They don't provide specifics so nobody knows what he did to the girl. So we are all speculating.

No you are absolutely wriong here in your attempt to excuse the inexcusable.
If he raped her thats what he would have been charged with, because he didnt they have sharged him with sexual assault. Its there in black and white in the LAW no need for feels and stuff

Nowhere do I excuse the inexcusable.

What is inexcusable is trans bashing as a tool for connecting socially on this forum.

And I am not trans bashing, if anything, I am progresive bashing because they, like you live in some sort of Orwellian Twilight where the truth is banished because it doesn't fit with their wishes,

originally posted by: quintessentone
Where does it state he is on hormones?.

I never said he was or that he wasn't. What are you talking about?

a reply to: quintessentone

The point is you just seem to want to be argumentative and provocative for the sake of it.

I think its been established that he is transexual and wants to transition to transgender.
He used that to his advantage to sexually assault a young girl.

Now instead of trying to obfuscate and deflect can't you for once just condemn the act and the person outright with no if's or but's?

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
Well it's happened again in Scotland. What's in the water up there?
We had all the hoo ha about that trans rapist wanting to go to a woman's prison, and now another trans abducted a primary school girl off the street and assaulted her.

The link

Least they sent him down for 20 years, usually judges seem to let these sort off rather lightly.

Did you read the link? It was not a transwoman but a pedophile dressed as a woman. Big difference.

Damn dude stop lying!

The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning.

That was from the same link you claim to have read

In the process of.

That's literally what the word transitioning means..........

Nope, the beginning process is all psychological assessments which can take up to two maybe more years. If he can get erections, he's not on the transitioning hormones.

And in Scotland the SNP decreed that people can self declare without any medical inrtervention
Plus it nnever said anywhere he put his knob in her just sexuallty abused her so maybe he couldnt get an erection, unless you know the guy and can confirm he gets hard which perhaps explains some of why you are dissembling so hard to excuse thsi awful abuse

From your link:

In what a judge described as “every parent’s worst nightmare”, Miller took the girl back to his home in the Scottish Borders and subjected her to repeated sexual assaults.

I think we all can figure out what type of sexual assault took place. It's doubtful this pedophile was on gender affirming hormones.

He wore a dress to fool the girl to get into his car because girls tend to trust women more.

The judge said Miller dressing as a woman was an aggravating factor because it was unlikely that the girl would have got into his car if Miller had presented as a man.

This pedophile probably won't get past the psychological assessments regarding any real transitioning as a woman. He seems to have other serious psychological issues.

and if he had stuck his knob in her it would have been called rape. The fact they never used that word tells its own story

They don't provide specifics so nobody knows what he did to the girl. So we are all speculating.

No you are absolutely wriong here in your attempt to excuse the inexcusable.
If he raped her thats what he would have been charged with, because he didnt they have sharged him with sexual assault. Its there in black and white in the LAW no need for feels and stuff

Nowhere do I excuse the inexcusable.

What is inexcusable is trans bashing as a tool for connecting socially on this forum.

And I am not trans bashing, if anything, I am progresive bashing because they, like you live in some sort of Orwellian Twilight where the truth is banished because it doesn't fit with their wishes,

Fact: This pedophile male who dons dresses to lure little girls into his car, who says he's transitioning with no proof, is not a transwoman by all definitions of the word.

originally posted by: quintessentone
This pedophile male who dons dresses to lure little girls into his car, who says he's transitioning with no proof, is not a transwoman by all definitions of the word.

He's self identifying as a woman. The court says he's transitioning. He's trans.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: SprocketUK
Well it's happened again in Scotland. What's in the water up there?
We had all the hoo ha about that trans rapist wanting to go to a woman's prison, and now another trans abducted a primary school girl off the street and assaulted her.

The link

Least they sent him down for 20 years, usually judges seem to let these sort off rather lightly.

Did you read the link? It was not a transwoman but a pedophile dressed as a woman. Big difference.

Damn dude stop lying!

The court was told that Miller, who is being held in a men’s prison, is in the process of gender transitioning.

That was from the same link you claim to have read

In the process of.

That's literally what the word transitioning means..........

Nope, the beginning process is all psychological assessments which can take up to two maybe more years. If he can get erections, he's not on the transitioning hormones.

And in Scotland the SNP decreed that people can self declare without any medical inrtervention
Plus it nnever said anywhere he put his knob in her just sexuallty abused her so maybe he couldnt get an erection, unless you know the guy and can confirm he gets hard which perhaps explains some of why you are dissembling so hard to excuse thsi awful abuse

From your link:

In what a judge described as “every parent’s worst nightmare”, Miller took the girl back to his home in the Scottish Borders and subjected her to repeated sexual assaults.

I think we all can figure out what type of sexual assault took place. It's doubtful this pedophile was on gender affirming hormones.

He wore a dress to fool the girl to get into his car because girls tend to trust women more.

The judge said Miller dressing as a woman was an aggravating factor because it was unlikely that the girl would have got into his car if Miller had presented as a man.

This pedophile probably won't get past the psychological assessments regarding any real transitioning as a woman. He seems to have other serious psychological issues.

and if he had stuck his knob in her it would have been called rape. The fact they never used that word tells its own story

They don't provide specifics so nobody knows what he did to the girl. So we are all speculating.

No you are absolutely wriong here in your attempt to excuse the inexcusable.
If he raped her thats what he would have been charged with, because he didnt they have sharged him with sexual assault. Its there in black and white in the LAW no need for feels and stuff

Nowhere do I excuse the inexcusable.

What is inexcusable is trans bashing as a tool for connecting socially on this forum.

And I am not trans bashing, if anything, I am progresive bashing because they, like you live in some sort of Orwellian Twilight where the truth is banished because it doesn't fit with their wishes,

Fact: This pedophile male who dons dresses to lure little girls into his car, who says he's transitioning with no proof, is not a transwoman by all definitions of the word.

Yeah I see you still can't bring yourself to condemn this person like Freeborn said.
I will feel free to draw my own conclusions about you because of that.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
This pedophile male who dons dresses to lure little girls into his car, who says he's transitioning with no proof, is not a transwoman by all definitions of the word.

He's self identifying as a woman. The court says he's transitioning. He's trans.

He is a pedophile and has psychological issues way beyond anything we can figure out. He won't get past the first psychological assessment for transitioning to a transwoman because they will weed out what is exactly the problem and him wanting to be a woman is not it. It's unreasonable for a man who thinks he is a woman to want to sexually assault young girls.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
This pedophile male who dons dresses to lure little girls into his car, who says he's transitioning with no proof, is not a transwoman by all definitions of the word.

He's self identifying as a woman. The court says he's transitioning. He's trans.

He is a pedophile and has psychological issues way beyond anything we can figure out. He won't get past the first psychological assessment for transitioning to a transwoman because they will weed out what is exactly the problem and him wanting to be a woman is not it. It's unreasonable for a man who thinks he is a woman to want to sexually assault young girls.

What rot. Explain Myra Hindley and Rose West then? both born female, horrible rapists and killers both